Definitely!... His or her contributions to Australian-related topics are remarkable!... and someone in which I think would be a good sysop
squash 00:02, Sep 23, 2004 (UTC)
Given my boundless respect, admiration and affection for Our Ambivalently Hysterical One, if she says Chuq is admin material, that's good enough for me. Support. -
Lucky 6.9 02:41, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
I trust the judgement of other voters.
{Ανάριον} 07:40, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Exactly, glad it rings a bell for you, but it was not just the vote and I was not the only one who took notice ;-)) --
Pgreenfinch 12:13, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
2. Are you interested in, and do you think you'll have some time to perform, the chores that only sysops have access to do, to help keep Wikipedia up to date?
A. Well I already do similar maintenance-type things now, so I expect I will transfer that to admin tasks in the future (I just won't have to ask an admin to do it for me)!
3. If you become a sysop, which sysop chore or chores (
WP:VFD,
recent changes, watching for vandals and vandalism, responding to editor requests for assistance, any other) do you especially think you would be able to help with.
A. At the moment I do a bit of each of those, watching for vandals and have a go at RC patrol sometimes as well, so I guess these will increase when I can use the admin tools to make it a bit easier!
4. In your opinion, what article have you contributed the most succesfully and helpfully to?
I'm not an admin, but he's done especially good work on Triple J. (sorry for comments from the peanut gallery) -
Ta bu shi da yu 01:01, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)
5. In your opinion, what has your best contribution to the running and maintenance of Wikipedia been? (i.e., have you reverted a bad stretch of vandalism, done extensive work categorizing articles, helped mediate a dispute?)
6. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and will deal with it in the future?
A. I had a disagreement with Adam Carr about some political terminology. After a short (less than a week) WikiVacation, I decided to let him concentrate more on articles about Australian politics, as he clearly has more detailed knowledge about the topic, and I concentrated more on articles that are lacking detail, such as Australian music. From now on I expect the newly created
Wikipedia:Australian wikipedians' notice board will be the focus of my work!
Thanks again to Ambi and others who have offered me their support! --
Chuq 00:01, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Definitely!... His or her contributions to Australian-related topics are remarkable!... and someone in which I think would be a good sysop
squash 00:02, Sep 23, 2004 (UTC)
Given my boundless respect, admiration and affection for Our Ambivalently Hysterical One, if she says Chuq is admin material, that's good enough for me. Support. -
Lucky 6.9 02:41, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
I trust the judgement of other voters.
{Ανάριον} 07:40, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Exactly, glad it rings a bell for you, but it was not just the vote and I was not the only one who took notice ;-)) --
Pgreenfinch 12:13, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
2. Are you interested in, and do you think you'll have some time to perform, the chores that only sysops have access to do, to help keep Wikipedia up to date?
A. Well I already do similar maintenance-type things now, so I expect I will transfer that to admin tasks in the future (I just won't have to ask an admin to do it for me)!
3. If you become a sysop, which sysop chore or chores (
WP:VFD,
recent changes, watching for vandals and vandalism, responding to editor requests for assistance, any other) do you especially think you would be able to help with.
A. At the moment I do a bit of each of those, watching for vandals and have a go at RC patrol sometimes as well, so I guess these will increase when I can use the admin tools to make it a bit easier!
4. In your opinion, what article have you contributed the most succesfully and helpfully to?
I'm not an admin, but he's done especially good work on Triple J. (sorry for comments from the peanut gallery) -
Ta bu shi da yu 01:01, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)
5. In your opinion, what has your best contribution to the running and maintenance of Wikipedia been? (i.e., have you reverted a bad stretch of vandalism, done extensive work categorizing articles, helped mediate a dispute?)
6. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and will deal with it in the future?
A. I had a disagreement with Adam Carr about some political terminology. After a short (less than a week) WikiVacation, I decided to let him concentrate more on articles about Australian politics, as he clearly has more detailed knowledge about the topic, and I concentrated more on articles that are lacking detail, such as Australian music. From now on I expect the newly created
Wikipedia:Australian wikipedians' notice board will be the focus of my work!
Thanks again to Ambi and others who have offered me their support! --
Chuq 00:01, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)