(0/15/1); Ended 17:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
-- Foundby 15:58, 10 January 2007 (UTC) reply
I am pleased with everything because I am a Wikiholic.-- Foundby 15:58, 10 January 2007 (UTC) reply
I never brought this up. Forget about the past, you can't change it. But since it has been brought up here goes: -- Foundby 16:26, 10 January 2007 (UTC) reply
6. Oppose per this and the surrounding conflict. Agathoclea 09:19, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Well for starters I gave User:Pethr this:
The Barnstar of Good Humor | ||
Apparantly you have none Foundby 01:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC) reply |
-- Foundby 16:20, 10 January 2007 (UTC) reply
After that the conflict escalated. -- Foundby 16:20, 10 January 2007 (UTC) reply
Possible misunderstanding with Adolf Hitler
- Look, I really didn't want to discourage you from editing, even less so offend you in any way. You are of course welcomed to edit whatever you want but especialy on established articles it's better to discuss radical changes on talk page or improving upon work that has been already done. It is also necessary to follow certain rules included in WP:Manual of style and other guidelines (you'll find many more links on MoS page). I hope you understand and wish you luck.-- Pethr 01:40, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- You might want to see comments on Talk:Adolf Hitler. Please take the criticism mildly and consider it an advice on what things you are not supposed to do here. Thank you.-- Pethr 02:18, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Heh, Thank you very much!:) Really unexpected. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pethr ( talk • contribs) 01:42, 8 January 2007 (UTC).
- Yes, I was so excited about the barnstar that I forgot to sign.:-D Thank you once more.-- Pethr 01:44, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Well, sorry for another message, but friend asked me whether your barnstar comment means [Apparantly you have none...] "barnstar" or "humor". So how did you mean that?:)-- Pethr 05:15, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, but you're going to have to fix up the grammar and sentence structure of your text before adding it to Adolf Hitler. Nobody can have "the whole article to work on" for 24 hours when it's such a high-traffic page. I suggest you work on your text in a text editor on your own computer, and only add it when you've got it grammatical (and after checking carefully that you don't revert any improvements to it that may have happened in the meantime). At any rate, don't revert me again or I'm afraid I'll have to block you from editing for violating the WP:3RR rule. Thank you. Bishonen | talk 08:20, 8 January 2007 (UTC).
- Could you explain on the talk page why you keep changing the text to bullet-point form. This is contrary to established style. Paul B 11:34, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's comments repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.-- Pethr 16:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- It was my last edit. read the edit history of talk page. sigh! -- Foundby 16:32, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- I've read your edit summary. However, it doesn't justify that you repeatedly removed other user' comments despite beeing politely said not to do so at least two times. Please try to understand this. I really thought we had resolved this yesterday. Thank you.-- Pethr 16:38, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Well since I couldnt edit the main page cuase you reverted it, it is my right to remove inflamatory comments regarding me on the talk page. -- Foundby 16:41, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- There were no "inflamatory comments", other users have said you so already too.
- And no, I'm not "purposely trying to start a scuffle, so it will look good when [I] apply for adminship." You really don't realize that you did something you were not supposed to do and repeated it many times on article and its talk page as well? If other users really wanted to pursue you and didn't look at your contributions, you'd be banned from editing by now. I think that we are all trying to resolve this dispute as peacefully as possible. Please try to understand. Thank you.-- Pethr 16:46, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- And then you can say I resolved it peacfully in the request of adminship, so I must become Admin? -- Foundby 16:47, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- I thing we better end this conversation now. I strongly recommend you read and reread No personal attacks, Civility and Etiquette. Thank you.-- Pethr 16:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Total Edit Count 652. -- Foundby 16:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC) reply
Discussion
Support
Oppose
Neutral
(0/15/1); Ended 17:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
-- Foundby 15:58, 10 January 2007 (UTC) reply
I am pleased with everything because I am a Wikiholic.-- Foundby 15:58, 10 January 2007 (UTC) reply
I never brought this up. Forget about the past, you can't change it. But since it has been brought up here goes: -- Foundby 16:26, 10 January 2007 (UTC) reply
6. Oppose per this and the surrounding conflict. Agathoclea 09:19, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Well for starters I gave User:Pethr this:
The Barnstar of Good Humor | ||
Apparantly you have none Foundby 01:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC) reply |
-- Foundby 16:20, 10 January 2007 (UTC) reply
After that the conflict escalated. -- Foundby 16:20, 10 January 2007 (UTC) reply
Possible misunderstanding with Adolf Hitler
- Look, I really didn't want to discourage you from editing, even less so offend you in any way. You are of course welcomed to edit whatever you want but especialy on established articles it's better to discuss radical changes on talk page or improving upon work that has been already done. It is also necessary to follow certain rules included in WP:Manual of style and other guidelines (you'll find many more links on MoS page). I hope you understand and wish you luck.-- Pethr 01:40, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- You might want to see comments on Talk:Adolf Hitler. Please take the criticism mildly and consider it an advice on what things you are not supposed to do here. Thank you.-- Pethr 02:18, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Heh, Thank you very much!:) Really unexpected. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pethr ( talk • contribs) 01:42, 8 January 2007 (UTC).
- Yes, I was so excited about the barnstar that I forgot to sign.:-D Thank you once more.-- Pethr 01:44, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Well, sorry for another message, but friend asked me whether your barnstar comment means [Apparantly you have none...] "barnstar" or "humor". So how did you mean that?:)-- Pethr 05:15, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, but you're going to have to fix up the grammar and sentence structure of your text before adding it to Adolf Hitler. Nobody can have "the whole article to work on" for 24 hours when it's such a high-traffic page. I suggest you work on your text in a text editor on your own computer, and only add it when you've got it grammatical (and after checking carefully that you don't revert any improvements to it that may have happened in the meantime). At any rate, don't revert me again or I'm afraid I'll have to block you from editing for violating the WP:3RR rule. Thank you. Bishonen | talk 08:20, 8 January 2007 (UTC).
- Could you explain on the talk page why you keep changing the text to bullet-point form. This is contrary to established style. Paul B 11:34, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's comments repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.-- Pethr 16:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- It was my last edit. read the edit history of talk page. sigh! -- Foundby 16:32, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- I've read your edit summary. However, it doesn't justify that you repeatedly removed other user' comments despite beeing politely said not to do so at least two times. Please try to understand this. I really thought we had resolved this yesterday. Thank you.-- Pethr 16:38, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Well since I couldnt edit the main page cuase you reverted it, it is my right to remove inflamatory comments regarding me on the talk page. -- Foundby 16:41, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- There were no "inflamatory comments", other users have said you so already too.
- And no, I'm not "purposely trying to start a scuffle, so it will look good when [I] apply for adminship." You really don't realize that you did something you were not supposed to do and repeated it many times on article and its talk page as well? If other users really wanted to pursue you and didn't look at your contributions, you'd be banned from editing by now. I think that we are all trying to resolve this dispute as peacefully as possible. Please try to understand. Thank you.-- Pethr 16:46, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- And then you can say I resolved it peacfully in the request of adminship, so I must become Admin? -- Foundby 16:47, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- I thing we better end this conversation now. I strongly recommend you read and reread No personal attacks, Civility and Etiquette. Thank you.-- Pethr 16:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Total Edit Count 652. -- Foundby 16:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC) reply
Discussion
Support
Oppose
Neutral