The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.

Requests_for_adminship/Egil|action=edit}} Vote here (46/0/0) ending 19:46 November 3, 2005 (UTC)

Egil ( talk · contribs) – Egil Kvaleberg has been an active contributor to Wikipedia since January 2003. During this time he has managed to accumulate over 12-thousand edits, approximately 10% of which are to the project and project talk namespace. [1] Egil has a number of special interests, one of which includes being a key contributor to Wikipedia:WikiProject Norway, where he maintains the Wiki bot User:Nobot for the purposes overseeing pages for Norwegian counties and municipalities. With the exception of his user pages, all of his contributions to Wikipedia are multi-licensed with Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike. In addition to his edits to Norwegian-related subjects and other articles, Egil has logged a significant amount of time reversing vandalism, and he frequently makes good use of edit summaries. He has expressed an interest in becoming an administrator, and I believe now is the time to make it happen. Hall Monitor 19:46, 27 October 2005 (UTC) reply

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept the nomination. -- Egil 08:16, 28 October 2005 (UTC) reply

Support

1. Extreme "Yes! I stole the nominator's place" support. 12000 edits, 2.5 years experience. WHOAA!!--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 ($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 08:29, 28 October 2005 (UTC) reply
2. Support. Very strong candidate with a variety of experience. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:26, 28 October 2005 (UTC) reply
3. Support Hey, I'm not usually this high up. I think I have a nosebleed. Proto  t  c 09:16, 28 October 2005 (UTC) reply
4. Fir e Fo x 10:14, 28 October 2005 (UTC) reply
5. EXTREME SUPPORT TROPPUS EMERTXE long overdue for admin powers.   ALKIVAR ™ 11:11, 28 October 2005 (UTC) reply
6. Merovingian (t) (c) (e) 11:26, 28 October 2005 (UTC) reply
7. Support. It never even occurred to me that Egil is not already an admin. -- Scott Davis ^Talk 11:41, 28 October 2005 (UTC) reply
8. SHAZAAM To quote your user page: "My drop-in-the-sea contribution to Wikipedia..." You should also get an award for modesty! -- Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 12:09, 28 October 2005 (UTC) reply
9. Support Martin 12:47, 28 October 2005 (UTC) reply
10. Support.  Grue  13:03, 28 October 2005 (UTC) reply
11. Support, as per nominator.  ;-) Hall Monitor 15:26, 28 October 2005 (UTC) reply
12. Oran e (t) (c) (@) 15:37, 28 October 2005 (UTC) reply
13. Support because in the answer to question 2 the word geo-ccordinates has two c's in it. CambridgeBayWeather 15:55, 28 October 2005 (UTC) reply
14. Support. Good project work, and I suppose we could use another vandal fighter. BTW, how do people get edit summary percents? Voice of All ^{Talk| @| Esperanza} 17:18, 28 October 2005 (UTC) reply
15. Support. Christopher Parham (talk) 17:43, 28 October 2005 (UTC) reply
16. Support NickBall 18:44, 28 October 2005 (UTC) reply
17. Support Privat e Butcher 18:59, 28 October 2005 (UTC) reply
18. Support. And thanks for your diligence in cleaning up after Rktect. -- Tabor 19:30, 28 October 2005 (UTC) reply
19. Support. Dlyons493 Talk 20:04, 28 October 2005 (UTC) reply
20. Support. El_C 23:24, 28 October 2005 (UTC) reply
21. Support. Kirill Lokshin 00:51, 29 October 2005 (UTC) reply
22. Support we need more admins like him-- Rogerd 02:09, 29 October 2005 (UTC) reply
23. Support per everyone else. — JIP | Talk 09:12, 29 October 2005 (UTC) reply
24. Support seems to make sense like that and no sense otherwise. No negative issues as far as I see. Jellypuzzle 09:16, 29 October 2005 (UTC) reply
25. Support The JPS 12:35, 29 October 2005 (UTC) reply
26. Support, though he hardly needs another vote. -- Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης) 15:37, 29 October 2005 (UTC) reply
27. Support, overdue. -- Sn0wflake 17:03, 29 October 2005 (UTC) reply
28. Extreme-I-Am-Not-Original-In-My-Voting Support. Linuxbeak | Talk 18:38, 29 October 2005 (UTC) reply
29. Support per nom.  BD2412 ^talk 00:58, 30 October 2005 (UTC) reply
30. Support. Voice of All ^{Talk| @| Esperanza} 07:00, 30 October 2005 (UTC) reply
31. Support, yes a sure support. -- Bhadani 08:26, 30 October 2005 (UTC) reply
32. Support - Sango 123 (talk) 18:26, 30 October 2005 (UTC) reply
33. Weak Support, though I still think we need more admins who do things other that reverting watchlist vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kookykman ( talk • contribs) 20:14, 30 October 2005
34. Support sounds good. Gryffindor 20:58, 30 October 2005 (UTC) reply
35. Support, this person obviously does a lot more than just reverting vandalism, so I don't know where Kookykman (unsigned above) is coming from. Silensor 06:24, 31 October 2005 (UTC) reply
36. Support. -- Kefalonia 16:03, 31 October 2005 (UTC) reply
37. Support if the watchlist is 'busy' (has all the heavily hit articles) I have no problem if they did stick to just their watchlist. Alf ^melmac 18:15, 31 October 2005 (UTC) reply
38. Support. Looks like a good contributor, loads of experience, no issues. Jayjg ^(talk) 18:34, 31 October 2005 (UTC) reply
39. Support - of course Brookie: A collector of little round things 19:13, 31 October 2005 (UTC) reply
40. -- JAranda | watz sup 00:12, 1 November 2005 (UTC) reply
41. Support -- tomf688^{{ talk}} 04:01, 1 November 2005 (UTC) reply
42. Oh I was missing this one. Great guy, patient, diligent. I coulnd't not support -- ( drini's _vandalproof page ☎ ) 04:57, 1 November 2005 (UTC) reply
43. Support. An excellent candidate and very well deserved -- Ianblair23 (talk) 05:02, 1 November 2005 (UTC) reply
44. Support. Yamaguchi先生 08:30, 1 November 2005 (UTC) reply
45. Support. Jonathunder 22:38, 1 November 2005 (UTC) reply
46. Support. -- DS1953 ^talk 00:03, 2 November 2005 (UTC) reply
47. Support Johann Wolfgang 18:36, 2 November 2005 (UTC) reply
48. Support - Admirable in dealing with User:Rktect - Hahnchen 20:13, 2 November 2005 (UTC) reply
49. Support. Shanes 08:34, 3 November 2005 (UTC) reply
50. Support ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t • @ 12:11, 3 November 2005 (UTC) reply

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)

A. I would mostly concentrate on vandalism on my watchlist (I believe it is around 5k pages), as I have been. But hopefully I would have time to at least spend some time on other housekeeping chores.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A. Probably the Wikipedia:WikiProject Geographical coordinates, which is a concept for adding geographical coordinates to articles, and link them to various map resources. It is still in a trial phase, linking to an external server that I run, but even the trial version seems to have created a reasonable degree of interest — more than 5000 articles had such coordinates last time I counted. The software I wrote for this is documented on Meta:Gis; perhaps one day it may be considered for inclusion in Wikipedia proper, in which case it would allow further functionality for the geo-ccordinates, such as neighborhood information and eventually, automated maps.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A. I guess, with one exception, issues has always seemed to be solvable in reasonable manner via discussion. People here seems reasonable. The exception is described in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rktect, which now seems to have been solved (I hope).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.