Catbar has been here since December and has made about 800 edits. Solid contributor who deserves admin status.
Meelar 04:48, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC)
I'm pleased to be nominated - thank you, Meelar. I've found it interesting to work on the Wikipedia. I hope I can be a worthy admin.
Brian Rock 05:32, Apr 25, 2004 (UTC)
--
HCHENEY 22:28, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC) Moggy made me vote support.
Oppose:
Not enough experience here yet, IMHO.
Kingturtle 15:12, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Neutral:
Not enough edits, but I suppose a good worker. --
Merovingian ↕
Talk 13:55, Apr 26, 2004 (UTC)
Agree with Merovingian --
Graham :) |
Talk 22:47, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
I don't think that absolute number of edits is good indication of contributor activity in all cases. Some people correct typos and formatting, or don't use the preview button, and rack up a lot of edits while others perform substantial work in only a few edits. A quick look at his user page shows several pages which he has created. Also, although it is easy for experienced users to forget, 800 is still a lot of edits.
Maximus Rex 23:15, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)
That's why my vote is neutral and not oppose. --
Merovingian ↕
Talk 18:24, Apr 28, 2004 (UTC)
Yes, but neutral is just a very polite way of saying "oppose" ;-).
Maximus Rex 18:30, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Well actually a neutral doesn't hurt. An oppose cancels out four supports. Neutrals are ok. :-)
Brian Rock 22:06, Apr 28, 2004 (UTC)
Thanks for your support. I wasn't going to toot my own horn, but I am proud of the fact that several of my new articles have been featured on the Main Page:
Jake and
Hemotoxin are two that I know of. While I've done my share of fixing minor typos, I do prefer more extensive contributions, when I have something to offer.
Brian Rock 23:39, Apr 27, 2004 (UTC)
Catbar has been here since December and has made about 800 edits. Solid contributor who deserves admin status.
Meelar 04:48, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC)
I'm pleased to be nominated - thank you, Meelar. I've found it interesting to work on the Wikipedia. I hope I can be a worthy admin.
Brian Rock 05:32, Apr 25, 2004 (UTC)
--
HCHENEY 22:28, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC) Moggy made me vote support.
Oppose:
Not enough experience here yet, IMHO.
Kingturtle 15:12, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Neutral:
Not enough edits, but I suppose a good worker. --
Merovingian ↕
Talk 13:55, Apr 26, 2004 (UTC)
Agree with Merovingian --
Graham :) |
Talk 22:47, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
I don't think that absolute number of edits is good indication of contributor activity in all cases. Some people correct typos and formatting, or don't use the preview button, and rack up a lot of edits while others perform substantial work in only a few edits. A quick look at his user page shows several pages which he has created. Also, although it is easy for experienced users to forget, 800 is still a lot of edits.
Maximus Rex 23:15, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)
That's why my vote is neutral and not oppose. --
Merovingian ↕
Talk 18:24, Apr 28, 2004 (UTC)
Yes, but neutral is just a very polite way of saying "oppose" ;-).
Maximus Rex 18:30, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Well actually a neutral doesn't hurt. An oppose cancels out four supports. Neutrals are ok. :-)
Brian Rock 22:06, Apr 28, 2004 (UTC)
Thanks for your support. I wasn't going to toot my own horn, but I am proud of the fact that several of my new articles have been featured on the Main Page:
Jake and
Hemotoxin are two that I know of. While I've done my share of fixing minor typos, I do prefer more extensive contributions, when I have something to offer.
Brian Rock 23:39, Apr 27, 2004 (UTC)