This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 12, 2013
Schwarzrheindorf/Vilich-Rheindorf
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Ukrainian People's Hromada
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
2030 FIFA World Cup
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
No information about this WC yet. There will presumably in due time be multiple bids to host the event, but there is an implicit favourtism in directing readers to just one
Kevin McE (
talk)
11:48, 12 May 2013 (UTC)reply
No other potential bids yet. If another bids will appear in future then we will have the new main article instead this redirect.
NickSt (
talk)
13:26, 12 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Retarget to a new section at
FIFA World Cup hosts. We have an article with verifiable content about the 2030 world cup so it should get a mention on the main page for future championships, but at this stage it doesn't really need to be more than a sentence or two to say that this bid is the only one that presently exists (AFAIK anyway) and a link to the article. The present target I agree is wrong.
Thryduulf (
talk)
08:25, 13 May 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Shawn Powell
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
There are other Shawn Powell's, including a well-known Newsday columnist, and it is unreasonable BLP emphasis that this not unusual name links to the relatively unimportant criminal in this unsavory scheme . DGG (
talk )
05:23, 12 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Write an article or disambiguate. If there is only one Shawn Powell we have information on then it is right that the name redirects to that information. If there are other notable people by this name then write articles about them and dab the name and/or dab the name to the other articles where they are mentioned.
Thryduulf (
talk)
08:29, 13 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Disambiguate/start an article -- For the record, the columnist is Shaun (which has not been created), but there is another Shawn: a recently professional football player who probably passes notability guidelines on his college career alone. Either way, this redirect does not need to, as DGG says, point directly to the one minor criminal.
NoleloverTalk·Contribs13:14, 13 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Shaun and Shawn should be linked by redirects or hatnotes (depending on creation status) as they are very likely misspellings of each other as DGG demonstrates above.
Thryduulf (
talk)
14:08, 13 May 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 12, 2013
Schwarzrheindorf/Vilich-Rheindorf
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Ukrainian People's Hromada
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
2030 FIFA World Cup
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
No information about this WC yet. There will presumably in due time be multiple bids to host the event, but there is an implicit favourtism in directing readers to just one
Kevin McE (
talk)
11:48, 12 May 2013 (UTC)reply
No other potential bids yet. If another bids will appear in future then we will have the new main article instead this redirect.
NickSt (
talk)
13:26, 12 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Retarget to a new section at
FIFA World Cup hosts. We have an article with verifiable content about the 2030 world cup so it should get a mention on the main page for future championships, but at this stage it doesn't really need to be more than a sentence or two to say that this bid is the only one that presently exists (AFAIK anyway) and a link to the article. The present target I agree is wrong.
Thryduulf (
talk)
08:25, 13 May 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Shawn Powell
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
There are other Shawn Powell's, including a well-known Newsday columnist, and it is unreasonable BLP emphasis that this not unusual name links to the relatively unimportant criminal in this unsavory scheme . DGG (
talk )
05:23, 12 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Write an article or disambiguate. If there is only one Shawn Powell we have information on then it is right that the name redirects to that information. If there are other notable people by this name then write articles about them and dab the name and/or dab the name to the other articles where they are mentioned.
Thryduulf (
talk)
08:29, 13 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Disambiguate/start an article -- For the record, the columnist is Shaun (which has not been created), but there is another Shawn: a recently professional football player who probably passes notability guidelines on his college career alone. Either way, this redirect does not need to, as DGG says, point directly to the one minor criminal.
NoleloverTalk·Contribs13:14, 13 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Shaun and Shawn should be linked by redirects or hatnotes (depending on creation status) as they are very likely misspellings of each other as DGG demonstrates above.
Thryduulf (
talk)
14:08, 13 May 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.