This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 19, 2014.
Könugård
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk) 18:29, 4 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment As Kiev was a
Varyag holding, and the capital of
its empire, what was the Nordic name of the place, since the Varyag were Viking. --
65.94.171.126 (
talk) 05:46, 20 July 2014 (UTC)reply
Kiev was not Varangian holding. Ruling dynasty of
Kievan Rus' was of Varangian ancesty, although apparently even they used Slavic language, and no mention of Norse languages appear in chronicles. Anyway, Varangians definitely did not spell the name of Kiev like this, because at that time they used
runic alphabet. —
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (
talk•
track) 09:41, 20 July 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk) 15:45, 4 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Not sure what it means, if anytrhing, certainly not notable.
TheChampionMan1234 07:13, 19 July 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep: redirects don't require notability, they need only not be misleading or meaningless, and deleting them actually uses up more bandwidth than keeping them see
WP:CHEAP.
AioftheStorm (
talk) 18:56, 19 July 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:R#DELETE criterion 8: obscure neologism with no established meaning. In search results I mostly see the meaning "associated with Korea in some way", which should not be covered on Wikipedia per
WP:NOTDICT. In a mean time, this redirect facilitates accidential wikilinking of unencyclopedic term. —
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (
talk•
track) 22:27, 19 July 2014 (UTC)reply
delete per Czarkoff's argument. I found essentially the same thing, with the only consistent meaning occurring in the phrase "anti-koreanism", which this redirect can't deal with.
Mangoe (
talk) 01:26, 20 July 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Traditional colors of Korea
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
Dancheong. --
BDD (
talk) 15:09, 5 August 2014 (UTC)reply
redirect to
Dancheong where the traditional colors are mentioned in the lead.
Mangoe (
talk) 00:58, 20 July 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
East Korea
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk) 15:41, 4 August 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Trung Quốc
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk) 15:40, 4 August 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 19, 2014.
Könugård
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk) 18:29, 4 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment As Kiev was a
Varyag holding, and the capital of
its empire, what was the Nordic name of the place, since the Varyag were Viking. --
65.94.171.126 (
talk) 05:46, 20 July 2014 (UTC)reply
Kiev was not Varangian holding. Ruling dynasty of
Kievan Rus' was of Varangian ancesty, although apparently even they used Slavic language, and no mention of Norse languages appear in chronicles. Anyway, Varangians definitely did not spell the name of Kiev like this, because at that time they used
runic alphabet. —
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (
talk•
track) 09:41, 20 July 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk) 15:45, 4 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Not sure what it means, if anytrhing, certainly not notable.
TheChampionMan1234 07:13, 19 July 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep: redirects don't require notability, they need only not be misleading or meaningless, and deleting them actually uses up more bandwidth than keeping them see
WP:CHEAP.
AioftheStorm (
talk) 18:56, 19 July 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:R#DELETE criterion 8: obscure neologism with no established meaning. In search results I mostly see the meaning "associated with Korea in some way", which should not be covered on Wikipedia per
WP:NOTDICT. In a mean time, this redirect facilitates accidential wikilinking of unencyclopedic term. —
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (
talk•
track) 22:27, 19 July 2014 (UTC)reply
delete per Czarkoff's argument. I found essentially the same thing, with the only consistent meaning occurring in the phrase "anti-koreanism", which this redirect can't deal with.
Mangoe (
talk) 01:26, 20 July 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Traditional colors of Korea
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
Dancheong. --
BDD (
talk) 15:09, 5 August 2014 (UTC)reply
redirect to
Dancheong where the traditional colors are mentioned in the lead.
Mangoe (
talk) 00:58, 20 July 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
East Korea
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk) 15:41, 4 August 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Trung Quốc
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk) 15:40, 4 August 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.