This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 14, 2019.
Rito (race)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 03:24, 23 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Improperly disambiguated; it would require the (fictional race) to clarify that it is not in fact a real race. Confusing redirect, should be deleted. ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 23:49, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Legendary Blade
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 03:24, 23 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Overly vague of a fantasy term to point here. ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 23:45, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete, too vague. Noble Sword gets a mention in a character bio but not in the article for the game it appears in. Cannot justify a redirect. —
Xezbeth (
talk) 06:27, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
RasPutin
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 03:24, 23 July 2019 (UTC)reply
This is an unlikely typo of Rasputin. It receives a fair number of pageviews because it is the first likely option listed in the popup window when someone searches for "rasputin" (looking for Grigori Rasputin). It appears this redirect is actually suppressing the much-more-appropriate "Rasputin" in the search popup.
CThomas3 (
talk) 23:27, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete, implausible typo, unless someone can explain some Russian-language use I'm unaware of?
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 09:21, 16 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Recurring enemies in The Legend of Zelda series
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The Legend of Zelda: Four Swords subseries characters
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 03:24, 23 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The use of "subseries" here makes it implausible as a redirect. ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 23:22, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
List of Tingle-related characters
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix(
talk) 20:17, 25 July 2019 (UTC)reply
While the content has actually been merged into
Tingle, this is an implausible redirect and looking at the pageviews, almost no one searches for such a specific list. ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 23:12, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete all A term that is near-impossible to search if doing research on the subject. Also, "Tingle" can mean more than the character.
AmericanAir88(
talk) 17:45, 25 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep. Of the list of Mohammad Irfans at the disambiguation page, there are 6 cricketers, and I follow StAnselm's logic. I've made a new, more comprehensive, hatnote at the base name (and also deleted invalid entries from the dab page).
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 09:28, 16 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep per StAnselm's comment.
Utopes (
talk) 17:53, 18 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Ferrari 850 Monza
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:34, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
No such car existed. No reason for anyone to search for it. Nearest correct name is Ferrari 860 Monza.
YBSOne (
talk) 21:08, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Ferrari 315 MM
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:34, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
No such car existed. No reason for anyone to search for it. Correct name is Ferrari 315 S.
YBSOne (
talk) 21:04, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep, harmless, reasonably likely typos. —Kusma (
t·
c) 17:45, 18 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep for the same logic as Kusma, forgetting a space is a common misspelling to make, and it would be reasonable to think that these redirects are still used.
Utopes (
talk) 17:59, 18 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep, forgetting a space isn't hard to do, regardless of where the space is. In this redirect, the missing space happens to be at "r.m", which I bet at least one person has typed before, hence the existence of the redirect. I see no problems here.
Utopes (
talk) 17:48, 18 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Queen Victoria I
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep This isn't about CRYSTAL, but plausible redirects and pipes. "Vict. I" for instance would be in the name of legislation passed in 1837–8 and might be linked from an article about such legislation. As for the others, just because we know there is no I without II, doesn't mean that all editors ever seeking to link to Victoria in passing know that. DBD 20:24, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep. These are plausible because it's common in some realms to use "the first" even if there is only a single ruler with this name. See
Regnal number#"The first" for more information. --
Tavix(
talk) 21:40, 17 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep, Queen Victoria is still the first Victoria, regardless if there aren't any more after or not. The redirects are fine.
Utopes (
talk) 17:49, 18 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Arnold S.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:33, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete far to many possibilities an no evidence that anyone is regularly know by this bane.--
64.229.166.98 (
talk) 20:15, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete Blatant violation of redirects.
AmericanAir88(
talk) 16:11, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. This redirect may cause confusion.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 09:41, 16 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete, but is there not a disambiguation page that could help out here?
Utopes (
talk) 17:40, 18 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Tarid
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:33, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. "Tarid" has several other uses in enwiki, and this redirect impedes Search.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 09:45, 16 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
David Peckham
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:33, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
GiantSnowman 10:18, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, when you Google search 'David Peckham' nothing about this person is on the first page.
GiantSnowman 10:19, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. This redirect may cause confusion.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 09:45, 16 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Tont
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:33, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
A middle name is not a helpful redirect if the target is not known by the middle name. — the Man in Question(in question) 19:50, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete It would appear to be a highly improbable search term. Eldrick I get, as I hear sports talk personalities use that pretty regularly. But never once have I heard him referred to as Tont.
CThomas3 (
talk) 01:18, 16 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. This redirect may cause confusion.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 09:46, 16 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete, as the target article is not commonly referred to by the name in the redirect, i.e. Tiger Woods isn't referred to as Tont.
Utopes (
talk) 17:41, 18 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Mr. Aaron
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The film in question does have an article and the term is mentioned so redireting to
Lonely Street (film) is a viable option.--
64.229.166.98 (
talk) 20:00, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
It's the second line for cast, so if he's a principal character I think a redirect is perfectly fine
WhisperToMe (
talk) 21:19, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
But again, the film itself is obscure. It is not normal to create redirects for characters in obscure films. It opens up a Pandora's Box of unused redirects. The minimal use that this redirect has had comes from its having formerly been linked in the film's article (until I corrected the link). — the Man in Question(in question) 21:37, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Some obscure arthouse films are seen by relatively few but get a bit of scholarly attention. If a journal article or book chapter has critical commentary on Mr. Aaron, it could warrant that being linked from
Aaron (surname) ...
WhisperToMe (
talk) 05:52, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
I'd be okay with retargeting this to
Aaron (surname), since it could refer to many people listed there. -
Eureka Lott 03:20, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
That sounds like a great idea!
WhisperToMe (
talk) 05:52, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
But do we really want to encourage "Mr."-style redirects? Any surname disambig on Wikipedia could have "Mrs.", "Mrs.", etc. added to it. And, I think most importantly, is anyone with the surname Aaron actually widely known as Mr. Aaron? — the Man in Question(in question) 22:20, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. Potentially ambiguous and maycause confusion.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 09:48, 16 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
Aaron (surname) where one can find all the notable people who may be called "Mr. Aaron". --
Tavix(
talk) 21:49, 17 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Elvis McPresley
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:32, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Elvis Pres;ey
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. --
BDD (
talk) 21:13, 24 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Weak keep.l and ; are right next to each other on the
QWERTY keyboard. Though, it makes me wonder why this isn't E;vis Pres;ey then... and why that specific typo? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ –MJL‐Talk‐☖ 02:16, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete mistakes such as this are obvious, and can be corrected.
Peter James (
talk) 22:48, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep per {{R from misspelling}}. Redirects take people where they want to go, and it's obvious that someone typing this is wanting the article for
Elvis Presley. --
Tavix(
talk) 21:42, 17 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep, the redirect is a plausible typo that could be encountered, even if it has never been encountered by anyone here. The two characters are a button away, and should stay as a redirect.
Utopes (
talk) 17:44, 18 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. If they can type the "l" in "Elvis", they can type the "l" in "Presley". This is unlikely because it requires missing the "l" once instead of twice.
Steel1943 (
talk) 01:20, 22 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Elvis Pres
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:32, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Not a name he is referred to by; not a useful typo. Half-entered search results awaiting autocomplete do not make good redirects. — the Man in Question(in question) 19:46, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Merlin Monroe
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:32, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. Marilyn was not known by this name, and this redirect may cause confusion.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 09:53, 16 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Ferrari 118L
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:32, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
No such car existed. Correct name is Ferrari 118 LM (which already exist as a redirect).
YBSOne (
talk) 19:44, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Presedent Lincon
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:30, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
JEsus
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:30, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Unhelpful capitalization errors. Anyone searching for these will be taken to the correct page regardless of how they capitalize it. — the Man in Question(in question) 19:42, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
I find a second capital to be a likely error, so unless technically this is unnecessary, I think this is a good idea to keep.
Debresser (
talk) 15:02, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Likely and common misspellings, and JEsus actually reminds me of the 16th century German tradition of writing "HErr" and "GOtt" for "Lord" and "God". But I don't know whether that has been done in English, ever. However, if these redirects don't exist, the software automatically redirects search entries, so the only issue is links. Given the low use I'd say delete both to let the software work its magic. —Kusma (
t·
c) 15:59, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Barack Obama.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:30, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Useless S. Grant
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:30, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete probably a joke --
Lenticel(
talk) 01:21, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Vladimir Poutine
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep: common misspelling.
Valmi ✒ 01:58, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
I am curious, do you have evidence for that, or at least a basis? Remember Poutine is the French spelling of his name, which is why there are many search results on Google (WP:FORRED). In English the name is pronounced /ˈpuːtɪn/ or /ˈpjuːtɪn/, neither of which is likely to be misspelled Poutine. — the Man in Question(in question) 20:39, 17 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Weak keep. I agree with
Valmi that it is common, but not as a misspelling. For example, searching
"Vladimir Poutine" on Wikipedia gives 19 articles in which the name is mentioned. Given the significant
French–Russian relations, of which Mr. Poutine/Putin is a key part of, I think this lends just enough affinity to satisfy
WP:RFOREIGN. Someone may stumble across "Vladimir Poutine" in that context and want to find out who this is—the target gives the answer that it's Vladimir Putin. --
Tavix(
talk) 22:52, 17 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Mousie Dung
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:29, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Ferrari 250 gt
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Using incorrect names without spaces and/or without capitals, cannot be moved to correct name because they already exists, no links to those pages. Removing those redirects will force editors to use proper name ie 250 GT. Please consider deletion.
YBSOne (
talk) 19:24, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep the 250GT redirect, not obvious that there would be a space.
Peter James (
talk) 22:50, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Sakhar
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Also restored the previous redirects from moves. --
JHunterJ (
talk) 14:19, 22 July 2019 (UTC)reply
It is not clear from the target why this (misspelling?) redirects here.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 19:20, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
From looking at
d:Q7402923, this may be a valid variant. If you look at the history of the nominated page, it used to be a disambiguation page that included a link to
Sakhar, Nepal. That article was subsequently moved to
Sankhar, Nepal and then to
Sankhar. I can't explain why the former titles were deleted. -
Eureka Lott 20:03, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The census reference uses this spelling - if they are the same place there should be a redirect.
Peter James (
talk) 22:59, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Ferrari 290MM
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Using incorrect name without spaces, cannot be moved to correct name because it already exists, no links to this page. Removing this redirect will force editors to use proper name ie 290 MM. Please consider deletion.
YBSOne (
talk) 19:16, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Jumpy bugs
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:29, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Not mentioned at target. Internet searches aren't showing any association of this very vague and informal term with any particular group of "bugs".
Plantdrew (
talk) 17:15, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia.
PC78 (
talk) 17:44, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. This redirect may cause confusion.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 18:27, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
El Camino High School (disambiguation page)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Omega System
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
@
AngusWOOF:I was considering it, but there is nothing specifically called "Omega System", so it would just be confusing.ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 20:52, 6 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Steel1943 (
talk) 16:21, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Chaos (Xenosaga Character)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:29, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Xenosaga lists
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:29, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Unnecessarily vague redirect; there are no longer multiple lists for the series. ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 13:19, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Anti-drug campaigns
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
TheSandDoctorTalk 05:51, 22 July 2019 (UTC)reply
General redirect to a specific target. A bit misleading: obviously "drug" refers to more than just cannabis/marijuana, and there are many campaigns against all sorts of drugs other than cannabis/marijuana. I don't necessarily want to see this redirect deleted, as it is potentially useful. And a reader might still find certain anti-drug campaigns among those listed in the target (perhaps the list should be split?) So ideally, I would prefer to have this redirect point to a better target if one can be found. -- Ϫ 05:26, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment/question: Is there a generic higher-level article that identifies organizations such as
Drug Abuse Resistance Education? Obviously, the current target is inaccurate since the term "drugs" is not exclusive to "cannabis".
Steel1943 (
talk) 23:45, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete to encourage article creation. I see a
template and a
category, but no overview article. I think deletion would be preferable to a
WP:CNR. -
Eureka Lott 03:04, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 14, 2019.
Rito (race)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 03:24, 23 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Improperly disambiguated; it would require the (fictional race) to clarify that it is not in fact a real race. Confusing redirect, should be deleted. ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 23:49, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Legendary Blade
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 03:24, 23 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Overly vague of a fantasy term to point here. ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 23:45, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete, too vague. Noble Sword gets a mention in a character bio but not in the article for the game it appears in. Cannot justify a redirect. —
Xezbeth (
talk) 06:27, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
RasPutin
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 03:24, 23 July 2019 (UTC)reply
This is an unlikely typo of Rasputin. It receives a fair number of pageviews because it is the first likely option listed in the popup window when someone searches for "rasputin" (looking for Grigori Rasputin). It appears this redirect is actually suppressing the much-more-appropriate "Rasputin" in the search popup.
CThomas3 (
talk) 23:27, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete, implausible typo, unless someone can explain some Russian-language use I'm unaware of?
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 09:21, 16 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Recurring enemies in The Legend of Zelda series
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The Legend of Zelda: Four Swords subseries characters
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 03:24, 23 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The use of "subseries" here makes it implausible as a redirect. ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 23:22, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
List of Tingle-related characters
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix(
talk) 20:17, 25 July 2019 (UTC)reply
While the content has actually been merged into
Tingle, this is an implausible redirect and looking at the pageviews, almost no one searches for such a specific list. ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 23:12, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete all A term that is near-impossible to search if doing research on the subject. Also, "Tingle" can mean more than the character.
AmericanAir88(
talk) 17:45, 25 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep. Of the list of Mohammad Irfans at the disambiguation page, there are 6 cricketers, and I follow StAnselm's logic. I've made a new, more comprehensive, hatnote at the base name (and also deleted invalid entries from the dab page).
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 09:28, 16 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep per StAnselm's comment.
Utopes (
talk) 17:53, 18 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Ferrari 850 Monza
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:34, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
No such car existed. No reason for anyone to search for it. Nearest correct name is Ferrari 860 Monza.
YBSOne (
talk) 21:08, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Ferrari 315 MM
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:34, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
No such car existed. No reason for anyone to search for it. Correct name is Ferrari 315 S.
YBSOne (
talk) 21:04, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep, harmless, reasonably likely typos. —Kusma (
t·
c) 17:45, 18 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep for the same logic as Kusma, forgetting a space is a common misspelling to make, and it would be reasonable to think that these redirects are still used.
Utopes (
talk) 17:59, 18 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep, forgetting a space isn't hard to do, regardless of where the space is. In this redirect, the missing space happens to be at "r.m", which I bet at least one person has typed before, hence the existence of the redirect. I see no problems here.
Utopes (
talk) 17:48, 18 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Queen Victoria I
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep This isn't about CRYSTAL, but plausible redirects and pipes. "Vict. I" for instance would be in the name of legislation passed in 1837–8 and might be linked from an article about such legislation. As for the others, just because we know there is no I without II, doesn't mean that all editors ever seeking to link to Victoria in passing know that. DBD 20:24, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep. These are plausible because it's common in some realms to use "the first" even if there is only a single ruler with this name. See
Regnal number#"The first" for more information. --
Tavix(
talk) 21:40, 17 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep, Queen Victoria is still the first Victoria, regardless if there aren't any more after or not. The redirects are fine.
Utopes (
talk) 17:49, 18 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Arnold S.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:33, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete far to many possibilities an no evidence that anyone is regularly know by this bane.--
64.229.166.98 (
talk) 20:15, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete Blatant violation of redirects.
AmericanAir88(
talk) 16:11, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. This redirect may cause confusion.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 09:41, 16 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete, but is there not a disambiguation page that could help out here?
Utopes (
talk) 17:40, 18 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Tarid
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:33, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. "Tarid" has several other uses in enwiki, and this redirect impedes Search.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 09:45, 16 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
David Peckham
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:33, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
GiantSnowman 10:18, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, when you Google search 'David Peckham' nothing about this person is on the first page.
GiantSnowman 10:19, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. This redirect may cause confusion.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 09:45, 16 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Tont
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:33, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
A middle name is not a helpful redirect if the target is not known by the middle name. — the Man in Question(in question) 19:50, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete It would appear to be a highly improbable search term. Eldrick I get, as I hear sports talk personalities use that pretty regularly. But never once have I heard him referred to as Tont.
CThomas3 (
talk) 01:18, 16 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. This redirect may cause confusion.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 09:46, 16 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete, as the target article is not commonly referred to by the name in the redirect, i.e. Tiger Woods isn't referred to as Tont.
Utopes (
talk) 17:41, 18 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Mr. Aaron
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The film in question does have an article and the term is mentioned so redireting to
Lonely Street (film) is a viable option.--
64.229.166.98 (
talk) 20:00, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
It's the second line for cast, so if he's a principal character I think a redirect is perfectly fine
WhisperToMe (
talk) 21:19, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
But again, the film itself is obscure. It is not normal to create redirects for characters in obscure films. It opens up a Pandora's Box of unused redirects. The minimal use that this redirect has had comes from its having formerly been linked in the film's article (until I corrected the link). — the Man in Question(in question) 21:37, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Some obscure arthouse films are seen by relatively few but get a bit of scholarly attention. If a journal article or book chapter has critical commentary on Mr. Aaron, it could warrant that being linked from
Aaron (surname) ...
WhisperToMe (
talk) 05:52, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
I'd be okay with retargeting this to
Aaron (surname), since it could refer to many people listed there. -
Eureka Lott 03:20, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
That sounds like a great idea!
WhisperToMe (
talk) 05:52, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
But do we really want to encourage "Mr."-style redirects? Any surname disambig on Wikipedia could have "Mrs.", "Mrs.", etc. added to it. And, I think most importantly, is anyone with the surname Aaron actually widely known as Mr. Aaron? — the Man in Question(in question) 22:20, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. Potentially ambiguous and maycause confusion.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 09:48, 16 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
Aaron (surname) where one can find all the notable people who may be called "Mr. Aaron". --
Tavix(
talk) 21:49, 17 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Elvis McPresley
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:32, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Elvis Pres;ey
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. --
BDD (
talk) 21:13, 24 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Weak keep.l and ; are right next to each other on the
QWERTY keyboard. Though, it makes me wonder why this isn't E;vis Pres;ey then... and why that specific typo? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ –MJL‐Talk‐☖ 02:16, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete mistakes such as this are obvious, and can be corrected.
Peter James (
talk) 22:48, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep per {{R from misspelling}}. Redirects take people where they want to go, and it's obvious that someone typing this is wanting the article for
Elvis Presley. --
Tavix(
talk) 21:42, 17 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep, the redirect is a plausible typo that could be encountered, even if it has never been encountered by anyone here. The two characters are a button away, and should stay as a redirect.
Utopes (
talk) 17:44, 18 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. If they can type the "l" in "Elvis", they can type the "l" in "Presley". This is unlikely because it requires missing the "l" once instead of twice.
Steel1943 (
talk) 01:20, 22 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Elvis Pres
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:32, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Not a name he is referred to by; not a useful typo. Half-entered search results awaiting autocomplete do not make good redirects. — the Man in Question(in question) 19:46, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Merlin Monroe
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:32, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. Marilyn was not known by this name, and this redirect may cause confusion.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 09:53, 16 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Ferrari 118L
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:32, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
No such car existed. Correct name is Ferrari 118 LM (which already exist as a redirect).
YBSOne (
talk) 19:44, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Presedent Lincon
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:30, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
JEsus
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:30, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Unhelpful capitalization errors. Anyone searching for these will be taken to the correct page regardless of how they capitalize it. — the Man in Question(in question) 19:42, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
I find a second capital to be a likely error, so unless technically this is unnecessary, I think this is a good idea to keep.
Debresser (
talk) 15:02, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Likely and common misspellings, and JEsus actually reminds me of the 16th century German tradition of writing "HErr" and "GOtt" for "Lord" and "God". But I don't know whether that has been done in English, ever. However, if these redirects don't exist, the software automatically redirects search entries, so the only issue is links. Given the low use I'd say delete both to let the software work its magic. —Kusma (
t·
c) 15:59, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Barack Obama.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:30, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Useless S. Grant
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:30, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete probably a joke --
Lenticel(
talk) 01:21, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Vladimir Poutine
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep: common misspelling.
Valmi ✒ 01:58, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
I am curious, do you have evidence for that, or at least a basis? Remember Poutine is the French spelling of his name, which is why there are many search results on Google (WP:FORRED). In English the name is pronounced /ˈpuːtɪn/ or /ˈpjuːtɪn/, neither of which is likely to be misspelled Poutine. — the Man in Question(in question) 20:39, 17 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Weak keep. I agree with
Valmi that it is common, but not as a misspelling. For example, searching
"Vladimir Poutine" on Wikipedia gives 19 articles in which the name is mentioned. Given the significant
French–Russian relations, of which Mr. Poutine/Putin is a key part of, I think this lends just enough affinity to satisfy
WP:RFOREIGN. Someone may stumble across "Vladimir Poutine" in that context and want to find out who this is—the target gives the answer that it's Vladimir Putin. --
Tavix(
talk) 22:52, 17 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Mousie Dung
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:29, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Ferrari 250 gt
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Using incorrect names without spaces and/or without capitals, cannot be moved to correct name because they already exists, no links to those pages. Removing those redirects will force editors to use proper name ie 250 GT. Please consider deletion.
YBSOne (
talk) 19:24, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep the 250GT redirect, not obvious that there would be a space.
Peter James (
talk) 22:50, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Sakhar
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Also restored the previous redirects from moves. --
JHunterJ (
talk) 14:19, 22 July 2019 (UTC)reply
It is not clear from the target why this (misspelling?) redirects here.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 19:20, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
From looking at
d:Q7402923, this may be a valid variant. If you look at the history of the nominated page, it used to be a disambiguation page that included a link to
Sakhar, Nepal. That article was subsequently moved to
Sankhar, Nepal and then to
Sankhar. I can't explain why the former titles were deleted. -
Eureka Lott 20:03, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The census reference uses this spelling - if they are the same place there should be a redirect.
Peter James (
talk) 22:59, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Ferrari 290MM
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Using incorrect name without spaces, cannot be moved to correct name because it already exists, no links to this page. Removing this redirect will force editors to use proper name ie 290 MM. Please consider deletion.
YBSOne (
talk) 19:16, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Jumpy bugs
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:29, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Not mentioned at target. Internet searches aren't showing any association of this very vague and informal term with any particular group of "bugs".
Plantdrew (
talk) 17:15, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia.
PC78 (
talk) 17:44, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. This redirect may cause confusion.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 18:27, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
El Camino High School (disambiguation page)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Omega System
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
@
AngusWOOF:I was considering it, but there is nothing specifically called "Omega System", so it would just be confusing.ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 20:52, 6 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Steel1943 (
talk) 16:21, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Chaos (Xenosaga Character)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:29, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Xenosaga lists
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 22:29, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Unnecessarily vague redirect; there are no longer multiple lists for the series. ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 13:19, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Anti-drug campaigns
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
TheSandDoctorTalk 05:51, 22 July 2019 (UTC)reply
General redirect to a specific target. A bit misleading: obviously "drug" refers to more than just cannabis/marijuana, and there are many campaigns against all sorts of drugs other than cannabis/marijuana. I don't necessarily want to see this redirect deleted, as it is potentially useful. And a reader might still find certain anti-drug campaigns among those listed in the target (perhaps the list should be split?) So ideally, I would prefer to have this redirect point to a better target if one can be found. -- Ϫ 05:26, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment/question: Is there a generic higher-level article that identifies organizations such as
Drug Abuse Resistance Education? Obviously, the current target is inaccurate since the term "drugs" is not exclusive to "cannabis".
Steel1943 (
talk) 23:45, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete to encourage article creation. I see a
template and a
category, but no overview article. I think deletion would be preferable to a
WP:CNR. -
Eureka Lott 03:04, 15 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.