- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: deleted two revisions. File was renamed as File:Walls converge at the corner.jpg Diannaa ( talk) 04:29, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:Corner.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file: three in one.
- File by Pharmakon ( talk · contribs): Source and licence provided by Howcheng ( talk · contribs) in Special:Diff/145794125. No idea where he got this information from. The uploader himself claimed that the file was non-free in Special:PermanentLink/39227152.
- File by Rboyer1 ( talk · contribs): no source and no licence.
- File by JohnPaulSchilling ( talk · contribs): no source and no licence. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:15, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- If you look at the
log for this file, there was one previous file uploaded by
Joelsmith. That was the one with the non-free license. The version by Pharmakon was declared public domain by the uploader. —
howcheng {
chat}
06:06, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- I see. Overwritten files are always very complex matters... -- Stefan2 ( talk) 16:37, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- If you look at the
log for this file, there was one previous file uploaded by
Joelsmith. That was the one with the non-free license. The version by Pharmakon was declared public domain by the uploader. —
howcheng {
chat}
06:06, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: deleted one revision. File was renamed as File:Corydoras paleatus 2007.jpg Diannaa ( talk) 04:13, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:Corydoras paleatus 1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file: two in one.
- File by Pmalkowski ( talk · contribs): This one appears to be properly sourced and licensed.
- File by Gil ong81 ( talk · contribs): No source and no licence. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:25, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:Cottage.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file: two in one:
- File uploaded by Marauder ( talk · contribs) and Only ( talk · contribs): no source. Missing evidence of publication before 1923.
- File uploaded by Ears823 ( talk · contribs): no licence. The source is {{ somewebsite}}, now {{ dead link}}. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:29, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:Cover3.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Dubious own work: book cover. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:38, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted - the choice of license was not the only problem (although if these jerseys are a derivative of jerseys that someone else drew, you do need to credit that person, not just make the licenses match). The issue was the copyrighted helmet logo.
- File:CFL CAL Jersey Alternates.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative work. Eeekster ( talk) 04:30, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Corrected the licensing, fixed your problem. Cmm3 ( talk) 12:51, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Invalid public domain reason. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:20, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:Boustead-Heavy-Logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Invalid public domain claim due to the background. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:21, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:Sabooor1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- If this is own work as claimed, then why did a crop of the image appear here before the file was uploaded to Wikipedia? Stefan2 ( talk) 15:36, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:SamMartinSinger.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be copyvio as the rest of the files by this uploader, but I can only find smaller copies, e.g. [1]. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:46, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Invalid public domain reason. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:47, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:LIBNhom41234.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- This looks like a scan from a book. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:01, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:Crest.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file: three in one.
- File uploaded by Fluidfuzion ( talk · contribs) and Asteele ( talk · contribs): no evidence of permission.
- File uploaded by Asteele ( talk · contribs): no source and no licence.
- File uploaded by Asf08 ( talk · contribs): no source and no licence, but the upload summary contains the words "fair rationale", suggesting that the file is unfree. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:37, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Overwritten file: two in one.
- File uploaded by Checkiema ( talk · contribs): properly sourced and licensed. Keep this one.
- File uploaded by Jedianikin ( talk · contribs): no source and no licence. Delete this one. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:40, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:12, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:Cup.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file: two in one.
- File uploaded by Kiwiaussiemike ( talk · contribs) and R. S. Shaw ( talk · contribs): this is a derivative work.
- File uploaded by
Rovendley (
talk ·
contribs): no source and no licence. According to the upload summary, the image is an unfree logo, but the image is obviously not a logo.
Stefan2 (
talk)
17:08, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- R. S. Shaw's revision was just a revert to Kiwiaussiemike's version, which had been overlaid by Rovendley's unrelated image. They both seem crappy and removal would be no loss IMHO. -- R. S. Shaw ( talk) 07:41, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted. Neither image has a source. Diannaa ( talk) 14:04, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:Cuprill.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file: two in one. The file uploaded by Hectorc2 ( talk · contribs) is missing source and licence. Stefan2 ( talk) 17:11, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The original 2008 image had no verifiaction of the PD licence and I doubt the uploader actually took the formal military photo of Oppenheimer. The recent one has no licence and neither are sourced. At this stage I don't think the images should be split. The subject is dead so one non-free image could possibly be kept for identification purposes in the infobox of Charles Cuprill Oppenheimer. ww2censor ( talk) 13:47, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- I am the rightful owner of this photograph, also anyone has my express permission to use this image under the legal doctrine known as "fair use" or otherwise. @Stefan2 "Any person who, with fraudulent intent, places on any article a notice of copyright or words of the same purport that such person knows to be false, or who, with fraudulent intent, publicly distributes or imports for public distribution any article bearing such notice or words that such person knows to be false, shall be fined not more than $2,500. 17 USC § 506(c) (2014)." /s/ Hector R. Cuprill, Jr., Esq.
http://hectorc2.tripod.com — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Hectorc2 (
talk •
contribs)
- Being the owner of a copy of a photograph is not the same thing as being the owner of the copyright to that photograph. Additionally, there is no evidence that the photograph satisfies WP:NFCC#4, so fair use is no option. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 18:23, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Besides which, Wikipedia does not subscribe to the use of copyright image under the fair-use principle, instead we have a more stringant policy for non-free content and all such usages must comply with all 10 non-free content policy criteria. ww2censor ( talk) 11:52, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I am the rightful owner of this photograph, also anyone has my express permission to use this image under the legal doctrine known as "fair use" or otherwise. @Stefan2 "Any person who, with fraudulent intent, places on any article a notice of copyright or words of the same purport that such person knows to be false, or who, with fraudulent intent, publicly distributes or imports for public distribution any article bearing such notice or words that such person knows to be false, shall be fined not more than $2,500. 17 USC § 506(c) (2014)." /s/ Hector R. Cuprill, Jr., Esq.
http://hectorc2.tripod.com — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Hectorc2 (
talk •
contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Missing evidence that the coin was published more than 50 years ago as required by {{ PD-UKGov}}. Stefan2 ( talk) 17:20, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:Peacetwopounds.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Missing evidence that the coin was published more than 50 years ago as required by {{ PD-UKGov}}. Stefan2 ( talk) 17:20, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: deleted two revisions. File was renamed as File:Walls converge at the corner.jpg Diannaa ( talk) 04:29, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:Corner.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file: three in one.
- File by Pharmakon ( talk · contribs): Source and licence provided by Howcheng ( talk · contribs) in Special:Diff/145794125. No idea where he got this information from. The uploader himself claimed that the file was non-free in Special:PermanentLink/39227152.
- File by Rboyer1 ( talk · contribs): no source and no licence.
- File by JohnPaulSchilling ( talk · contribs): no source and no licence. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:15, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- If you look at the
log for this file, there was one previous file uploaded by
Joelsmith. That was the one with the non-free license. The version by Pharmakon was declared public domain by the uploader. —
howcheng {
chat}
06:06, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- I see. Overwritten files are always very complex matters... -- Stefan2 ( talk) 16:37, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- If you look at the
log for this file, there was one previous file uploaded by
Joelsmith. That was the one with the non-free license. The version by Pharmakon was declared public domain by the uploader. —
howcheng {
chat}
06:06, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: deleted one revision. File was renamed as File:Corydoras paleatus 2007.jpg Diannaa ( talk) 04:13, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:Corydoras paleatus 1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file: two in one.
- File by Pmalkowski ( talk · contribs): This one appears to be properly sourced and licensed.
- File by Gil ong81 ( talk · contribs): No source and no licence. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:25, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:Cottage.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file: two in one:
- File uploaded by Marauder ( talk · contribs) and Only ( talk · contribs): no source. Missing evidence of publication before 1923.
- File uploaded by Ears823 ( talk · contribs): no licence. The source is {{ somewebsite}}, now {{ dead link}}. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:29, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:Cover3.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Dubious own work: book cover. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:38, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted - the choice of license was not the only problem (although if these jerseys are a derivative of jerseys that someone else drew, you do need to credit that person, not just make the licenses match). The issue was the copyrighted helmet logo.
- File:CFL CAL Jersey Alternates.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative work. Eeekster ( talk) 04:30, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Corrected the licensing, fixed your problem. Cmm3 ( talk) 12:51, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Invalid public domain reason. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:20, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:Boustead-Heavy-Logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Invalid public domain claim due to the background. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:21, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:Sabooor1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- If this is own work as claimed, then why did a crop of the image appear here before the file was uploaded to Wikipedia? Stefan2 ( talk) 15:36, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:SamMartinSinger.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be copyvio as the rest of the files by this uploader, but I can only find smaller copies, e.g. [1]. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:46, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Invalid public domain reason. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:47, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:LIBNhom41234.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- This looks like a scan from a book. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:01, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:Crest.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file: three in one.
- File uploaded by Fluidfuzion ( talk · contribs) and Asteele ( talk · contribs): no evidence of permission.
- File uploaded by Asteele ( talk · contribs): no source and no licence.
- File uploaded by Asf08 ( talk · contribs): no source and no licence, but the upload summary contains the words "fair rationale", suggesting that the file is unfree. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:37, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Overwritten file: two in one.
- File uploaded by Checkiema ( talk · contribs): properly sourced and licensed. Keep this one.
- File uploaded by Jedianikin ( talk · contribs): no source and no licence. Delete this one. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:40, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:12, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:Cup.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file: two in one.
- File uploaded by Kiwiaussiemike ( talk · contribs) and R. S. Shaw ( talk · contribs): this is a derivative work.
- File uploaded by
Rovendley (
talk ·
contribs): no source and no licence. According to the upload summary, the image is an unfree logo, but the image is obviously not a logo.
Stefan2 (
talk)
17:08, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- R. S. Shaw's revision was just a revert to Kiwiaussiemike's version, which had been overlaid by Rovendley's unrelated image. They both seem crappy and removal would be no loss IMHO. -- R. S. Shaw ( talk) 07:41, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted. Neither image has a source. Diannaa ( talk) 14:04, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:Cuprill.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file: two in one. The file uploaded by Hectorc2 ( talk · contribs) is missing source and licence. Stefan2 ( talk) 17:11, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The original 2008 image had no verifiaction of the PD licence and I doubt the uploader actually took the formal military photo of Oppenheimer. The recent one has no licence and neither are sourced. At this stage I don't think the images should be split. The subject is dead so one non-free image could possibly be kept for identification purposes in the infobox of Charles Cuprill Oppenheimer. ww2censor ( talk) 13:47, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- I am the rightful owner of this photograph, also anyone has my express permission to use this image under the legal doctrine known as "fair use" or otherwise. @Stefan2 "Any person who, with fraudulent intent, places on any article a notice of copyright or words of the same purport that such person knows to be false, or who, with fraudulent intent, publicly distributes or imports for public distribution any article bearing such notice or words that such person knows to be false, shall be fined not more than $2,500. 17 USC § 506(c) (2014)." /s/ Hector R. Cuprill, Jr., Esq.
http://hectorc2.tripod.com — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Hectorc2 (
talk •
contribs)
- Being the owner of a copy of a photograph is not the same thing as being the owner of the copyright to that photograph. Additionally, there is no evidence that the photograph satisfies WP:NFCC#4, so fair use is no option. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 18:23, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Besides which, Wikipedia does not subscribe to the use of copyright image under the fair-use principle, instead we have a more stringant policy for non-free content and all such usages must comply with all 10 non-free content policy criteria. ww2censor ( talk) 11:52, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I am the rightful owner of this photograph, also anyone has my express permission to use this image under the legal doctrine known as "fair use" or otherwise. @Stefan2 "Any person who, with fraudulent intent, places on any article a notice of copyright or words of the same purport that such person knows to be false, or who, with fraudulent intent, publicly distributes or imports for public distribution any article bearing such notice or words that such person knows to be false, shall be fined not more than $2,500. 17 USC § 506(c) (2014)." /s/ Hector R. Cuprill, Jr., Esq.
http://hectorc2.tripod.com — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Hectorc2 (
talk •
contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Missing evidence that the coin was published more than 50 years ago as required by {{ PD-UKGov}}. Stefan2 ( talk) 17:20, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:Peacetwopounds.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Missing evidence that the coin was published more than 50 years ago as required by {{ PD-UKGov}}. Stefan2 ( talk) 17:20, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.