Oppose. Sorry, but 627 edits (200-odd in article space) is too few. Stick at it, write more articles, and you'll be alright to reapply.
David |
Talk21:49, 30 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. (edit conflict) Actually, you have more than 520 edits, but sorry, at 620 edits or so, with only around 200 edits to the main space, you still do not meet my
personal standards. Also, please note that articles do not "lose" AfD. I suggest you familiarise yourself a little more with Wikipedia policies and procedures. Keep doing what you're doing, and at 2000 edits or so, I'll probably vote support. --
Deathphoenixʕ21:53, 30 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Low overall activity for time period, low use of edit summaries and answers to questions don't inspire confidence. --
pgk(
talk)22:08, 30 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Edit summary usage: 19% for major edits and 27% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 11 minor edits in the article namespace.
Mathbot21:45, 30 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A:A few times. I will usually try to solve the problem maturly, although If I am in an angry mood, I may type in all CAPS.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
Oppose. Sorry, but 627 edits (200-odd in article space) is too few. Stick at it, write more articles, and you'll be alright to reapply.
David |
Talk21:49, 30 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. (edit conflict) Actually, you have more than 520 edits, but sorry, at 620 edits or so, with only around 200 edits to the main space, you still do not meet my
personal standards. Also, please note that articles do not "lose" AfD. I suggest you familiarise yourself a little more with Wikipedia policies and procedures. Keep doing what you're doing, and at 2000 edits or so, I'll probably vote support. --
Deathphoenixʕ21:53, 30 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Low overall activity for time period, low use of edit summaries and answers to questions don't inspire confidence. --
pgk(
talk)22:08, 30 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Edit summary usage: 19% for major edits and 27% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 11 minor edits in the article namespace.
Mathbot21:45, 30 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A:A few times. I will usually try to solve the problem maturly, although If I am in an angry mood, I may type in all CAPS.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.