The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Closed as Keep; there's no consensus to delete the file. Dianna ( talk) 13:48, 21 April 2013 (UTC) reply

File:BDS sewer system.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• It says that "NGO Monitor agrees to release the graphic of the BDS Sewer System for use on Wikipedia under Creative Commons 3.0. as per Wikipedia Page" but it doesn't tell which Creative Commons licence the copyright holder chose to use. It could be anything from CC-BY to CC-BY-NC-ND. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:35, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply

  It seems likely to me that they added that section in order to specify that the uploader here, at English Wikipedia, was representing their company when s/he chose to license it as CC-BY-3.0. Don't you agree? Can't we get them to change it to specify further? Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 00:34, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply

  Seems very likely to me, but it would be nice if they could make the notice more specific. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 21:12, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 7 April 2013 (UTC) reply

File:Nubianarchers1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• The description says this image comes from http://edsitement.neh.gov/, apparently from a lesson plan called "The Sudan". (I can't find this lesson plan or this image on the site; maybe they've been deleted.) The conditions of use for the site say, "No copyright is claimed as to matters in the public domain. Contributors to the site retain copyright in the material they provide." So it's clear that this site, while having a .gov URL, contains content that is not the work of the U.S. federal government and is copyrighted. No evidence is provided that this particular image was created by the federal government. — Bkell ( talk) 17:09, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Yep, wysinger.homestead.com/nubianarchers.html (which is blocked by the spam filter) has an uncropped and higher res version of the image. (It's clearly the same photo - not just a different photo of the same display - the reflections in the glass are identical.) I don't think we can reasonably assume that the federal government is the source of this image. -- B ( talk) 13:54, 7 April 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:14, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply

File:Axkaryotype.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a modification of a figure published in an academic journal, the Canadian Journal of Zoology, in 2004. (See [1] for the table of contents for the issue in which it was published.) The image was apparently uploaded here by one of the authors of this paper. According to the publisher's page about authors' rights, Canadian Science Publishing or its licensors hold the copyright to all articles published before 2009, which would include this image. That page goes on to detail the rights that authors hold, but it is doubtful that the author has the right to release this image under a Creative Commons license as claimed. — Bkell ( talk) 17:23, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 13 February 2013 (UTC) reply

File:Aimee Echo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Tagged {{ cc-by-sa-2.5}}, but the Flickr source page [2] says it's licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic. "NonCommercial" is not free enough for Wikipedia. — Bkell ( talk) 17:27, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply

File:Island Coast High School Construction.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is captioned as being created by Florida Aerial Services, Inc and even has a control number in the bottom right corner. It would be very unlikely that such a quality photo would be released freely. Most likely uploader is not owner of copyright. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 18:17, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply

File:Island Coast High School Finished.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is captioned as being created by Florida Aerial Services, Inc and even has a control number in the bottom right corner. It would be very unlikely that such a quality photo would be released freely. Most likely uploader is not owner of copyright. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 18:18, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 13 February 2013 (UTC) reply

File:Yara Arts Group's "Howling" (2002).jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• See the EXIF data. Eeekster ( talk) 23:01, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply

File:IBMC-FTC-campus.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is most likely not free as it matches the same design for all of the images on the Institute of Business and Medical Careers website (see here). Image is web resolution. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 23:10, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.