The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:29, 24 December 2023 (UTC) reply

• Future FIFA Club World Cup (China) → 2025 FIFA Club World Cup  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

The 2025 edition will be held in the United States, not China. This is an extremely unlikely title to be looked up. The few articles that link here can easily be pointed to 2025 FIFA Club World Cup. —  Jkudlick ⚓  (talk) 18:54, 17 December 2023 (UTC) EDIT: Forgot to mention that I am requesting deletion. 19:01, 17 December 2023 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. —  Jkudlick ⚓  (talk) 18:58, 17 December 2023 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom. Giant Snowman 19:03, 17 December 2023 (UTC) reply
• Delete: Misleading since China was scheduled to host a cancelled 2021 event. Not a sensible search term for the 2025 event which will be in the US. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 20:51, 17 December 2023 (UTC) reply
• Delete, there is no sensible target. BLAIXX 21:29, 17 December 2023 (UTC) reply
• Delete per above -- Lenticel ^{( talk)} 01:18, 18 December 2023 (UTC) reply
• Delete due to lack of a good target; the current target is definitely a bad match. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs) 18:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
• Delete – Per all above. Svartner ( talk) 17:42, 23 December 2023 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was agreement to retarget. There is consensus to retarget to WP:Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion. The editor doing the retarget would need to sort through the incoming links and determine whether they are referring to WP:SPAM or WP:PROMO. And also hatnote to WP:SPAM from the new target. Jay 💬 13:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC) reply

• Wikipedia:PROMOTE → Wikipedia:Spam  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

It should have the same target as Wikipedia:Promotion. Veverve ( talk) 10:42, 17 December 2023 (UTC) reply

• Sounds fine to me; but someone would need to sort through all the preceding uses of this link, and determine whether they are referring to WP:SPAM or WP:PROMO. Arbitrarily0 ^{( talk)} 13:53, 17 December 2023 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox_or_means_of_promotion but add a hatnote to Wikipedia:Spam to this new target -- Lenticel ^{( talk)} 01:20, 18 December 2023 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).