- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Derivative work of a painting. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Derivative work of a painting. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- File:Autoimmune, specific humidity – mold on canvas, 80-60cm.jpeg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative work of a painting. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- File:Decomposition 8, bloom – mold on compressed wood, 70-70cm.jpeg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative work of a painting. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- In the source field, it says "Cropped from", which suggests that the image is a derivative work of another, unspecified, image. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Added the source of the cropped from image. Sevds ( talk) 18:17, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, no evidence that the source image is freely licensed. January ( talk) 15:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- In the source field, it says "It is taken from a text of an archive form" which means that it is not own work by the uploader at all, but an image of unknown source and copyright status. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:55, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
.jpg){kind=link}
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept: Issues resolved. -- TLSuda ( talk) 00:05, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3APossibly+unfree+files%2F2014+February+11%23File%3AJonathan+Garcia+get%26%2338%3B-39%26%2359%3Bs+ready+for+a+tag%28local%29.jpg%5D%5D){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
- Potential copyright violation on
Template:Did you know/Preparation area 4: the page does not link to a page which contains the name of the photographer or a link to the licence. You have to follow links in two steps, but it is dubious whether {{
cc-by-2.0}} allows more than just one step.
Stefan2 (
talk)
16:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- At the moment, all links work fine with me, and I can verify the cc-by license.
Materialscientist (
talk)
22:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- It is still not possible to find the attribution and licence by only one click from the pages using the image. You still need two clicks, so the copyright problem remains. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 23:39, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- At the moment, all links work fine with me, and I can verify the cc-by license.
Materialscientist (
talk)
22:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- It would be appreciated if Stefan would stop going around disruptively tagging files he knows full well are GFDL compliant, based on his over-strict interpretation of the rules, or what he would like the rules to be. I have already warned him before to keep his zeal in check. He is once again wasting other people's and his own time with this anal retentivenes. -- Ohc ¡digame! 00:32, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- I copied the Commons description/licensing to the local description page, which should resolve any concerns about the attribution. January ( talk) 23:05, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete copy-vio revision. -- TLSuda ( talk) 00:20, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- File:Lateral2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file. The revision by User:Treeoflife23 is a copyright violation. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:33, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Derivative work of a painting. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Derivative work of a painting. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- File:Autoimmune, specific humidity – mold on canvas, 80-60cm.jpeg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative work of a painting. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- File:Decomposition 8, bloom – mold on compressed wood, 70-70cm.jpeg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative work of a painting. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- In the source field, it says "Cropped from", which suggests that the image is a derivative work of another, unspecified, image. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Added the source of the cropped from image. Sevds ( talk) 18:17, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, no evidence that the source image is freely licensed. January ( talk) 15:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- In the source field, it says "It is taken from a text of an archive form" which means that it is not own work by the uploader at all, but an image of unknown source and copyright status. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:55, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept: Issues resolved. -- TLSuda ( talk) 00:05, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Potential copyright violation on
Template:Did you know/Preparation area 4: the page does not link to a page which contains the name of the photographer or a link to the licence. You have to follow links in two steps, but it is dubious whether {{
cc-by-2.0}} allows more than just one step.
Stefan2 (
talk)
16:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- At the moment, all links work fine with me, and I can verify the cc-by license.
Materialscientist (
talk)
22:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- It is still not possible to find the attribution and licence by only one click from the pages using the image. You still need two clicks, so the copyright problem remains. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 23:39, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- At the moment, all links work fine with me, and I can verify the cc-by license.
Materialscientist (
talk)
22:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- It would be appreciated if Stefan would stop going around disruptively tagging files he knows full well are GFDL compliant, based on his over-strict interpretation of the rules, or what he would like the rules to be. I have already warned him before to keep his zeal in check. He is once again wasting other people's and his own time with this anal retentivenes. -- Ohc ¡digame! 00:32, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- I copied the Commons description/licensing to the local description page, which should resolve any concerns about the attribution. January ( talk) 23:05, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete copy-vio revision. -- TLSuda ( talk) 00:20, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- File:Lateral2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file. The revision by User:Treeoflife23 is a copyright violation. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:33, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.