Final (44/0/0) Ended Mon, 6 Nov 2006 13:07:13 UTC
Daniel Olsen ( talk · contribs) – I would like to nominate myself because I believe in the Wikipedia project, I've contributed for some time, and I want to continue to do as much as I can to help. I believe I have a very good knowledge of Wikipedia policy and process and I'll be able to use that knowledge to make the most out of my adminship (if I get it). If you're getting a bit of deja vu with this nom, it's probably because you saw my previous nom. After my gnome-ish work to Wikipedia, I was a bit perturbed when the first vote was a user judging me solely on statistics without giving me a chance, and I shot myself in the foot by making an uncivil response to that first vote. Rather than start a new username with a blank slate, I decided to continue editing under this username and earn my reputation back. Other concerns of the past nomination include arguments used in AfDs that people see as arguments to avoid. In AfDs since then I've tried to cite specific policies or guidelines while voting. I believe that my responsible use of VP and AWB, while not full admin tools, show some level of responsibility with mop-like tools. If I'm given the mop, I'll wield it just like I’ve wielded the pseudo-mops in the past. Daniel Olsen 03:38, 29 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
Self-posed question from Daniel Olsen ( talk · contribs)
Question from Jeff503 ( talk · contribs)
Optional questions from Malber ( talk · contribs)
Optional question from MJCdetroit ( talk · contribs)
Discussion
Support
Oppose
Neutral
Final (44/0/0) Ended Mon, 6 Nov 2006 13:07:13 UTC
Daniel Olsen ( talk · contribs) – I would like to nominate myself because I believe in the Wikipedia project, I've contributed for some time, and I want to continue to do as much as I can to help. I believe I have a very good knowledge of Wikipedia policy and process and I'll be able to use that knowledge to make the most out of my adminship (if I get it). If you're getting a bit of deja vu with this nom, it's probably because you saw my previous nom. After my gnome-ish work to Wikipedia, I was a bit perturbed when the first vote was a user judging me solely on statistics without giving me a chance, and I shot myself in the foot by making an uncivil response to that first vote. Rather than start a new username with a blank slate, I decided to continue editing under this username and earn my reputation back. Other concerns of the past nomination include arguments used in AfDs that people see as arguments to avoid. In AfDs since then I've tried to cite specific policies or guidelines while voting. I believe that my responsible use of VP and AWB, while not full admin tools, show some level of responsibility with mop-like tools. If I'm given the mop, I'll wield it just like I’ve wielded the pseudo-mops in the past. Daniel Olsen 03:38, 29 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
Self-posed question from Daniel Olsen ( talk · contribs)
Question from Jeff503 ( talk · contribs)
Optional questions from Malber ( talk · contribs)
Optional question from MJCdetroit ( talk · contribs)
Discussion
Support
Oppose
Neutral