The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 10:43, 12 December 2018 (UTC) reply

• Batdude → Batman  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not a genuine name or nickname, so naturally it's not mentioned at the target article. — Xezbeth ( talk) 08:34, 25 November 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom; used in one porn parody and some other books where that don't seem to be referencing batman; no information present for a reader looking for "batdude". Galobtter ( pingó mió) 10:02, 12 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Renominate if another topic known as "Fronberg" is created. (non-admin closure) feminist ( talk) 04:21, 12 December 2018 (UTC) reply

• Fronberg → Schloss Fronberg  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Ambiguous redirect; subject could also refer to a surname which is not notable for the encyclopedia. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 18:54, 4 December 2018 (UTC) reply

• Keep. The surname is not notable, as you mention, so there is no reason to reserve a redlink for that purpose. The castle is the only article that could plausibly be referred to as "Fronberg". -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 19:01, 4 December 2018 (UTC) reply
• Keep per Tavix. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 14:19, 7 December 2018 (UTC) reply
• Keep - Reasonable {{ r from surname}}. —  Godsy ^{( TALK} _CONT) 17:40, 10 December 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Comment It can't be a {{ R from surname}} as the target isn't even about a person. At best, the current redirect is a {{ R from short name}} as from German "schloss" or "schloß" translates to "castle", which is what the article is about. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 17:46, 10 December 2018 (UTC) reply
    • Named after the "Kunsberg von Fronberg" barons, i.e. Fronberg being their surname? Or is it the Kunsbergs of Fronberg (i.e. a place)? —  Godsy ^{( TALK} _CONT) 17:59, 10 December 2018 (UTC) reply
      • Oh yeah, missed that point. Then in that case, yes, it falls under both Rcats. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 18:00, 10 December 2018 (UTC) reply
        • I would disagree with using {{ R from surname}} in this instance. While Fronberg can be used as a surname, it is not being used as one here (ie: "Fronberg" isn't a surname for the castle, castles don't have surnames). From the German article, "Fronberg" is a place, de:Fronberg (Schwandorf). -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 18:32, 10 December 2018 (UTC) reply
          • Ah, so it is a place then. —  Godsy ^{( TALK} _CONT) 18:41, 10 December 2018 (UTC) reply
• Keep As stated, Fronberg is not a castle. Schloss Kronberg already has its own page. It does not need to take another page for its own use. Fronberg as a Swedish surname meaning "From The Mountains". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.62.237.104 ( talk) 16:12, 11 December 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Please have a look at WP:NNAME. A requirement to have a page on the Fronberg surname is for there to be at least two notable people that share the surname. The meaning of the surname alone is not enough for notability. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 17:29, 11 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to French Algeria#Characterization as genocide. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 18:39, 13 December 2018 (UTC) reply

• Accusations of French genocide against Algerians → Foreign relations of France  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Undiscussed at target page, nor is it discussed (at least explicitly) at Algerian-French relations.  —  Mr. Guye ( talk) ( contribs)  08:06, 4 December 2018 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to French Algeria#Characterization as genocide. I think that's the section that most directly corresponds to this title in terms of breadth. Also, the article formerly at this title was merged to French rule in Algeria, which is the former title of French Algeria before it got moved. 59.149.124.29 ( talk) 11:31, 4 December 2018 (UTC) reply
• Retarget per 59.149.124.29 Galobtter ( pingó mió) 18:03, 13 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.