This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 29, 2011
Delete as simply confusing: I can't see any reference to this at the target or the perhaps more relevant Elvish languages (Middle-earth). JohnBlackburne words deeds 14:51, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Misleading redirect. I'm not aware of any reliable sources which describe Hindutva as 'neoconservatism'; they seem to be entirely separate ideologies. Hindutva is considerably different from what neoconservatism means in the West, so this redirect is more likely to be confusing than helpful. Robofish ( talk) 13:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
deletion - reasons : no known connection with the target, probably a bot-mishap ( user:Xqbot), maybe the redirect could even be seen as offensive?. The previous (original) target Merkin had the relevant part for the redirect removed from the target article (for being unsourced) on December 12 2007, so just reverting the redirect seems not a good solution to me. In case I did all this here totally wrong, then please tell me so. Thanks. Pardon my German (Fiiiisch!) ( talk) 17:42, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Please delete. This seems to be an unnecessary redirect to accommodate an unlikely typo ("Dabnube" does not redirect to "Danube"). It was used only once, on Yugoslav Front, and it isn't anymore. – Miranche T C 23:25, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 29, 2011
Delete as simply confusing: I can't see any reference to this at the target or the perhaps more relevant Elvish languages (Middle-earth). JohnBlackburne words deeds 14:51, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Misleading redirect. I'm not aware of any reliable sources which describe Hindutva as 'neoconservatism'; they seem to be entirely separate ideologies. Hindutva is considerably different from what neoconservatism means in the West, so this redirect is more likely to be confusing than helpful. Robofish ( talk) 13:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
deletion - reasons : no known connection with the target, probably a bot-mishap ( user:Xqbot), maybe the redirect could even be seen as offensive?. The previous (original) target Merkin had the relevant part for the redirect removed from the target article (for being unsourced) on December 12 2007, so just reverting the redirect seems not a good solution to me. In case I did all this here totally wrong, then please tell me so. Thanks. Pardon my German (Fiiiisch!) ( talk) 17:42, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Please delete. This seems to be an unnecessary redirect to accommodate an unlikely typo ("Dabnube" does not redirect to "Danube"). It was used only once, on Yugoslav Front, and it isn't anymore. – Miranche T C 23:25, 29 December 2011 (UTC)