This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 17, 2019.
A misleading redirect forcing the reader into a single instance - the national version of the US based party. The more useful page is Democratic Party - a dab page with numerous entries. Part of the mass creation of portal spam titles. Delete it or redirect to the mainspace DAB page. Legacypac ( talk) 23:43, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 26#Allergology
Procedural nomination, as this has a RfD tag but apparently never got discussed. There is a related discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_January_6#Polyisobutene (which looking at the dates an nominators was likely to include this redirect too). I presume the possible outcomes include retargeting, deleting, and creating a new article. See also: User_talk:Thryduulf#Polyisobutylene_(2) Nabla ( talk) 20:35, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 25#Tater salad
This does not seem like the best target for a highly general common adverb. I would retarget to Effectiveness, or, as a second choice, disambiguate. bd2412 T 17:18, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
I am not sure why this hypothetical copernicium compound redirects to a compound of its homolog mercury, where there is only a very brief mention. Wouldn't the article about the element (specifically Copernicium#Chemical) be a more relevant target? ComplexRational ( talk) 01:12, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
错误重定向。 Ngguls ( talk) 09:20, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 25#2019 Venezuelan power grid sabotage
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 25#2019 Venezuelan power grid attack
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 26#Brussels bombing
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 25#Draughtsman
The year 2018 has already passed and we're in 2019 right now. Having an article that simply redirects to a "main page" simply makes zero sense. NotCory ( talk) 09:19, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
I was very surprised to end up at Barcode from this term as I was expecting an article or section about the plain language summaries of legal licence texts (e.g. Creative Commons licences). The history makes it clear why the terms redirect here - it was originally a stub reading, in its entirety, "The Human Readable Interpretation is the information contained into a linear barcode, which is shown in readable characters under or over this." which was merged rather than deleted. However this information is not in the current version of the barcode article at all, let alone using the phrase "human-readable". I can't help but feel that this should either be a disambiguation page or retargetted somewhere but I haven't currently found any great candidates for either so I'm bringing it here for discussion. Thryduulf ( talk) 21:21, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 25#Duggardesh
Bad target: Simon Gibbons is just a member of the editorial board, along with several other people. Gibbons isn't any more special than any other members here. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 08:24, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Misnomer/non- existent variants. The F-86D is a separate model from the F-86F, and is covered in a separate article, North American F-86D Sabre, rather than the main F-86 article, North American F-86 Sabre, which covers the F-86F model. BilCat ( talk) 07:28, 17 March 2019 (UTC) For the record, I was not able notify the redirect's creator, as User:Ktr101 is globally banned, and his talk page is fully protected. - BilCat ( talk) 07:37, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Redirect from massively ambiguous title to one name: Pete Buttigieg. Wikipedia has articles on a 7 mayors named "Pete" (including Pete Buttigieg), and to 138 other mayors who first names begin with "Peter", any or all of whom may be known by the common abbreviation "Pete". (Full list on the talk page: WT:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 17#Mayor_Pete).
We could in theory convert this to a disambiguation page, but is really a good use of editorial time to create and maintain several thousand "JobTitle Firstname" disambiguation pages? It would require huge ongoing effort to keep them up to-date, and I think that readers would be better served by searching. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 02:54, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 17, 2019.
A misleading redirect forcing the reader into a single instance - the national version of the US based party. The more useful page is Democratic Party - a dab page with numerous entries. Part of the mass creation of portal spam titles. Delete it or redirect to the mainspace DAB page. Legacypac ( talk) 23:43, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 26#Allergology
Procedural nomination, as this has a RfD tag but apparently never got discussed. There is a related discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_January_6#Polyisobutene (which looking at the dates an nominators was likely to include this redirect too). I presume the possible outcomes include retargeting, deleting, and creating a new article. See also: User_talk:Thryduulf#Polyisobutylene_(2) Nabla ( talk) 20:35, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 25#Tater salad
This does not seem like the best target for a highly general common adverb. I would retarget to Effectiveness, or, as a second choice, disambiguate. bd2412 T 17:18, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
I am not sure why this hypothetical copernicium compound redirects to a compound of its homolog mercury, where there is only a very brief mention. Wouldn't the article about the element (specifically Copernicium#Chemical) be a more relevant target? ComplexRational ( talk) 01:12, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
错误重定向。 Ngguls ( talk) 09:20, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 25#2019 Venezuelan power grid sabotage
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 25#2019 Venezuelan power grid attack
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 26#Brussels bombing
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 25#Draughtsman
The year 2018 has already passed and we're in 2019 right now. Having an article that simply redirects to a "main page" simply makes zero sense. NotCory ( talk) 09:19, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
I was very surprised to end up at Barcode from this term as I was expecting an article or section about the plain language summaries of legal licence texts (e.g. Creative Commons licences). The history makes it clear why the terms redirect here - it was originally a stub reading, in its entirety, "The Human Readable Interpretation is the information contained into a linear barcode, which is shown in readable characters under or over this." which was merged rather than deleted. However this information is not in the current version of the barcode article at all, let alone using the phrase "human-readable". I can't help but feel that this should either be a disambiguation page or retargetted somewhere but I haven't currently found any great candidates for either so I'm bringing it here for discussion. Thryduulf ( talk) 21:21, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 25#Duggardesh
Bad target: Simon Gibbons is just a member of the editorial board, along with several other people. Gibbons isn't any more special than any other members here. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 08:24, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Misnomer/non- existent variants. The F-86D is a separate model from the F-86F, and is covered in a separate article, North American F-86D Sabre, rather than the main F-86 article, North American F-86 Sabre, which covers the F-86F model. BilCat ( talk) 07:28, 17 March 2019 (UTC) For the record, I was not able notify the redirect's creator, as User:Ktr101 is globally banned, and his talk page is fully protected. - BilCat ( talk) 07:37, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Redirect from massively ambiguous title to one name: Pete Buttigieg. Wikipedia has articles on a 7 mayors named "Pete" (including Pete Buttigieg), and to 138 other mayors who first names begin with "Peter", any or all of whom may be known by the common abbreviation "Pete". (Full list on the talk page: WT:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 17#Mayor_Pete).
We could in theory convert this to a disambiguation page, but is really a good use of editorial time to create and maintain several thousand "JobTitle Firstname" disambiguation pages? It would require huge ongoing effort to keep them up to-date, and I think that readers would be better served by searching. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 02:54, 17 March 2019 (UTC)