Vote here (15/10/11) ending 15:12 October 7 (UTC)
Deryck Chan ( talk · contribs) – Deryck has been with us actively since May of this year, first as Deryckchan, and presently as Deryck Chan. He has over 2600 edits between the two accounts, with edits spread out among the namespace. He is involved in editing and writing Hong Kong related articles and has contributed several FAs already. In addition, he has also helped me maintain WP:MIND. I feel that this is a worthy Wikipedian who deserves a mop and bucket. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W S 15:12, 30 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Support
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate
1.The answer to Q3 indicates you learned something (swell!) about how the project works from an incident. Do you really think it's to the projects advantage to let "the other side keep their edits" if it means possible POV or falsehoods in articles?
2.How would you act, as an admin, to help defuse situations between other editors?
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
Vote here (15/10/11) ending 15:12 October 7 (UTC)
Deryck Chan ( talk · contribs) – Deryck has been with us actively since May of this year, first as Deryckchan, and presently as Deryck Chan. He has over 2600 edits between the two accounts, with edits spread out among the namespace. He is involved in editing and writing Hong Kong related articles and has contributed several FAs already. In addition, he has also helped me maintain WP:MIND. I feel that this is a worthy Wikipedian who deserves a mop and bucket. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W S 15:12, 30 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Support
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate
1.The answer to Q3 indicates you learned something (swell!) about how the project works from an incident. Do you really think it's to the projects advantage to let "the other side keep their edits" if it means possible POV or falsehoods in articles?
2.How would you act, as an admin, to help defuse situations between other editors?
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters: