From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Final (0/5/0) ended 22:13, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Ac1983fan ( talk · contribs) – Has been a member for 4 to 6 months, contributes repeatedly to articles releated to Video games, will occaisinoly check for vandals on Recent Changes. Has 520 Something edits. acfan- Talk to me 21:28, 30 March 2006 (UTC) reply

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:I accept -- acfan- Talk to me 21:33, 30 March 2006 (UTC) reply

Support

Oppose

  1. Oppose. Sorry, but 627 edits (200-odd in article space) is too few. Stick at it, write more articles, and you'll be alright to reapply. David | Talk 21:49, 30 March 2006 (UTC) reply
  2. Oppose. (edit conflict) Actually, you have more than 520 edits, but sorry, at 620 edits or so, with only around 200 edits to the main space, you still do not meet my personal standards. Also, please note that articles do not "lose" AfD. I suggest you familiarise yourself a little more with Wikipedia policies and procedures. Keep doing what you're doing, and at 2000 edits or so, I'll probably vote support. -- D e athphoenix ʕ 21:53, 30 March 2006 (UTC) reply
  3. Oppose. Low overall activity for time period, low use of edit summaries and answers to questions don't inspire confidence. -- pgk( talk) 22:08, 30 March 2006 (UTC) reply
  4. Oppose, per Deathphoenix. Naconkantari e| t|| c| m 22:55, 30 March 2006 (UTC) reply
  5. Oppose: "Will block bad users?" What exactly is a bad user? As noted above, AfD's are not exactly lost, and for the other reasons above, per pgk, I must oppose. SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! 23:04, 30 March 2006 (UTC) reply

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A: I will block bad users and delete articles that are marked & qualify for speedy deletion, as well as ones that lose in Afd debates.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A: My contributations to the articles Nintendo, Shadow the Hedgehog (game), Sonic X-treme and Sonic Riders, because those are the articles I have worked the hardest on.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A:A few times. I will usually try to solve the problem maturly, although If I am in an angry mood, I may type in all CAPS.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Final (0/5/0) ended 22:13, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Ac1983fan ( talk · contribs) – Has been a member for 4 to 6 months, contributes repeatedly to articles releated to Video games, will occaisinoly check for vandals on Recent Changes. Has 520 Something edits. acfan- Talk to me 21:28, 30 March 2006 (UTC) reply

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:I accept -- acfan- Talk to me 21:33, 30 March 2006 (UTC) reply

Support

Oppose

  1. Oppose. Sorry, but 627 edits (200-odd in article space) is too few. Stick at it, write more articles, and you'll be alright to reapply. David | Talk 21:49, 30 March 2006 (UTC) reply
  2. Oppose. (edit conflict) Actually, you have more than 520 edits, but sorry, at 620 edits or so, with only around 200 edits to the main space, you still do not meet my personal standards. Also, please note that articles do not "lose" AfD. I suggest you familiarise yourself a little more with Wikipedia policies and procedures. Keep doing what you're doing, and at 2000 edits or so, I'll probably vote support. -- D e athphoenix ʕ 21:53, 30 March 2006 (UTC) reply
  3. Oppose. Low overall activity for time period, low use of edit summaries and answers to questions don't inspire confidence. -- pgk( talk) 22:08, 30 March 2006 (UTC) reply
  4. Oppose, per Deathphoenix. Naconkantari e| t|| c| m 22:55, 30 March 2006 (UTC) reply
  5. Oppose: "Will block bad users?" What exactly is a bad user? As noted above, AfD's are not exactly lost, and for the other reasons above, per pgk, I must oppose. SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! 23:04, 30 March 2006 (UTC) reply

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A: I will block bad users and delete articles that are marked & qualify for speedy deletion, as well as ones that lose in Afd debates.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A: My contributations to the articles Nintendo, Shadow the Hedgehog (game), Sonic X-treme and Sonic Riders, because those are the articles I have worked the hardest on.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A:A few times. I will usually try to solve the problem maturly, although If I am in an angry mood, I may type in all CAPS.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook