Entertainment desk | ||
---|---|---|
< August 14 | << Jul | August | Sep >> | August 16 > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Entertainment Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
Recently 22 kicks from the penalty mark were required to settle a nervy two-legged encounter between Danish and Serbian champion, respectively. A player from the home team, one of many who skied his effort as the penalty mark deteriorated, wondered in the aftermath as to why the referee never moved to the opposite goal. The 14th Law of the Game states that the goal may be changed only if it becomes unusable.
That's a very poor wording. Does "it" only include the goal, as in posts and net, or the mark as well? Splićanin ( talk) 17:48, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I was looking at a decade-old document. Thank you for clarification.
With that in mind, I'd say that the ref was at fault. Whenever a kicker placed his pivot foot next to the ball a moment before whacking it, the ball would noticeably move. I believe that was the reason for several Row Z efforts, as the kicking foot would either dig underneath the soft soil or make contact with the ball way off the intended spot because of the, well, landslide. Splićanin ( talk) 20:31, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Entertainment desk | ||
---|---|---|
< August 14 | << Jul | August | Sep >> | August 16 > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Entertainment Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
Recently 22 kicks from the penalty mark were required to settle a nervy two-legged encounter between Danish and Serbian champion, respectively. A player from the home team, one of many who skied his effort as the penalty mark deteriorated, wondered in the aftermath as to why the referee never moved to the opposite goal. The 14th Law of the Game states that the goal may be changed only if it becomes unusable.
That's a very poor wording. Does "it" only include the goal, as in posts and net, or the mark as well? Splićanin ( talk) 17:48, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I was looking at a decade-old document. Thank you for clarification.
With that in mind, I'd say that the ref was at fault. Whenever a kicker placed his pivot foot next to the ball a moment before whacking it, the ball would noticeably move. I believe that was the reason for several Row Z efforts, as the kicking foot would either dig underneath the soft soil or make contact with the ball way off the intended spot because of the, well, landslide. Splićanin ( talk) 20:31, 15 August 2019 (UTC)