This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 2, 2013
HEYYEYAAEYAAAEYAEYAA
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep: The redirect is due to the title of the YouTube video, mentioned in the
In popular culture section of the article. However, the redirect may be better placed leading directly to that section. --
SnorlaxMonster10:29, 3 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep and refine target to the "In popular culture" section per Snorlax Monster where the viral video by this name is discussed. The redirect was viewed over 100 times in April and over 200 in March so it is extremely far from useless.
Thryduulf (
talk)
18:22, 3 May 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
G:o Washington
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep per Nyttend. The stats show that it is used 6-8 times most months, which is greater than background noise (3-4 hits/month) meaning that deletion would inconvenience people while bringing no benefit.
Thryduulf (
talk)
18:26, 3 May 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
3.1415
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
All of these are incorrect approximations of Pi, and should be 3.1416, 3.141593, and 3.1415927, respectively. These redirects should all be deleted due to being inaccurate.
SnorlaxMonster11:22, 2 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep all 3.141592653589793, if you truncate this, you will get each of the above redirects. And they are usable, if you copy and paste the number into search box, but don't select the full length term. Indeed if someone programmed a program to display a truncated length string instead of rounding the term, then these will appear as the outputs. Further, if they take 1/2 and round down instead of up, then the last two are acceptable anyways. Mark them as {{R from typo}} --
65.94.76.126 (
talk)
05:21, 3 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Whether you round 1/2 up or down isn't going to affect it. Pi is an unending decimal, so all instances of the digit 5 must be rounded up due to being greater than 5 (although only one of the two you mentioned uses the digit 5 anyway). --
SnorlaxMonster10:29, 3 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep all. Wikipedia is not only for those who know maths - truncation is just as (if not more) logical for the lay person than rounding. The stats show that these are all used, the first particularly, so their deletion would inconvenience people for no benefit. Tagging as a {{R from misspelling}} seems a good idea.
Thryduulf (
talk)
18:31, 3 May 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 2, 2013
HEYYEYAAEYAAAEYAEYAA
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep: The redirect is due to the title of the YouTube video, mentioned in the
In popular culture section of the article. However, the redirect may be better placed leading directly to that section. --
SnorlaxMonster10:29, 3 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep and refine target to the "In popular culture" section per Snorlax Monster where the viral video by this name is discussed. The redirect was viewed over 100 times in April and over 200 in March so it is extremely far from useless.
Thryduulf (
talk)
18:22, 3 May 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
G:o Washington
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep per Nyttend. The stats show that it is used 6-8 times most months, which is greater than background noise (3-4 hits/month) meaning that deletion would inconvenience people while bringing no benefit.
Thryduulf (
talk)
18:26, 3 May 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
3.1415
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
All of these are incorrect approximations of Pi, and should be 3.1416, 3.141593, and 3.1415927, respectively. These redirects should all be deleted due to being inaccurate.
SnorlaxMonster11:22, 2 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep all 3.141592653589793, if you truncate this, you will get each of the above redirects. And they are usable, if you copy and paste the number into search box, but don't select the full length term. Indeed if someone programmed a program to display a truncated length string instead of rounding the term, then these will appear as the outputs. Further, if they take 1/2 and round down instead of up, then the last two are acceptable anyways. Mark them as {{R from typo}} --
65.94.76.126 (
talk)
05:21, 3 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Whether you round 1/2 up or down isn't going to affect it. Pi is an unending decimal, so all instances of the digit 5 must be rounded up due to being greater than 5 (although only one of the two you mentioned uses the digit 5 anyway). --
SnorlaxMonster10:29, 3 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep all. Wikipedia is not only for those who know maths - truncation is just as (if not more) logical for the lay person than rounding. The stats show that these are all used, the first particularly, so their deletion would inconvenience people for no benefit. Tagging as a {{R from misspelling}} seems a good idea.
Thryduulf (
talk)
18:31, 3 May 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.