- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- File:Seattle Public Library4.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is a photograph of a mural located in the US, There is no US FoP for such works as I understood it. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:58, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Doesn't look like a US government work as claimed. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:10, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Doesn't look like a US government work as claimed. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:10, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- File:Tech Details.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Doesn't look like a chemical structure as claimed. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:10, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Uploader claims copyright of an image that has been used on facebook and a website according to provided information, really needs more information on provenance if it has been previously published
MilborneOne (
talk)
19:39, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- Just to add a year ago the same user uploaded identical file File:Robert Livingstone.jpg sourced to gamesbid.com which was deleted as CSD F11 after no evidence of permission was provided. MilborneOne ( talk) 19:45, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- File:Dennis Woodside.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Public Domain claimed but the source website has CC BY 4.0 which relates to the website not the particular image, I doubt the image belongs to www.muktware.com, tineye https://www.tineye.com/search/8743dcd3db5fda3b55bfc6a4ebacf254363d0098/ indicates that it is a publicity image from the days Woodside worked at Google. MilborneOne ( talk) 20:26, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- File:Silvia Busuioc.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader claims own work but http://www.milanotoday.it/eventi/silvia-busuioc-casting-hollywood.html would seem to indicate is a publicity/press release image. MilborneOne ( talk) 20:36, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- File:Seattle Public Library4.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is a photograph of a mural located in the US, There is no US FoP for such works as I understood it. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:58, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Doesn't look like a US government work as claimed. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:10, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Doesn't look like a US government work as claimed. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:10, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- File:Tech Details.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Doesn't look like a chemical structure as claimed. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:10, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Uploader claims copyright of an image that has been used on facebook and a website according to provided information, really needs more information on provenance if it has been previously published
MilborneOne (
talk)
19:39, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- Just to add a year ago the same user uploaded identical file File:Robert Livingstone.jpg sourced to gamesbid.com which was deleted as CSD F11 after no evidence of permission was provided. MilborneOne ( talk) 19:45, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- File:Dennis Woodside.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Public Domain claimed but the source website has CC BY 4.0 which relates to the website not the particular image, I doubt the image belongs to www.muktware.com, tineye https://www.tineye.com/search/8743dcd3db5fda3b55bfc6a4ebacf254363d0098/ indicates that it is a publicity image from the days Woodside worked at Google. MilborneOne ( talk) 20:26, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- File:Silvia Busuioc.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader claims own work but http://www.milanotoday.it/eventi/silvia-busuioc-casting-hollywood.html would seem to indicate is a publicity/press release image. MilborneOne ( talk) 20:36, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.