Final (79/1/0) ended 01:07, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
GraemeL (
talk·contribs) – Fellow Wikipedians! Now that
User:JoanneB has, how shall we say, been nominated for adminship, I nominate GraemeL as a new admin! He has been around for almost three months now, and in that time, he has been a really good and experienced Wikipedian, fighting vandalism and somewhat active on
WP:AFD. I wish he should be made an admin.
— JIP |
Talk09:41, 13 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Support, I have seen enough of this user to be absolutely sure that he'll be a capable, courteous admin. Oh, and all of the above, too :-)
JoanneB19:16, 13 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Support - great vandal fighter, and has helped me out with reverting multiple occurrences of vandalism on a page. As he said in his answers to the questions, he's already doing admin tasks, so it makes sense to make him an admin. --
Idont Havaname04:05, 14 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Support A user who drives me nuts because he is forever reverting vandalism seconds before me. I assumed he had the rollback all this time. (I'm sure I'm not alone there.) Banes15:41, 14 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Support. Lots of vandal whacking, almost always uses edit summary. Adminship would be really useful for this person because fighting vandalism is a big part of their job.
delldot |
talk15:40, 16 November 2005 (UTC)reply
A. I do a significant amount of RC patrol and admin functions would help me do this more effectively; The ability to speedy delete articles that I have to flag at the moment. The ability to fix copy and paste moves. The ability to block problem users and unblock where appropriate, or where collateral damage is unacceptable. I already close speedy deletes at AfD, where an admin has deleted the article, but forgotten to close the related AfD entry. I would extend this to more general closing of AfD discussions. I would also help to monitor
WP:AIV.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. My prose is not particularly riveting. I tend to either be too terse, or waffle on, and so I do not do much article writing. However, I do work to clean up (wikify and format) articles that I get involved with through AfD or copyvio flagging. The best of these is probably
2nd Canadian Infantry Division. I picked it up as a copy and paste copyvio at
Second Canadian Division and was contacted by the author on my talk page. I processed it through the confirmation of permission process, then worked on the article. I finally merged it to its current location, where there was a much shorter existing article on the same subject.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. I've been involved in a few minor conflicts, generally over link spamming and one over the merging of
Ned (Scottish) with
Chav. I feel that all of these were dealt with in a courteous manner. I sometimes get stressed on RC patrol, but I recognise when this is happening, and a half hour break has always been enough to reduce my stress levels.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Final (79/1/0) ended 01:07, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
GraemeL (
talk·contribs) – Fellow Wikipedians! Now that
User:JoanneB has, how shall we say, been nominated for adminship, I nominate GraemeL as a new admin! He has been around for almost three months now, and in that time, he has been a really good and experienced Wikipedian, fighting vandalism and somewhat active on
WP:AFD. I wish he should be made an admin.
— JIP |
Talk09:41, 13 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Support, I have seen enough of this user to be absolutely sure that he'll be a capable, courteous admin. Oh, and all of the above, too :-)
JoanneB19:16, 13 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Support - great vandal fighter, and has helped me out with reverting multiple occurrences of vandalism on a page. As he said in his answers to the questions, he's already doing admin tasks, so it makes sense to make him an admin. --
Idont Havaname04:05, 14 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Support A user who drives me nuts because he is forever reverting vandalism seconds before me. I assumed he had the rollback all this time. (I'm sure I'm not alone there.) Banes15:41, 14 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Support. Lots of vandal whacking, almost always uses edit summary. Adminship would be really useful for this person because fighting vandalism is a big part of their job.
delldot |
talk15:40, 16 November 2005 (UTC)reply
A. I do a significant amount of RC patrol and admin functions would help me do this more effectively; The ability to speedy delete articles that I have to flag at the moment. The ability to fix copy and paste moves. The ability to block problem users and unblock where appropriate, or where collateral damage is unacceptable. I already close speedy deletes at AfD, where an admin has deleted the article, but forgotten to close the related AfD entry. I would extend this to more general closing of AfD discussions. I would also help to monitor
WP:AIV.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. My prose is not particularly riveting. I tend to either be too terse, or waffle on, and so I do not do much article writing. However, I do work to clean up (wikify and format) articles that I get involved with through AfD or copyvio flagging. The best of these is probably
2nd Canadian Infantry Division. I picked it up as a copy and paste copyvio at
Second Canadian Division and was contacted by the author on my talk page. I processed it through the confirmation of permission process, then worked on the article. I finally merged it to its current location, where there was a much shorter existing article on the same subject.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. I've been involved in a few minor conflicts, generally over link spamming and one over the merging of
Ned (Scottish) with
Chav. I feel that all of these were dealt with in a courteous manner. I sometimes get stressed on RC patrol, but I recognise when this is happening, and a half hour break has always been enough to reduce my stress levels.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.