The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Family photo, no known copyrights.
Family photographs are typically unpublished and often anonymous (it is not known by which family member they were taken) and are therefore usually copyrighted unless at least 120 years old. This picture is probably more recent than so and therefore has to be assumed to be unfree.Personal Collection of Trichy Sankaran
and licensed as "GFDL-self". Missing evidence of permission. The fact that the picture appears in Trichy Sankaran's
who? collection does not automatically mean that Trichy Sankaran
who? is the copyright holder.The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Family photo, no known copyrights.
Family photographs are typically unpublished and often anonymous (it is not known by which family member they were taken) and are therefore usually copyrighted unless at least 120 years old. This picture is probably more recent than so and therefore has to be assumed to be unfree.Personal Collection of Trichy Sankaran
and licensed as "GFDL-self". Missing evidence of permission. The fact that the picture appears in Trichy Sankaran's
who? collection does not automatically mean that Trichy Sankaran
who? is the copyright holder.The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)