Humanities desk | ||
---|---|---|
< April 29 | << Mar | April | May >> | Current desk > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Humanities Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
When did Antoine, Duke of Montpensier and/or his male-line descendants (the Orléans-Galliera line) give up their claim to the (now defunct) French throne? They're not in the Orléanist line of succession to the French throne right now even though Antoine's male line still exists right now (see here: List of living legitimate male Capetians#House of Orléans-Galliera). Thus, when exactly did Antoine and/or his male-line descendants give up their claim to the French throne? Futurist110 ( talk) 01:14, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Does the US Congress have the authority to create a constitution for Washington DC if so desired? Obviously this hypothetical Washington DC constitution would be subordinate to the US Constitution, if you're curious. Basically, it would be just like a state constitution, but for Washington DC. Futurist110 ( talk) 05:28, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
If the US went to war with say, China, would its supply chain of electronics, especially computers, be affected? How can the US make sure such an essential resource for the economy will still be available? Doroletho ( talk) 11:37, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
I been seeing all these image-memes on Facebook about how the U.S. government / Trump won't donate to Puerto Rico or Flint disasters, but they will to the Notre-Dame fire. Our article on Notre-Dame_de_Paris_fire#Fundraising shows a list and does not include the U.S. government, however, then I saw the table only goes down to 10M. Are there any tables that show significantly further less than 10M? 67.175.224.138 ( talk) 15:31, 30 April 2019 (UTC).
Do we currently have an article on governmental policy of forcible removal of children from parents and taking them to foster families instead (e.g. as described here in Sweden)? 212.180.235.46 ( talk) 20:55, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Child Protection Law in Sweden Today, the child welfare service in Sweden is regulated in the main ak of the Social Services Act (1980: 620, SoL) as is based on the volunteer and law (1990: 52) on special provisions on care of young people (LVU), which contains the sources for the use of force. SoL is essentially one framework law that specifies material standards for the municipality's social service. It contains few rules on the design of the social service or about child welfare in particular (Strömberg, 1999: 127). The case processing of forced decisions within barnevernet is regulated mainly by its own process laws for the administrative courts. Best reminders about coercion within the child welfare service were transferred to own law on the care of young people of 1988. Then it became a clearer distinction between volunteers decisions and forced decisions. A so-called holistic view was used. It meant that they various municipal committees as before had handled each of the old laws area, was merged into a committee, Socialnäman, who dealt with all kinds of cases. This however, was changed with the new communeloven of 1991 (the Local Government Act, 1991: 900) as introduced greater degree of municipal self-government. As long as they municipal tasks are carried out, the municipalities are now free to organize easily they want (Hammar, Norström and Thunved, 1998: 9). The social welfare committee consists mostly of 15-20 members. Municipal Control one determines the number members. At least half of the members must be present for the board to be quorum. Members have one vote each, and simple majority is sufficient to make decisions. The committee members can raise issues of their own initiative and the board meets if the mayor considers it necessary or a tr part of the committee members demand it. During the meeting, the committee members review the case documents. The private matters in one child welfare cases, possibly with lawyers, have re to meet personally before deciding on the case hit. It is not common to pray rn under 15 years are present. If they do private parties are present They asked if they have anything to add and get in that case or speak orally to the board. Parties' lawyers or representatives, as child welfare services service is usually represented by one by their officials (Social board The election, 1995: 30), chooses for himself e parts of the case they want to emphasize and at all mention below negotiations. According to the National Board of Health and Welfare's examination of cases from 1993, the social welfare committee was represented by lawyerin 31 of the 238 cases at court level. It was great geographical differences. In Stockholm, there was a public party lawyer in 69% of cases, while the figure for Gothenburg was 12 percent (Socialstyrelsen, 1995: 68). The same survey from 1993 shows that in four investigated county courts, the social welfare committee received average of 80% of cases. The locals the variations were great dishes between: from 50 to 97% (Socialstyrelsen, 1995: 70). DroneB ( talk) 23:56, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Humanities desk | ||
---|---|---|
< April 29 | << Mar | April | May >> | Current desk > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Humanities Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
When did Antoine, Duke of Montpensier and/or his male-line descendants (the Orléans-Galliera line) give up their claim to the (now defunct) French throne? They're not in the Orléanist line of succession to the French throne right now even though Antoine's male line still exists right now (see here: List of living legitimate male Capetians#House of Orléans-Galliera). Thus, when exactly did Antoine and/or his male-line descendants give up their claim to the French throne? Futurist110 ( talk) 01:14, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Does the US Congress have the authority to create a constitution for Washington DC if so desired? Obviously this hypothetical Washington DC constitution would be subordinate to the US Constitution, if you're curious. Basically, it would be just like a state constitution, but for Washington DC. Futurist110 ( talk) 05:28, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
If the US went to war with say, China, would its supply chain of electronics, especially computers, be affected? How can the US make sure such an essential resource for the economy will still be available? Doroletho ( talk) 11:37, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
I been seeing all these image-memes on Facebook about how the U.S. government / Trump won't donate to Puerto Rico or Flint disasters, but they will to the Notre-Dame fire. Our article on Notre-Dame_de_Paris_fire#Fundraising shows a list and does not include the U.S. government, however, then I saw the table only goes down to 10M. Are there any tables that show significantly further less than 10M? 67.175.224.138 ( talk) 15:31, 30 April 2019 (UTC).
Do we currently have an article on governmental policy of forcible removal of children from parents and taking them to foster families instead (e.g. as described here in Sweden)? 212.180.235.46 ( talk) 20:55, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Child Protection Law in Sweden Today, the child welfare service in Sweden is regulated in the main ak of the Social Services Act (1980: 620, SoL) as is based on the volunteer and law (1990: 52) on special provisions on care of young people (LVU), which contains the sources for the use of force. SoL is essentially one framework law that specifies material standards for the municipality's social service. It contains few rules on the design of the social service or about child welfare in particular (Strömberg, 1999: 127). The case processing of forced decisions within barnevernet is regulated mainly by its own process laws for the administrative courts. Best reminders about coercion within the child welfare service were transferred to own law on the care of young people of 1988. Then it became a clearer distinction between volunteers decisions and forced decisions. A so-called holistic view was used. It meant that they various municipal committees as before had handled each of the old laws area, was merged into a committee, Socialnäman, who dealt with all kinds of cases. This however, was changed with the new communeloven of 1991 (the Local Government Act, 1991: 900) as introduced greater degree of municipal self-government. As long as they municipal tasks are carried out, the municipalities are now free to organize easily they want (Hammar, Norström and Thunved, 1998: 9). The social welfare committee consists mostly of 15-20 members. Municipal Control one determines the number members. At least half of the members must be present for the board to be quorum. Members have one vote each, and simple majority is sufficient to make decisions. The committee members can raise issues of their own initiative and the board meets if the mayor considers it necessary or a tr part of the committee members demand it. During the meeting, the committee members review the case documents. The private matters in one child welfare cases, possibly with lawyers, have re to meet personally before deciding on the case hit. It is not common to pray rn under 15 years are present. If they do private parties are present They asked if they have anything to add and get in that case or speak orally to the board. Parties' lawyers or representatives, as child welfare services service is usually represented by one by their officials (Social board The election, 1995: 30), chooses for himself e parts of the case they want to emphasize and at all mention below negotiations. According to the National Board of Health and Welfare's examination of cases from 1993, the social welfare committee was represented by lawyerin 31 of the 238 cases at court level. It was great geographical differences. In Stockholm, there was a public party lawyer in 69% of cases, while the figure for Gothenburg was 12 percent (Socialstyrelsen, 1995: 68). The same survey from 1993 shows that in four investigated county courts, the social welfare committee received average of 80% of cases. The locals the variations were great dishes between: from 50 to 97% (Socialstyrelsen, 1995: 70). DroneB ( talk) 23:56, 30 April 2019 (UTC)