The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep per the comment left on the talk page. Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 05:52, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Cante Tanke "Great Heart", The Wigwam, Du Bois, PA, c.1950.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• I cannot see any reason that this image is public domain, particularly given the poor provenance. Peripitus (Talk) 00:11, 19 August 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep, this appears to be an improperly formatted {{ pd-self}}. Notice that the uploader is Richlevine00 and the find a grave sight was uploaded by Richard Levine.  Ryan  Vesey 00:14, 19 August 2012 (UTC) reply
  • PD-self? Than why author is "unknown"? Bulwersator ( talk) 15:20, 19 August 2012 (UTC) reply

It appears to be a scan of a printed work. Date is noted as c.1950's......the Find-a-grave uploader and the uploader here may the same person but they do not appear to be the original copyright holder. PD-self is not the appropriate licence and the copyright holder (and the original scanned source) are not identified - Peripitus (Talk) 12:44, 20 August 2012 (UTC) reply

• Delete There is no way to prove that the unknown photographer has released the photo to the public domain and there is no way to find out whether the photo is in the public domain without knowing where it comes from. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 17:46, 20 August 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: marked fair use. We need to receive OTRS permission in order to host the higher resolution version; feel free to ask me or at WP:MCQ if you would like instructions. Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 05:56, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Pak-Canoe Kayak Federation.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• logo for Pakistan Canoe and Kayak Federation, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need to keep user-created non-official artwork Skier Dude ( talk) 00:17, 19 August 2012 (UTC) reply

LOGO of Pakistan Canoe and Kayak Federation Design by Muhammad Abubakar Durrani Youth Coordinator PCKF has personally handed-over this file in Quetta to me for Wikipedia common use regarding information about Pakistan canoe and Kayak Federation and there is no dispute about copy right if people use it about Pakistan Canoe and Kayak Federation.--Baloch Warrior 22:59, 19 August 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baloch Baba ( talk • contribs)

See the image talk page and above - he claims it was "handed over" but also claims pd-self. The "handed over" claim means that it must be cleared through WP:OTRS. Skier Dude ( talk) 03:58, 20 August 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete: Most had no metadata, and those that did had four different cameras (all in 2007? no one buys four cameras in a year). Many were low resolution. One had a © copyright watermark. All were unused, and a few were low quality. Most had inadequate descriptions with which to make the file useful. Dianna ( talk) 02:31, 17 September 2012 (UTC) All files uploaded by Chokolate ( talk · contribs) are stolen. reply

• File:Puertaa.JPG
• File:Auraedificios.JPG
• File:Chapu.jpg
• File:Puertadehierro.JPG
• File:Torre de hierro.JPG
• File:Centromedicoph.JPG
• File:Blvdph.jpg
• File:Phierro.JPG
• File:Avamericas.jpg
• File:Intercontinentalgdl.jpg
• File:Wtc gdl.JPG
• File:Puertaview.jpg
• File:Fiestaamericanagdl.jpg
• File:Parquecountrygdll.jpg
• File:Restoranvallarta.jpg
• File:Cancunbeach.jpg
• File:Cozumelrock.jpg
• File:Gdlphsky.jpg
• File:Panoramaph.jpg
• File:Bancomexicocolon.jpg
• File:Puertaahierrro.JPG
• File:Torrezsenseytitamum.jpg
• File:Torrecube.JPG
• File:Mexicosunsetangel.jpg
• File:Mexicoreformasky.jpg
• File:BolsaMexicana de Valores.jpg
• File:Milenioplaza.jpg
• File:Insidegaleriasmallgdl.jpg
• File:PHrecientebiggerf.JPG
• File:Andaresconstruction.jpg
• File:Catedralgdlnegro.jpg
• File:PaseodelaReformaMexDF.jpg
• File:Countrytardeada.jpg
• File:Hospitalph.jpg
• File:Phblvdconst.jpg
• File:Phconst.jpg
• File:Phtunel.jpg
• File:Phvistadesdeagencia.jpg
• File:Phconstt.jpg
• File:Centrosp.jpg

-- Martin H. ( talk) 11:58, 19 August 2012 (UTC) reply

• Any kind of proof? Bulwersator ( talk) 15:19, 19 August 2012 (UTC) reply

• above we have 8 red links. Thats 8 blatant copyvios. In August 2008 the user got notifications for a least 4 more copyvios. Please take an example from the list above and search the web for a similar file, you will see that the user not only made the ≥12 lies that we found out already. -- Martin H. ( talk) 19:03, 22 August 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

File:MOV00182 0002.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: orphaned low resolution image claimed to be the work of the uploader looks more like a web image. Can't see a use for this image especially as it has not been used for 6 years and besides which the description is unverifiable. ww2censor ( talk) 13:45, 19 August 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Mobileram.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unfortunately, there is no FOP for statues in USA ( http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States ) Bulwersator ( talk) 15:19, 19 August 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: fair use. Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 05:59, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Tandojam.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• logo for Sindh Agriculture University, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need to keep user-created non-official artwork Bulwersator ( talk) 15:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC) reply

• Instead of puffing, you could just fix this logo by adding a WP:FURG, {{ non-free logo}} and this appears to be a source. ww2censor ( talk) 17:15, 19 August 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: fair use. I've provided brief instructions above on how to go about proving it is free. Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 06:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

File:ASCHIANA-Logo---Transparent-Color-Small.gif ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• I doubt that uploader is the copyright holder of this work. Bulwersator ( talk) 15:49, 19 August 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 06:02, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

File:ShenLongcabin.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Really strange licensing, especially "© 2011 All rights reserved" linked in "however, as a courtesy, a link back to Macao Dragon website would be appreciated." Bulwersator ( talk) 15:51, 19 August 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep, I don't see the "All rights reserved"? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:43, 23 August 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 August 2012 (UTC) reply

File:POF Eye.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Seems to be stolen from http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/28/pof-eye-pakistan-corner-shot-clone/ (note white strip at bottom of our photo) Bulwersator ( talk) 15:54, 19 August 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: fair use. I've provided brief instructions above on how to go about proving it is free. Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 06:04, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Waconia.gif ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• I doubt that uploader is the copyright holder of this work Bulwersator ( talk) 16:22, 19 August 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 06:05, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

File:PUPInterfaithChapel.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Cf. Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 August 15#File:XYZ Building.jpg. Stefan2 ( talk) 17:02, 19 August 2012 (UTC) reply
• Comment. Despite my recent mass nomination of his images, I actually find his claim that it came from his cell phone slightly credible. It is clearly of cell phone quality, unlike his other images. I'm contacting him for clarification on his talk page. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:51, 23 August 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. The evidence strongly points in favor of it being from his cell phone. I contacted him on his talk page, and he replied with the name of his phone. I researched the phone online and found that the resolution of the image did not match the resolution in the specs. I asked him to upload the original, and he did so here: File:PUPInterfaithChapelOriginalLove.jpg. Unfortunately it appears that this phone's name does not appear in the EXIF data, though I'm not surprised considering this is a pretty obscure phone (I had to search everywhere just to get the specs). However, the now matching resolution and the general cell phone quality of the image make it highly likely that the uploader's claim is legitimate. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:54, 25 August 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.