Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
I do indeed accept. I've only been around since July of this year, but according to
Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of edits I'd made 8,000 main namespace edits last time the list was updated. (Not, of course, wishing to encourage editcountitis, and please note that many of these are minor edits...) Even if I'm not successful in being nominated for adminship, any feedback received via this process will be valuable.
CLW19:56, 7 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Yes indeed, 'tis the same me. I've been quiet on the Snicket front for a few weeks - I'd been holding off until I'd read
The Penultimate Peril for fear of spoilers, but I finally read it this weekend and will no doubt be appearing at a watchlist near you more frequently once again!
CLW21:44, 7 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Support. Everything looks in place, good edits, good edit summaries, Would like to see a bit more User talk: when working on problems from others, but still Support!
xaosfluxT/C04:14, 8 December 2005 (UTC)reply
A. I've been frustrated by backlogs in the past - If I'm granted adminship, I'll be able to help with backlogs such as deletions. Although it doesn't take adminship to fight vandalism, being able to roll back vandalism will make things faster.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. Please see my
userpage for details of articles I've started - I'm particularly pleased with the articles I've translated from other Wikipediæ, as this helps to address the current English Wikipedia inbalance towards subjects relating to the English-speaking world.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. I've been picked up on decisions I've made in the past (see my
talk page) and have taken onboard the comments left by other users. I've dealt with any such "conflicts" constructively, eliciting replies from other parties such as "Tnx for the constructive response. I know it's hard to get every policy clear, and i guess that means we have to keep listening to each other. In fact, tnx for putting me in a position to put that into words again, by seeing it gracefully done."
I've also averted potential conflict. You'll see from my
talk page that my first contact from
Brookie was his concerns that I might have been stalking him. Our ongoing contact and rapport has led to this nomination!
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
I do indeed accept. I've only been around since July of this year, but according to
Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of edits I'd made 8,000 main namespace edits last time the list was updated. (Not, of course, wishing to encourage editcountitis, and please note that many of these are minor edits...) Even if I'm not successful in being nominated for adminship, any feedback received via this process will be valuable.
CLW19:56, 7 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Yes indeed, 'tis the same me. I've been quiet on the Snicket front for a few weeks - I'd been holding off until I'd read
The Penultimate Peril for fear of spoilers, but I finally read it this weekend and will no doubt be appearing at a watchlist near you more frequently once again!
CLW21:44, 7 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Support. Everything looks in place, good edits, good edit summaries, Would like to see a bit more User talk: when working on problems from others, but still Support!
xaosfluxT/C04:14, 8 December 2005 (UTC)reply
A. I've been frustrated by backlogs in the past - If I'm granted adminship, I'll be able to help with backlogs such as deletions. Although it doesn't take adminship to fight vandalism, being able to roll back vandalism will make things faster.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. Please see my
userpage for details of articles I've started - I'm particularly pleased with the articles I've translated from other Wikipediæ, as this helps to address the current English Wikipedia inbalance towards subjects relating to the English-speaking world.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. I've been picked up on decisions I've made in the past (see my
talk page) and have taken onboard the comments left by other users. I've dealt with any such "conflicts" constructively, eliciting replies from other parties such as "Tnx for the constructive response. I know it's hard to get every policy clear, and i guess that means we have to keep listening to each other. In fact, tnx for putting me in a position to put that into words again, by seeing it gracefully done."
I've also averted potential conflict. You'll see from my
talk page that my first contact from
Brookie was his concerns that I might have been stalking him. Our ongoing contact and rapport has led to this nomination!
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.