Duk has been here for almost 7 months and has 2290 edits. They run the gamut from
image creation to
creating and bringing an article to featured article status to
fighting vandalism to
participating in VfD to
good old grunt work. He gets involved in talk pages and encourages discussion. When he's wrong, he's not afraid to
admit it. Even though he and I have been on opposing sides of debates before, I can say without reservation that I strongly feel he would benefit from the tools of adminship and use them appropriately.
CryptoDerk 14:52, Dec 17, 2004 (UTC)
Strongly support.Soda can stove is the best article ever (or at least since
exploding whale). [[User:Blankfaze|
VOTE BLANKFAZE]] |
(что??) 16:34, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I hope you're as great an administrator as you have been an editor. --
Ben Brockert 01:07, Dec 19, 2004 (UTC)
Support. I quite liked Soda can stove and it got to the front page. Seems like a good editor, not too controversial. Should be OK (fingers crossed!) -
Ta bu shi da yu 08:51, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Support. I haven't encountered this user before, but his list of contributions shows lots of good edits.
jni 08:53, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Looks good, lots of maintanance work. --
fvw* 17:56, 2004 Dec 20 (UTC)
Support. The quality of this user's work suggests sufficient knowledge to help other users, as well as a commitment to the encyclopedia.
Nathanlarson32767 19:00, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
A. At first, the rollback button for vandalism, assist
IFD (alongside the image tagging project), and avail myself to anyone needing sysop assistance. Later, help deal with vandals.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and will deal with it in the future?
A. Very rarely. I think I've had edit disputes only a couple of times. I have been lucky, because they have been with people who have the best intentions, same as me. When an argument flairs, I find that a step back, a little bit of humility, and a clearly stated argument has always been reciprocated.
As far as others causing me stress, not much. People sometimes do things I don't agree with, I'm sure I do things that other people disagree with. So I try to have patience (and I've sensed other people's patience with me). In the future, I see myself becoming more patient and more engaging in edit discussions.
Duk has been here for almost 7 months and has 2290 edits. They run the gamut from
image creation to
creating and bringing an article to featured article status to
fighting vandalism to
participating in VfD to
good old grunt work. He gets involved in talk pages and encourages discussion. When he's wrong, he's not afraid to
admit it. Even though he and I have been on opposing sides of debates before, I can say without reservation that I strongly feel he would benefit from the tools of adminship and use them appropriately.
CryptoDerk 14:52, Dec 17, 2004 (UTC)
Strongly support.Soda can stove is the best article ever (or at least since
exploding whale). [[User:Blankfaze|
VOTE BLANKFAZE]] |
(что??) 16:34, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I hope you're as great an administrator as you have been an editor. --
Ben Brockert 01:07, Dec 19, 2004 (UTC)
Support. I quite liked Soda can stove and it got to the front page. Seems like a good editor, not too controversial. Should be OK (fingers crossed!) -
Ta bu shi da yu 08:51, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Support. I haven't encountered this user before, but his list of contributions shows lots of good edits.
jni 08:53, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Looks good, lots of maintanance work. --
fvw* 17:56, 2004 Dec 20 (UTC)
Support. The quality of this user's work suggests sufficient knowledge to help other users, as well as a commitment to the encyclopedia.
Nathanlarson32767 19:00, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
A. At first, the rollback button for vandalism, assist
IFD (alongside the image tagging project), and avail myself to anyone needing sysop assistance. Later, help deal with vandals.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and will deal with it in the future?
A. Very rarely. I think I've had edit disputes only a couple of times. I have been lucky, because they have been with people who have the best intentions, same as me. When an argument flairs, I find that a step back, a little bit of humility, and a clearly stated argument has always been reciprocated.
As far as others causing me stress, not much. People sometimes do things I don't agree with, I'm sure I do things that other people disagree with. So I try to have patience (and I've sensed other people's patience with me). In the future, I see myself becoming more patient and more engaging in edit discussions.