Because there is reason to be panicked over here. Wikipedia is dealing with a SERIOUS
systemic bias against foxes and they don't appear on the main page much. Foxes are a very historically, scientifically and culturally significant subject and we desperately need more coverage of them. Making a fox into an admin will resolve all of this, after all!
~Δ(delta •
t •
c)16:15, 1 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Honestly, my opinion on all of these issues is just simply whatever benefits the Glorious Cabal of the Fopkses at the moment.
Fopks (
talk)
16:18, 1 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
Because there is reason to be panicked over here. Wikipedia is dealing with a SERIOUS
systemic bias against foxes and they don't appear on the main page much. Foxes are a very historically, scientifically and culturally significant subject and we desperately need more coverage of them. Making a fox into an admin will resolve all of this, after all!
~Δ(delta •
t •
c)16:15, 1 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Honestly, my opinion on all of these issues is just simply whatever benefits the Glorious Cabal of the Fopkses at the moment.
Fopks (
talk)
16:18, 1 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.