The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
INeverCry (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 21:14, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Diannaa (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 06:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result of the discussion was: Fair use. Per my closure at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 April 19. Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 22:41, 9 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Fair use. Per my closure at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 April 19. I am not commenting on the whether this is valid fair use or not; that can be a separate discussion. However, I will point out that a widely used exemption to WP:NFC#UULP is when it is essentially impossible to snap a photograph, such as when a person is incarcerated. Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 22:45, 9 May 2013 (UTC) reply
If it is published by the FBI, it is public domain. Pollack man34 ( talk) 15:53, 20 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete, looks like the copyright violation-- Ymblanter ( talk) 10:28, 12 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Diannaa (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 06:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Diannaa (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 06:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Diannaa (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 06:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
INeverCry (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 21:14, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Diannaa (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 06:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result of the discussion was: Fair use. Per my closure at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 April 19. Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 22:41, 9 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Fair use. Per my closure at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 April 19. I am not commenting on the whether this is valid fair use or not; that can be a separate discussion. However, I will point out that a widely used exemption to WP:NFC#UULP is when it is essentially impossible to snap a photograph, such as when a person is incarcerated. Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 22:45, 9 May 2013 (UTC) reply
If it is published by the FBI, it is public domain. Pollack man34 ( talk) 15:53, 20 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete, looks like the copyright violation-- Ymblanter ( talk) 10:28, 12 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Diannaa (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 06:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Diannaa (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 06:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Diannaa (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 06:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
reply