The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.

Final (26/0/0) ending 10:15 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Enochlau ( talk · contribs) – I have been a Wikipedia user for nearly 2 years now, and I've made nice contributions, both in terms of content as well as administrative duties. I would hope that others have found me pleasant to work with, and someone they can trust. I hope it's not too much to ask for a mop and a broom :) Enochlau 10:15, 25 November 2005 (UTC) reply

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Self-nomination. Enochlau 10:27, 25 November 2005 (UTC) reply

Support

1. Support entirely. Enochlau has been helpful to the community. -- Ghirlandajo 10:41, 25 November 2005 (UTC) reply
2. Support. This candidate demonstrates a true zeal for this project, along with an uncanny sense of duty and responsibility. I have absolutely no doubt that he will carry out his responsibilities with our community's interests in mind. Jogloran 10:44, 25 November 2005 (UTC) reply
3. Support MONGO 11:01, 25 November 2005 (UTC) reply
4. Support. ナイトスタリオン ✉ 11:08, 25 November 2005 (UTC) reply
5. Support. I have no problems at all with this user. Raven4x4x 11:43, 25 November 2005 (UTC) reply
6. Support because I'm at work and sober. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 12:08, 25 November 2005 (UTC) reply
7. Support good editor -- Rogerd 16:29, 25 November 2005 (UTC) reply
8. Support never encountered this editor, but he's been around for a long time and that's good enough for me.  Grue  17:20, 25 November 2005 (UTC) reply
9. 'OMFG Support. BD2412 T 00:27, 26 November 2005 (UTC) reply
10. Support this excellent candidate. Antandrus (talk) 00:29, 26 November 2005 (UTC) reply
11. Support Quentin Pierc e 03:48, 26 November 2005 (UTC) reply
12. Support Enoch has been a tireless contributor to Wikipedia, and is an excellent candidate for adminship. Kewpid 05:45, 26 November 2005 (UTC) reply
13. Support -- негіднийлють ^{( Reply | Spam Me! * )} 07:43, 26 November 2005 (UTC) reply
14. Support most definately, -- cj | talk 09:52, 26 November 2005 (UTC) reply
15. Merovingian 10:00, 26 November 2005 (UTC) reply
16. Support Izehar 22:57, 26 November 2005 (UTC) reply
17. Support. - Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 03:08, 27 November 2005 (UTC). reply
18. Support. El_C 12:55, 27 November 2005 (UTC) reply
19. Support Э нциклопедия * (talk) 22:58, 27 November 2005 (UTC) reply
20. Support Sarah Ewart 00:19, 28 November 2005 (UTC) reply
21. Several positive experiences with this user. — Cryptic (talk) 17:55, 28 November 2005 (UTC) reply
22. Support, excellent seasoned candidate with plenty of experience. Silensor 22:21, 28 November 2005 (UTC) reply
23. Support- a very nice guy in person; a very good editor on Wikipedia. jnothman ^talk 00:52, 29 November 2005 (UTC) reply
24. Support. Give him the mop and broom ... and a bucket and dustpan to boot!. -- DS1953 04:17, 29 November 2005 (UTC) reply
25. Support. Seen him around before. :) -- Andylkl ^{(talk) (contrib)} 08:15, 29 November 2005 (UTC) reply
26. Support. Very useful contributions re: sydney. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Novacatz ( talk • contribs) 19:54, 30 November 2005
27. Support I think you have been around long enough to deserve this :-) Gryffindor 20:56, 1 December 2005 (UTC) reply
28. Support see him around regularly. Dlyons493 Talk 21:02, 1 December 2005 (UTC) reply

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A. In the past, I have done Special:Newpages patrol, and I anticipate that I will continue to do that. I have also closed the occasional vote at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, where I am a regular contributor. I am also avid at cleaning out vandalism, and wikifying and tagging pages, in particular disambig pages. In particular, what I would like to be able to do is delete obvious rubbish and delete redirects in anticipation of moving a page to a name that currently redirects to it, in addition to other admin requests and duties.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A. Although my photography will never be able to live up to the professionals around here, I love contributing images to Wikipedia; in particular, Image:Sydney harbour bridge nye2004.jpg has made it to the Main Page as part of selected anniversaries. In addition, my edits to photoelectric effect back in January 2004 (which started me on Wikipedia!) would prove to have a lasting effect in the reworking of scientific principles, which were previously horribly incorrect. More recently, I have made extensive contributions to contract and its related articles, which while nowhere near perfect, have seen a vast improvement.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A. I've had my few minor disagreements, but I strenuously avoid edit warring with anyone - it's pointless. I don't recall ever being stressed over any work at Wikipedia however. Where I've had disagreements or in general concerns that what I'm doing isn't quite right, I'll just drop a note on the talk page and gather comments to see what others think. Communication and concensus are the key to success, I believe.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.