From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 4, 2017.

Spike(rugrats)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk) 22:42, 14 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The version with a space, Spike (Rugrats), exists. Steel1943 ( talk) 18:42, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Duke of Kent

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget as proposed. -- Tavix ( talk) 23:37, 14 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Retarget to Duke of Kent and Duchess of Kent (disambiguation). -- Nevé selbert 17:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Note While I agree with the proposed retarget, I got a message from Neve on my talk page asking to participate, and I argues a similar conclusion on a similar RfD a couple weeks ago. I have some concern about canvassing on this discussion. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 20:36, 5 August 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Retarget all "The Title of Location" to "Title of Location". It make so much more sense and I'm not even sure why we are discussing this. I'm not going to vote on all the idividual noms, but count me as voting for that formula every time. Legacypac ( talk) 15:21, 6 August 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Duke of Gloucester

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Duke of Gloucester. Uncontested. (non-admin closure) f e minist 09:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Retarget both to Duke of Gloucester. -- Nevé selbert 17:55, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Princess Royal

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Princess Royal. Uncontested. (non-admin closure) f e minist 09:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Retarget to Princess Royal. -- Nevé selbert 17:52, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Earl of Wessex

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Earl of Wessex. Uncontested. (non-admin closure) f e minist 09:32, 12 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Retarget to Earl of Wessex. -- Nevé selbert 17:51, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Duke of York

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Duke of York. Uncontested. (non-admin closure) f e minist 09:32, 12 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Retarget to Duke of York. -- Nevé selbert 17:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Duke of Cambridge

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget as proposed. -- Tavix ( talk) 23:32, 14 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Retarget to Duke of Cambridge and Duchess of Cambridge. -- Nevé selbert 17:48, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Duchess of Cornwall

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget/delete as proposed. -- Tavix ( talk) 22:52, 14 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Retarget to Duchess of Cornwall and Duchess of Rothesay. See similar discussions here and here. -- Nevé selbert 17:42, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Madelaine Petsch

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. -- Tavix ( talk) 22:42, 14 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Redirects for an actor should not redirect to a single piece of their work, they are known for acting in different media (at this point, SIX). -- Alex TW 02:07, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nintendo Co. Ltd. - 任天堂株式会社

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was deleted without opposition. bd2412 T 03:29, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Delete, implausible mixed-script redirect. -- Tavix ( talk) 00:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rentiantang

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was deleted without opposition. bd2412 T 03:30, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Delete per WP:RFOREIGN as Chinese romanization. -- Tavix ( talk) 00:53, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nintendo underwear

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 10:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

This was a silly little stub from 2006, should have been deleted then. -- Tavix ( talk) 00:52, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Latamel

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 15:41, 17 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Per pt:Latamel, this is a Nintendo distribution company in Latin America, but we don't seem to cover it on the English language Wikipedia. -- Tavix ( talk) 00:51, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hinduism in the Pitcairn Islands

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 10:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Well, I gotta start somewhere with these, so I guess I'll take the most obvious one. Hinduism in the Pitcairn Islands does not exist. According to Pitcairn Islands#Religion, the entire population is Seventh-Day Adventist. The only redirect of this form that would make sense is Seventh-Day Adventism in the Pitcairn Islands, but that doesn't even exist.-- Tavix ( talk) 00:45, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, completely useless and misleading to have redirects about religions not present in a country. — Kusma ( t· c) 09:11, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. This really isn't different from the majority of the redirects discussed in the previous discussion and if that discussion were to played out again, this should be closed as no consensus. Still, I continue to find the keep argument rather baffling, so I continue to be convinced that this should be deleted. – Uanfala 09:37, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. I think the potential for confusion outweighs any benefit this may have. -- Notecardforfree ( talk) 19:54, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete the only hindu ever on Pitcairn would have been a very rare passing tourist. The only church building ever is the Seventh-day Adventist one and since the 1890s Adventism has been the only faith practiced by the residents. Legacypac ( talk) 23:56, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 4, 2017.

Spike(rugrats)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk) 22:42, 14 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The version with a space, Spike (Rugrats), exists. Steel1943 ( talk) 18:42, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Duke of Kent

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget as proposed. -- Tavix ( talk) 23:37, 14 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Retarget to Duke of Kent and Duchess of Kent (disambiguation). -- Nevé selbert 17:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Note While I agree with the proposed retarget, I got a message from Neve on my talk page asking to participate, and I argues a similar conclusion on a similar RfD a couple weeks ago. I have some concern about canvassing on this discussion. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 20:36, 5 August 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Retarget all "The Title of Location" to "Title of Location". It make so much more sense and I'm not even sure why we are discussing this. I'm not going to vote on all the idividual noms, but count me as voting for that formula every time. Legacypac ( talk) 15:21, 6 August 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Duke of Gloucester

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Duke of Gloucester. Uncontested. (non-admin closure) f e minist 09:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Retarget both to Duke of Gloucester. -- Nevé selbert 17:55, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Princess Royal

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Princess Royal. Uncontested. (non-admin closure) f e minist 09:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Retarget to Princess Royal. -- Nevé selbert 17:52, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Earl of Wessex

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Earl of Wessex. Uncontested. (non-admin closure) f e minist 09:32, 12 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Retarget to Earl of Wessex. -- Nevé selbert 17:51, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Duke of York

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Duke of York. Uncontested. (non-admin closure) f e minist 09:32, 12 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Retarget to Duke of York. -- Nevé selbert 17:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Duke of Cambridge

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget as proposed. -- Tavix ( talk) 23:32, 14 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Retarget to Duke of Cambridge and Duchess of Cambridge. -- Nevé selbert 17:48, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Duchess of Cornwall

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget/delete as proposed. -- Tavix ( talk) 22:52, 14 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Retarget to Duchess of Cornwall and Duchess of Rothesay. See similar discussions here and here. -- Nevé selbert 17:42, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Madelaine Petsch

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. -- Tavix ( talk) 22:42, 14 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Redirects for an actor should not redirect to a single piece of their work, they are known for acting in different media (at this point, SIX). -- Alex TW 02:07, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nintendo Co. Ltd. - 任天堂株式会社

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was deleted without opposition. bd2412 T 03:29, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Delete, implausible mixed-script redirect. -- Tavix ( talk) 00:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rentiantang

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was deleted without opposition. bd2412 T 03:30, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Delete per WP:RFOREIGN as Chinese romanization. -- Tavix ( talk) 00:53, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nintendo underwear

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 10:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

This was a silly little stub from 2006, should have been deleted then. -- Tavix ( talk) 00:52, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Latamel

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 15:41, 17 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Per pt:Latamel, this is a Nintendo distribution company in Latin America, but we don't seem to cover it on the English language Wikipedia. -- Tavix ( talk) 00:51, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hinduism in the Pitcairn Islands

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 10:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Well, I gotta start somewhere with these, so I guess I'll take the most obvious one. Hinduism in the Pitcairn Islands does not exist. According to Pitcairn Islands#Religion, the entire population is Seventh-Day Adventist. The only redirect of this form that would make sense is Seventh-Day Adventism in the Pitcairn Islands, but that doesn't even exist.-- Tavix ( talk) 00:45, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, completely useless and misleading to have redirects about religions not present in a country. — Kusma ( t· c) 09:11, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. This really isn't different from the majority of the redirects discussed in the previous discussion and if that discussion were to played out again, this should be closed as no consensus. Still, I continue to find the keep argument rather baffling, so I continue to be convinced that this should be deleted. – Uanfala 09:37, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. I think the potential for confusion outweighs any benefit this may have. -- Notecardforfree ( talk) 19:54, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete the only hindu ever on Pitcairn would have been a very rare passing tourist. The only church building ever is the Seventh-day Adventist one and since the 1890s Adventism has been the only faith practiced by the residents. Legacypac ( talk) 23:56, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook