From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mathematics desk
< February 18 << Jan | February | Mar >> Current desk >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


February 19 Information

Cartesian product in constructive mathematics

Is there a constructive proof (i.e. a proof in constructive mathematics) of the fact that if a Cartesian product of sets is a singleton, then all of the sets are singletons? Classically, if is the unique element of the Cartesian product , and , then one can consider the family where and if , and from this deduce that , showing that is a singleton for all . GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 23:25, 19 February 2016 (UTC) reply

I may be missing something stupid but it seems like your proof works constructively. Let the Cartesian product be where is the tuple as a function on . I'll say is a singleton if , i.e. if . Then you want to prove . The proof is: given , take ; given , define ; then , so , so . -- BenRG ( talk) 03:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mathematics desk
< February 18 << Jan | February | Mar >> Current desk >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


February 19 Information

Cartesian product in constructive mathematics

Is there a constructive proof (i.e. a proof in constructive mathematics) of the fact that if a Cartesian product of sets is a singleton, then all of the sets are singletons? Classically, if is the unique element of the Cartesian product , and , then one can consider the family where and if , and from this deduce that , showing that is a singleton for all . GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 23:25, 19 February 2016 (UTC) reply

I may be missing something stupid but it seems like your proof works constructively. Let the Cartesian product be where is the tuple as a function on . I'll say is a singleton if , i.e. if . Then you want to prove . The proof is: given , take ; given , define ; then , so , so . -- BenRG ( talk) 03:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook