From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 10

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 10, 2017.

FOXNews

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 February 20#FOXNews

Template:GGAV Media Corporation

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk) 23:01, 19 February 2017 (UTC) reply

This cross-namespace redirect appears to be a remnant of a move of an article that was erroneously created in the template namespace. Somehow, it has existed for seven years; despite this; I can't really see a need for this redirect (given the purpose of templates, there's rarely if ever a need for a redirect from that namespace to the mainspace). It's probably best to delete it. WCQuidditch 22:05, 10 February 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. I'm not sufficiently sure that this was created in the wrong namespace in error to speedy delete this (would be a G6 candidate), rather than as a misapprehension of a new editor. However, the nominator is right that the page is not needed. Thryduulf ( talk) 22:37, 10 February 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

iota Ursae Minoris

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete, unopposed. -- Tavix ( talk) 23:00, 19 February 2017 (UTC) reply

The redirect name is not a star, not a synonym of 11 UMi, and not a likely typo or mis-spelling. It is just confusing place to send anyone that starts typing iota, perhaps wanting iota Ursae Majoris or something entirely unrelated. Lithopsian ( talk) 20:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Interstate 80N (Pennsylvania)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 February 20#Interstate 80N (Pennsylvania)

Wet winter climate

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 February 20#Wet winter climate

Miguzi

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget. Thryduulf ( talk) 10:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned on target page - can not see the connection Peter Rehse ( talk) 11:10, 10 February 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

United States capital

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. There are decent arguments for moving the disambiguation over the redirect and for keeping the redirect, and they happen to be split right down the middle. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 17:10, 27 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Move United States capital (disambiguation) over redirect, perhaps? Nominated via Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_January_25#Georgia_capital, note that there is a hatnote at target, but the disambig isn't linked. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 00:08, 26 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Not sure I agree. Regardless, United States capital (disambiguation) should be linked from a hatnote at Washington, D.C. if it is to exist. Mark Schierbecker ( talk) 00:23, 26 January 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Move over redirect. I don't think there's a primary topic. WP:SMALLDETAILS might be a case for the status quo, but they're homonyms. If I were to aurally hear the phrase "United States capit[a,o]l", I would instantly think of the United States capitol. When referring to the capital city, "Capital of the United States" would be the most common phrase. -- Tavix ( talk) 18:14, 26 January 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep readers are looking for Washington DC, but yes, a hatnote could be added if they want variants. AngusWOOF ( barksniff) 20:56, 26 January 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Move over redirect. A reader searching for this phrase probably wants a quick answer to the question "Where is the capital of the United States?". The disambiguation page answers the reader more directly than the article. Alternatively they might have thought "Capitol" was spelled "Capital", which is also served succinctly by the disambig page. Deryck C. 17:07, 6 February 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep DC is the United States capital. The hatnote is sufficient to deal with confusion. -- BDD ( talk) 20:21, 7 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Uanfala (talk) 00:37, 10 February 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:PREEMPTSALT

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 February 21#Wikipedia:PREEMPTSALT

Love trumps hate

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Protests against Donald Trump. -- Tavix ( talk) 22:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Both should point to the same target. I don't know which one is better or if either is appropriate. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 03:34, 30 January 2017 (UTC) reply

  • They shouldn't point to Hillary Clinton, this was not her campaign slogan. It therefore would make sense to target both at the article on the many protests that have used this slogan. Beeblebrox ( talk) 05:00, 30 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Actually it was tweeted by Hillary in December 2015 and misquoted soon afterwards [1] but is related to the whole Muslim ban topic, so it could possibly go to Immigration policy of Donald Trump per WP:RECENTISM and most likely slogan association. Whichever page it lands on should have an explanation of the tweet. AngusWOOF ( barksniff) 16:03, 30 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Uanfala (talk) 00:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 10

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 10, 2017.

FOXNews

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 February 20#FOXNews

Template:GGAV Media Corporation

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk) 23:01, 19 February 2017 (UTC) reply

This cross-namespace redirect appears to be a remnant of a move of an article that was erroneously created in the template namespace. Somehow, it has existed for seven years; despite this; I can't really see a need for this redirect (given the purpose of templates, there's rarely if ever a need for a redirect from that namespace to the mainspace). It's probably best to delete it. WCQuidditch 22:05, 10 February 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. I'm not sufficiently sure that this was created in the wrong namespace in error to speedy delete this (would be a G6 candidate), rather than as a misapprehension of a new editor. However, the nominator is right that the page is not needed. Thryduulf ( talk) 22:37, 10 February 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

iota Ursae Minoris

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete, unopposed. -- Tavix ( talk) 23:00, 19 February 2017 (UTC) reply

The redirect name is not a star, not a synonym of 11 UMi, and not a likely typo or mis-spelling. It is just confusing place to send anyone that starts typing iota, perhaps wanting iota Ursae Majoris or something entirely unrelated. Lithopsian ( talk) 20:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Interstate 80N (Pennsylvania)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 February 20#Interstate 80N (Pennsylvania)

Wet winter climate

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 February 20#Wet winter climate

Miguzi

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget. Thryduulf ( talk) 10:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned on target page - can not see the connection Peter Rehse ( talk) 11:10, 10 February 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

United States capital

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. There are decent arguments for moving the disambiguation over the redirect and for keeping the redirect, and they happen to be split right down the middle. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 17:10, 27 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Move United States capital (disambiguation) over redirect, perhaps? Nominated via Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_January_25#Georgia_capital, note that there is a hatnote at target, but the disambig isn't linked. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 00:08, 26 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Not sure I agree. Regardless, United States capital (disambiguation) should be linked from a hatnote at Washington, D.C. if it is to exist. Mark Schierbecker ( talk) 00:23, 26 January 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Move over redirect. I don't think there's a primary topic. WP:SMALLDETAILS might be a case for the status quo, but they're homonyms. If I were to aurally hear the phrase "United States capit[a,o]l", I would instantly think of the United States capitol. When referring to the capital city, "Capital of the United States" would be the most common phrase. -- Tavix ( talk) 18:14, 26 January 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep readers are looking for Washington DC, but yes, a hatnote could be added if they want variants. AngusWOOF ( barksniff) 20:56, 26 January 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Move over redirect. A reader searching for this phrase probably wants a quick answer to the question "Where is the capital of the United States?". The disambiguation page answers the reader more directly than the article. Alternatively they might have thought "Capitol" was spelled "Capital", which is also served succinctly by the disambig page. Deryck C. 17:07, 6 February 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep DC is the United States capital. The hatnote is sufficient to deal with confusion. -- BDD ( talk) 20:21, 7 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Uanfala (talk) 00:37, 10 February 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:PREEMPTSALT

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 February 21#Wikipedia:PREEMPTSALT

Love trumps hate

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Protests against Donald Trump. -- Tavix ( talk) 22:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Both should point to the same target. I don't know which one is better or if either is appropriate. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 03:34, 30 January 2017 (UTC) reply

  • They shouldn't point to Hillary Clinton, this was not her campaign slogan. It therefore would make sense to target both at the article on the many protests that have used this slogan. Beeblebrox ( talk) 05:00, 30 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Actually it was tweeted by Hillary in December 2015 and misquoted soon afterwards [1] but is related to the whole Muslim ban topic, so it could possibly go to Immigration policy of Donald Trump per WP:RECENTISM and most likely slogan association. Whichever page it lands on should have an explanation of the tweet. AngusWOOF ( barksniff) 16:03, 30 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Uanfala (talk) 00:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook