From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mathematics desk
< June 21 << May | June | Jul >> June 23 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


June 22 Information

Database attrition

I have a large database from which the records are deleted at the rate of 1/105 every seven years. If I pick five records at random, what is the expectation value for the time at which I will have only three records left? How long to go from three to two? Spinning Spark 23:51, 22 June 2012 (UTC) reply

See our article on exponential decay. Bo Jacoby ( talk) 11:53, 23 June 2012 (UTC). reply
When there are n records, and each decays at a rate of , together they decay at a rate of , thus it will take on average years to go to . Thus from 5 to 3 is 315,000 years and from 3 to 2 is 350,000 233,333.3. -- Meni Rosenfeld ( talk) 16:58, 24 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Thanks Meni, that's very helpful. Spinning Spark 23:54, 24 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Actually, shouldn't 3 to 2 (7/3) be 233,333 years? Spinning Spark 00:01, 25 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Right, fixed. -- Meni Rosenfeld ( talk) 09:27, 27 June 2012 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mathematics desk
< June 21 << May | June | Jul >> June 23 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


June 22 Information

Database attrition

I have a large database from which the records are deleted at the rate of 1/105 every seven years. If I pick five records at random, what is the expectation value for the time at which I will have only three records left? How long to go from three to two? Spinning Spark 23:51, 22 June 2012 (UTC) reply

See our article on exponential decay. Bo Jacoby ( talk) 11:53, 23 June 2012 (UTC). reply
When there are n records, and each decays at a rate of , together they decay at a rate of , thus it will take on average years to go to . Thus from 5 to 3 is 315,000 years and from 3 to 2 is 350,000 233,333.3. -- Meni Rosenfeld ( talk) 16:58, 24 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Thanks Meni, that's very helpful. Spinning Spark 23:54, 24 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Actually, shouldn't 3 to 2 (7/3) be 233,333 years? Spinning Spark 00:01, 25 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Right, fixed. -- Meni Rosenfeld ( talk) 09:27, 27 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook