- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:12, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- Photo of a sculpture by another artist (FoP?) Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:02, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. FOP in Germany makes pictures of sculptures fine. The only issue here is permission to use this photo. The uploader has given some information, but not quite enough. Will get in contact with them shortly. — ξ xplicit 02:07, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Don't really know what else I can do to prove I have permission to use this. I did get written permission from the eBay seller to use it. Once this item is sold on eBay, the picture will be of no value to them (Deconamic) whatsoever. I am trying very carefully to be prudent about what I upload. I argue that this upload is completely above board and see no issues with copyright status. I realize there is a form people can fill out to release rights, but to non-Wikipedians it is almost impossible to understand. I went through this before when a photo I added to my
Bad Rock Canyon article was deleted when I had written approval to use that one, too. I sent the form to the owner of the photo but they had no clue how to fill it out. --
EditorExtraordinaire (
talk)
04:46, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- The problem is that the eBay seller, who is the copyright holder in the photo, did not explicitly agree to the license you have stated. Their permission was so broadly worded that it does not guarantee the four freedoms of a free cultural work which we require on Wikipedia. The image must be deleted unless you can get explicit permission to use the image under that particular license from the copyright holder. BethNaught ( talk) 21:31, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- Don't really know what else I can do to prove I have permission to use this. I did get written permission from the eBay seller to use it. Once this item is sold on eBay, the picture will be of no value to them (Deconamic) whatsoever. I am trying very carefully to be prudent about what I upload. I argue that this upload is completely above board and see no issues with copyright status. I realize there is a form people can fill out to release rights, but to non-Wikipedians it is almost impossible to understand. I went through this before when a photo I added to my
Bad Rock Canyon article was deleted when I had written approval to use that one, too. I sent the form to the owner of the photo but they had no clue how to fill it out. --
EditorExtraordinaire (
talk)
04:46, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete The uploader requested a Wikipedia-only permission from the eBay seller. The eBay seller didn't specify which permission he granted, so we have to assume that he granted the requested permission. This means that the file fails {{ db-f3}}. There is also no OTRS ticket. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 21:36, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Blueprint for proposed new academic block, West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- File:Blueprint for proposed new academic block, West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence that the uploader is artist/architect. Kelly hi! 13:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:Ruptured Duck (Hawaii).jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
.jpg&action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3APossibly+unfree+files%2F2015+September+7%23File%3ARuptured+Duck+%28Hawaii%29.jpg%5D%5D){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
- Unable to verify source/license. Kelly hi! 14:17, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- File:Briana Scott.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Promotional photo(s). No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 16:01, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:12, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Nelsonmonument01.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative work - no freedom of panorama for 2D works in the UK. Kelly hi! 16:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. The UK has FOP for 2D works of artistic craftsmanship, but not for 2D graphic works. I'm not entirely sure if this falls under the latter. — ξ xplicit 02:07, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete The UK only has FOP for works of art but this is a work of literature. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 21:28, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- File:Manuyunkbridge85septa.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The uploader claims that it is from his "personal collection" and not subject to copyright. This image can be found in Williams, Gerry (1999). Trains, Trolleys & Transit: A Guide to Philadelphia Area Rail Transit. Railpace Newsmagazine. and is credited to the author, Gerry Williams. Unless Oanabay04 ( talk · contribs) is Gerry Williams, and there is no evidence for this, the file is unfree. Note that said user was indeffed for sockpuppetry and is now the subject of a major copyright investigation. Mackensen (talk) 18:01, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- This is another one of those incidents that really pisses me off. Another really nice image that turns out to be a copyvio, except that it's nicer than most of the ones that have been used. An Authentic Reading Railroad EMU still being used by SEPTS on a PRR line in the 1980's. I really wish that image had a link, so I could reuse it again as a substitute. --------- User:DanTD ( talk) 16:55, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- File:Ptebview1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Web resolution, no evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 18:39, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- File:Patas monkey baby close.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Claimed as {{ PD-self}} but also has a link as a source. Kelly hi! 18:41, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- File:Principal abul kashem 3.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 20:27, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- File:Smas1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Web resolution, no metadata, no evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 21:12, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:Reeves Mothballs (4).jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
.jpg&action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3APossibly+unfree+files%2F2015+September+7%23File%3AReeves+Mothballs+%284%29.jpg%5D%5D){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
- Unable to verify source or license. Kelly hi! 21:39, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:12, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Frenchlace3.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Claimed as {{ PD-self}} but also has dead Flickr link. Kelly hi! 22:33, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. Link is indeed dead, but Flickr user has a similar photo on her stream under the same Creative Commons license. Should we assume good faith here? Or just replace this photo with the other one? — ξ xplicit 02:07, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- I replaced the one usage of this file with a similar white rose from the Commons. -- Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 20:00, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- File:Front nfl closeup.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unclear if uploader is copyright holder. Original upload contained the name of an author (W. Mainieri) and the statement "fair use" that was removed by another editor. Kelly hi! 23:01, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:12, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- Photo of a sculpture by another artist (FoP?) Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:02, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. FOP in Germany makes pictures of sculptures fine. The only issue here is permission to use this photo. The uploader has given some information, but not quite enough. Will get in contact with them shortly. — ξ xplicit 02:07, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Don't really know what else I can do to prove I have permission to use this. I did get written permission from the eBay seller to use it. Once this item is sold on eBay, the picture will be of no value to them (Deconamic) whatsoever. I am trying very carefully to be prudent about what I upload. I argue that this upload is completely above board and see no issues with copyright status. I realize there is a form people can fill out to release rights, but to non-Wikipedians it is almost impossible to understand. I went through this before when a photo I added to my
Bad Rock Canyon article was deleted when I had written approval to use that one, too. I sent the form to the owner of the photo but they had no clue how to fill it out. --
EditorExtraordinaire (
talk)
04:46, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- The problem is that the eBay seller, who is the copyright holder in the photo, did not explicitly agree to the license you have stated. Their permission was so broadly worded that it does not guarantee the four freedoms of a free cultural work which we require on Wikipedia. The image must be deleted unless you can get explicit permission to use the image under that particular license from the copyright holder. BethNaught ( talk) 21:31, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- Don't really know what else I can do to prove I have permission to use this. I did get written permission from the eBay seller to use it. Once this item is sold on eBay, the picture will be of no value to them (Deconamic) whatsoever. I am trying very carefully to be prudent about what I upload. I argue that this upload is completely above board and see no issues with copyright status. I realize there is a form people can fill out to release rights, but to non-Wikipedians it is almost impossible to understand. I went through this before when a photo I added to my
Bad Rock Canyon article was deleted when I had written approval to use that one, too. I sent the form to the owner of the photo but they had no clue how to fill it out. --
EditorExtraordinaire (
talk)
04:46, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete The uploader requested a Wikipedia-only permission from the eBay seller. The eBay seller didn't specify which permission he granted, so we have to assume that he granted the requested permission. This means that the file fails {{ db-f3}}. There is also no OTRS ticket. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 21:36, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Blueprint for proposed new academic block, West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- File:Blueprint for proposed new academic block, West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence that the uploader is artist/architect. Kelly hi! 13:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- File:Ruptured Duck (Hawaii).jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unable to verify source/license. Kelly hi! 14:17, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- File:Briana Scott.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Promotional photo(s). No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 16:01, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:12, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Nelsonmonument01.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative work - no freedom of panorama for 2D works in the UK. Kelly hi! 16:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. The UK has FOP for 2D works of artistic craftsmanship, but not for 2D graphic works. I'm not entirely sure if this falls under the latter. — ξ xplicit 02:07, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete The UK only has FOP for works of art but this is a work of literature. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 21:28, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- File:Manuyunkbridge85septa.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The uploader claims that it is from his "personal collection" and not subject to copyright. This image can be found in Williams, Gerry (1999). Trains, Trolleys & Transit: A Guide to Philadelphia Area Rail Transit. Railpace Newsmagazine. and is credited to the author, Gerry Williams. Unless Oanabay04 ( talk · contribs) is Gerry Williams, and there is no evidence for this, the file is unfree. Note that said user was indeffed for sockpuppetry and is now the subject of a major copyright investigation. Mackensen (talk) 18:01, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- This is another one of those incidents that really pisses me off. Another really nice image that turns out to be a copyvio, except that it's nicer than most of the ones that have been used. An Authentic Reading Railroad EMU still being used by SEPTS on a PRR line in the 1980's. I really wish that image had a link, so I could reuse it again as a substitute. --------- User:DanTD ( talk) 16:55, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- File:Ptebview1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Web resolution, no evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 18:39, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- File:Patas monkey baby close.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Claimed as {{ PD-self}} but also has a link as a source. Kelly hi! 18:41, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- File:Principal abul kashem 3.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 20:27, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- File:Smas1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Web resolution, no metadata, no evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 21:12, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- File:Reeves Mothballs (4).jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unable to verify source or license. Kelly hi! 21:39, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:12, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Frenchlace3.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Claimed as {{ PD-self}} but also has dead Flickr link. Kelly hi! 22:33, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. Link is indeed dead, but Flickr user has a similar photo on her stream under the same Creative Commons license. Should we assume good faith here? Or just replace this photo with the other one? — ξ xplicit 02:07, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- I replaced the one usage of this file with a similar white rose from the Commons. -- Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 20:00, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- File:Front nfl closeup.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unclear if uploader is copyright holder. Original upload contained the name of an author (W. Mainieri) and the statement "fair use" that was removed by another editor. Kelly hi! 23:01, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.