Final (88/4/1); Ended 00:29, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Crum375 ( talk · contribs) - Crum375 has been editing since May 2006 and has accumulated 5,000 edits overall, including 2,000 to articles. He seems very mature and level-headed, and has shown himself to be an excellent editor, who understands and respects the content policies. He has a calming effect on talk pages, taking time to explain his position carefully to opponents and seeking consensus for his edits. As well as creating and writing articles on aviation safety, which seems to be his main area of interest, he has been active in helping to maintain and explain WP:VERIFY, WP:NOR, WP:BLP, and WP:VANDALISM, and has in general become a respected member of the community. I'm confident that he'll be an ideal administrator. Musical L inguist 00:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for participants:
There are some works, primarily historically important photographs and significant modern artworks, that we can not realistically expect to be released under a free content license, but that are hard to discuss in an educational context without including the media itself. Because the inability to include these works limits scholarship and criticism, in many jurisdictions people may use such works under limited conditions without having license or permission. Some works that are under licenses we do not accept (such as non-derivative) may meet these conditions. Because of our commitment to free content, this non-free media should not be used when it is reasonably possible to replace with free media that would serve the same educational purpose.
Optional question from llywrch
Please keep criticism constructive and polite.
Discussion
Support
Oppose
Neutral
Final (88/4/1); Ended 00:29, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Crum375 ( talk · contribs) - Crum375 has been editing since May 2006 and has accumulated 5,000 edits overall, including 2,000 to articles. He seems very mature and level-headed, and has shown himself to be an excellent editor, who understands and respects the content policies. He has a calming effect on talk pages, taking time to explain his position carefully to opponents and seeking consensus for his edits. As well as creating and writing articles on aviation safety, which seems to be his main area of interest, he has been active in helping to maintain and explain WP:VERIFY, WP:NOR, WP:BLP, and WP:VANDALISM, and has in general become a respected member of the community. I'm confident that he'll be an ideal administrator. Musical L inguist 00:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for participants:
There are some works, primarily historically important photographs and significant modern artworks, that we can not realistically expect to be released under a free content license, but that are hard to discuss in an educational context without including the media itself. Because the inability to include these works limits scholarship and criticism, in many jurisdictions people may use such works under limited conditions without having license or permission. Some works that are under licenses we do not accept (such as non-derivative) may meet these conditions. Because of our commitment to free content, this non-free media should not be used when it is reasonably possible to replace with free media that would serve the same educational purpose.
Optional question from llywrch
Please keep criticism constructive and polite.
Discussion
Support
Oppose
Neutral