April 17
File:Es2004 reichstagdome.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:24, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- File:Es2004 reichstagdome.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Images of the inside of buildings aren't covered by German freedom of panorama. See this deletion discussion on Commons. Mike Peel ( talk) 06:03, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Leaflet ordering registration of the Jews.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:24, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- The IP of blocked user Cmoibenlepro has repeatedly posted a deletion notice arguing that: "this file is copied from http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/donetsk-pro-russians-order-jews-register-be-deported-supporting-kiev-rule-1445111, ... and the uploader does not assert fair use". It seemed a good idea to have a deletion discussion, so that this can be discussed properly. The leaflet purports to be from the Donetsk People's Republic, which claims to be a state. If this is so, it is a state organisation, and the leaflet is in the public domain. The newspaper does not own the copyright on the image of the leaflet it published. Toddy1 ( talk) 07:53, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- This seems to be an obvious copyright violation. I opened the website from the citation, and the picture is clearly taken from there. No information about Permission was provided. And the so-called Donetsk Republic is not a real country.
- Here is were the picture was copied from [1] 69.156.130.146 ( talk) 08:20, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:08, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I do not see how the image can be non-free when the newspaper does not own the copyright to the image. The copyright holder would be the ones who made the leaflets and that currently remains unknown. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 05:41, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
April 17
File:Es2004 reichstagdome.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:24, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- File:Es2004 reichstagdome.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Images of the inside of buildings aren't covered by German freedom of panorama. See this deletion discussion on Commons. Mike Peel ( talk) 06:03, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Leaflet ordering registration of the Jews.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:24, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- The IP of blocked user Cmoibenlepro has repeatedly posted a deletion notice arguing that: "this file is copied from http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/donetsk-pro-russians-order-jews-register-be-deported-supporting-kiev-rule-1445111, ... and the uploader does not assert fair use". It seemed a good idea to have a deletion discussion, so that this can be discussed properly. The leaflet purports to be from the Donetsk People's Republic, which claims to be a state. If this is so, it is a state organisation, and the leaflet is in the public domain. The newspaper does not own the copyright on the image of the leaflet it published. Toddy1 ( talk) 07:53, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- This seems to be an obvious copyright violation. I opened the website from the citation, and the picture is clearly taken from there. No information about Permission was provided. And the so-called Donetsk Republic is not a real country.
- Here is were the picture was copied from [1] 69.156.130.146 ( talk) 08:20, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:08, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I do not see how the image can be non-free when the newspaper does not own the copyright to the image. The copyright holder would be the ones who made the leaflets and that currently remains unknown. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 05:41, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.