Science desk | ||
---|---|---|
< November 16 | << Oct | November | Dec >> | November 18 > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Science Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
Please see. Ben-Natan ( talk) 08:17, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
What actually happens to the soapy water that gets on the bathroom floor when people are washing their hands. Does the soap component just evaporate with water? Clover345 ( talk) 20:14, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Since the OP has taken to deleting responses to his/her questions, I am closing this discussion. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 17:24, 18 November 2014 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
If we compare times between altitudes, we see a gap time. (General Relativity) Why don't we see differences in the pictures of the skies ? Thank you for your answers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.194.81.188 ( talk • contribs)
Should there not be an accumulation of time ?
A stone on a mountain where we can find a telescope stays there since long time. We see the same thing as the stone. So there should be an accumulation of something relative to a billion of years. No ?
So your glock don't work as you see, or you don't have any time delay. (Sorry. I am not moving to the mountain. I wait on the mountain and then come back. Be more precise)
I am talking about gravitation not time travel. Or is the question the same ? If yes, please show me.
""If you are on top of a 5 km mountain you will see the light from distant stars slightly sooner than someone at sea level, solely because you are 5 km closer to the stars. The rough amount is 16 microseconds (5 km / speed of light), and that amount does not change or accumulate depending on how long you stay on the mountain. It only depends on the fact that the mountain is slightly closer to the stars."" I don't think it has something to do with the problem Think about a human that could have 1 billion years (stone) speaking to another one who just came at the end for 1 second. If I am not wrong there should be an accumulation BETWEEN two beams of stars. 50 nano between the beam at 0.00 and this at 24.00
person A become at 0.00 the Beam 1 (Altitude between A and B: 5km) B 0.00 Beam 1 A 24.00 Beam 2 B 23.00 (glock A) Beam 2 A see the stars at 24.00 B see the stars at 23.00 Difference between them is not distance but time stayed in gravitation. That is what says general relativity (1.00 = 50 nano). Then repeat it 1 billion years. Gap between stars 5 years.
Once again you speak about the distance between them (special relativity). Try if they see a second shooting star and compare the times (with a difference of gravitation between A and B). Say me if you don't want to answer me anymore.
I don't speak about the gravity of the beams but the gravity area of A and B. A and B are people at different altitudes.
To resume. Someone on a mountain who is 1 billion x 365 days old has 5 x 365 days more than someone (1 billion years old) who is 5km below. The difference of nights should be 5 years. The sky from one should be 5 years later than the other one.
Ok I begin to grasp. If time and day are sychronysed, how can someone become older than the other ? Hey guys, relativity means relativity (it means no time synchronization but referential synchronization). Has anyone read Einstein's work ?
High gravity on A, low gravity on B. :*Synchro0 : 00h00 on the two glocks. :*Synchro1 : 01h00 on glock A 00h59 on B. :*Synchro2 : sunrise, 02h00 on A 01h58 on B. :*Synchro3 : sunset, 06h00 on A 05h54 on B. The referential was A, now lets with B: :*Synchro0 : 00h00 on the two glocks. :*Synchro1 : 01h01 on glock A 01h00 on B. :*Synchro2 : sunrise, 02h02 on A 02h00 on B. :*Synchro3 : sunset, 06h06 on A 06h00 on B. B has to compare data with A at 6h00 for A. It means 5h54 for B Lets do it for a billion of years. |
i have got non polarized polyester capacitior which has "0.022K400V" printed on it. what is the value of cap in uF? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.223.145.15 ( talk • contribs) 21:20, 17 November 2014
I have carrying cases of this material which came with cordless drills. The drills are now obsolete or worn out and the batteries are no longer taking a charge.
But the cases are like new, aside from a bit of dust. It is too bad the tools were not as well-made as the cases.
I would like to reuse the cases to carry other things. Each side of the case has an outer shell and an inner "insert", molded to fit the original contents. Insert and outer shell are strongly joined together.
If it was possible to soften the insert with heat, it could be reshaped to fit other contents.
The question is, can this material be judiciously softened with heat using for example a small propane torch without it catching fire or giving off noxious fumes? Or to put it another way, is the temperature at which it would soften and become malleable far enough below the point at which it would burn, as to make my project possible?
I think "it must be", otherwise how do people manage to make these cases in the first place. But before trying the experiment, I thought I would ask. Thank you, CBHA ( talk) 21:39, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
hello, on
this page here it reads (among other things): "As you can see, this puts 11 mV of DC across the load. If the load is 32 Ω at DC (...), 0.34 mA is forced through the load. This current can only come from the rail splitter, which looks like two parallel resistors to the load."
I just don't get how the two resistors can look as though they were in parallel, to anything. Do they because the two rails are the same point electrically (are they?) due to the (ideal) battery's internal resistance of 0?
Generally, what is the "algorithm", if there is one, for how to arrive from the
original circuit to this equivalent circuit (3rd box from the top
here)?
Thank you very much
Asmrulz (
talk)
23:19, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Science desk | ||
---|---|---|
< November 16 | << Oct | November | Dec >> | November 18 > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Science Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
Please see. Ben-Natan ( talk) 08:17, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
What actually happens to the soapy water that gets on the bathroom floor when people are washing their hands. Does the soap component just evaporate with water? Clover345 ( talk) 20:14, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Since the OP has taken to deleting responses to his/her questions, I am closing this discussion. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 17:24, 18 November 2014 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
If we compare times between altitudes, we see a gap time. (General Relativity) Why don't we see differences in the pictures of the skies ? Thank you for your answers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.194.81.188 ( talk • contribs)
Should there not be an accumulation of time ?
A stone on a mountain where we can find a telescope stays there since long time. We see the same thing as the stone. So there should be an accumulation of something relative to a billion of years. No ?
So your glock don't work as you see, or you don't have any time delay. (Sorry. I am not moving to the mountain. I wait on the mountain and then come back. Be more precise)
I am talking about gravitation not time travel. Or is the question the same ? If yes, please show me.
""If you are on top of a 5 km mountain you will see the light from distant stars slightly sooner than someone at sea level, solely because you are 5 km closer to the stars. The rough amount is 16 microseconds (5 km / speed of light), and that amount does not change or accumulate depending on how long you stay on the mountain. It only depends on the fact that the mountain is slightly closer to the stars."" I don't think it has something to do with the problem Think about a human that could have 1 billion years (stone) speaking to another one who just came at the end for 1 second. If I am not wrong there should be an accumulation BETWEEN two beams of stars. 50 nano between the beam at 0.00 and this at 24.00
person A become at 0.00 the Beam 1 (Altitude between A and B: 5km) B 0.00 Beam 1 A 24.00 Beam 2 B 23.00 (glock A) Beam 2 A see the stars at 24.00 B see the stars at 23.00 Difference between them is not distance but time stayed in gravitation. That is what says general relativity (1.00 = 50 nano). Then repeat it 1 billion years. Gap between stars 5 years.
Once again you speak about the distance between them (special relativity). Try if they see a second shooting star and compare the times (with a difference of gravitation between A and B). Say me if you don't want to answer me anymore.
I don't speak about the gravity of the beams but the gravity area of A and B. A and B are people at different altitudes.
To resume. Someone on a mountain who is 1 billion x 365 days old has 5 x 365 days more than someone (1 billion years old) who is 5km below. The difference of nights should be 5 years. The sky from one should be 5 years later than the other one.
Ok I begin to grasp. If time and day are sychronysed, how can someone become older than the other ? Hey guys, relativity means relativity (it means no time synchronization but referential synchronization). Has anyone read Einstein's work ?
High gravity on A, low gravity on B. :*Synchro0 : 00h00 on the two glocks. :*Synchro1 : 01h00 on glock A 00h59 on B. :*Synchro2 : sunrise, 02h00 on A 01h58 on B. :*Synchro3 : sunset, 06h00 on A 05h54 on B. The referential was A, now lets with B: :*Synchro0 : 00h00 on the two glocks. :*Synchro1 : 01h01 on glock A 01h00 on B. :*Synchro2 : sunrise, 02h02 on A 02h00 on B. :*Synchro3 : sunset, 06h06 on A 06h00 on B. B has to compare data with A at 6h00 for A. It means 5h54 for B Lets do it for a billion of years. |
i have got non polarized polyester capacitior which has "0.022K400V" printed on it. what is the value of cap in uF? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.223.145.15 ( talk • contribs) 21:20, 17 November 2014
I have carrying cases of this material which came with cordless drills. The drills are now obsolete or worn out and the batteries are no longer taking a charge.
But the cases are like new, aside from a bit of dust. It is too bad the tools were not as well-made as the cases.
I would like to reuse the cases to carry other things. Each side of the case has an outer shell and an inner "insert", molded to fit the original contents. Insert and outer shell are strongly joined together.
If it was possible to soften the insert with heat, it could be reshaped to fit other contents.
The question is, can this material be judiciously softened with heat using for example a small propane torch without it catching fire or giving off noxious fumes? Or to put it another way, is the temperature at which it would soften and become malleable far enough below the point at which it would burn, as to make my project possible?
I think "it must be", otherwise how do people manage to make these cases in the first place. But before trying the experiment, I thought I would ask. Thank you, CBHA ( talk) 21:39, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
hello, on
this page here it reads (among other things): "As you can see, this puts 11 mV of DC across the load. If the load is 32 Ω at DC (...), 0.34 mA is forced through the load. This current can only come from the rail splitter, which looks like two parallel resistors to the load."
I just don't get how the two resistors can look as though they were in parallel, to anything. Do they because the two rails are the same point electrically (are they?) due to the (ideal) battery's internal resistance of 0?
Generally, what is the "algorithm", if there is one, for how to arrive from the
original circuit to this equivalent circuit (3rd box from the top
here)?
Thank you very much
Asmrulz (
talk)
23:19, 17 November 2014 (UTC)