Also nominating Traditional marriage which currently also redirects to Marriage. These are protected redirects, thanks to the repeated creation of the deleted Traditional Marriage ( AfD) article. That article was a content fork of Marriage. The issue for discussion is not so much deletion as whether the target of Marriage is more or less appropriate than the target of Traditional marriage movement or possibly Same-sex marriage (specifically, one of the sections talking about controversy or opposition). Due to some discussion on the two redirect talk pages, I fell it's best to bring this to a forum where the community at large can comment instead of having a fractured debate. Based on a quick google search, the term "traditional marriage" has definite connotations against same-sex marriage. I still favor Marriage as a target, because the "movement" doesn't really exist as any kind of organized thing, it's rather a media term that is used occasionally to refer to groups opposed to same-sex marriage. Mango juice talk 21:39, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Does not appear in the target article except while the unsourced section is present, contrary to WP:RS and the invisble text in the target article. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 20:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Redirect is not only offensive but also implies it is a part of the "Wikipedia:" namespace. Delete. — coelacan talk — 06:36, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
This redirect used to be useful in that Gough's Cave is covered in the Cheddar Gorge and Caves article however there is now a article specifically on this cave at Gough’s Cave— Rod talk 13:53, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
The redirect was created fresh, but there's nothing in the target article to explain it — no mention of the term at all. It seems to be some sort of attack on the target (to which the redirect creator hasn't contributed). Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης) 17:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Also nominating Traditional marriage which currently also redirects to Marriage. These are protected redirects, thanks to the repeated creation of the deleted Traditional Marriage ( AfD) article. That article was a content fork of Marriage. The issue for discussion is not so much deletion as whether the target of Marriage is more or less appropriate than the target of Traditional marriage movement or possibly Same-sex marriage (specifically, one of the sections talking about controversy or opposition). Due to some discussion on the two redirect talk pages, I fell it's best to bring this to a forum where the community at large can comment instead of having a fractured debate. Based on a quick google search, the term "traditional marriage" has definite connotations against same-sex marriage. I still favor Marriage as a target, because the "movement" doesn't really exist as any kind of organized thing, it's rather a media term that is used occasionally to refer to groups opposed to same-sex marriage. Mango juice talk 21:39, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Does not appear in the target article except while the unsourced section is present, contrary to WP:RS and the invisble text in the target article. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 20:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Redirect is not only offensive but also implies it is a part of the "Wikipedia:" namespace. Delete. — coelacan talk — 06:36, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
This redirect used to be useful in that Gough's Cave is covered in the Cheddar Gorge and Caves article however there is now a article specifically on this cave at Gough’s Cave— Rod talk 13:53, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
The redirect was created fresh, but there's nothing in the target article to explain it — no mention of the term at all. It seems to be some sort of attack on the target (to which the redirect creator hasn't contributed). Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης) 17:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)