The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 22 April 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Dan Connor.jpeg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is likely from http://www.panthers.com/news/article-1/Strickly-Panthers-Walking-talking-wounded/e9e2dbc1-c549-43be-b485-c9b65dcc9583, thus copyrighted and unfree Mosmof ( talk) 04:38, 14 April 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 22 April 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Aerial kos.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• The image has been uploaded with a CC-BY-SA 3.0 license with the url www.airphoto.gr in the upload summary. Searching that site shows that there are some free images hosted at http://www.airphoto.gr/free_aerial_photos.html. However, the license there is CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0 meaning that the image is not valid for commercial use and therefore a licence that is incompatible with Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags/Deprecated#Non-free_Creative_Commons_licenses. 90.220.200.125 ( talk) 06:36, 14 April 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 22 April 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Dan Bongino US Senate.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• I tagged this as {{ di-no source no license}} a couple of days ago. A licence was added, but there is still no source. Stefan2 ( talk) 12:35, 14 April 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 22 April 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Afc.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• A thumbnail appeared here before the Wikipedia upload. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:49, 14 April 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 22 April 2012 (UTC) reply

File:98BOAT 01 23 09 153k.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a professional piece of work. Cloudbound ( talk) 18:06, 14 April 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Samir ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:18, 14 April 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Form 1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Are we really sure that this is own work? Isn't it more likely that it is a direct copy of the original "form 1"? Stefan2 ( talk) 20:02, 14 April 2012 (UTC) reply
  • I don't remember. I think I mocked it in powerpoint but don't recall. It has a typo and an extra line at the top, but is orphaned and antiquated, so I will delete it. -- Samir 20:26, 14 April 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep, permission received. — ξ ^xplicit 05:02, 16 May 2012 (UTC) reply

File:NanoCAD 3.5 screenshot.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• The licence seems to be wrong. I can't find any statement about any free licence on the software website, so likely not free software.

• This screenshot I've received from Dmitry Popov, who is director of Nanosoft, through the mail. You could see the letter below:

"Valeriya, Screenshot of nanoCAD 3.5 was made and edited by Nanosoft for usage in the nanoCAD Wikipedia article. Nanosoft grants rights to reproduce it in any sources of information, including Internet as copyleft material. Best regards, Dmitry Popov Product Launch Director ZAO «Nanosoft» Marshala Timoshenko 17 bld. 1, Moscow, 121359, Russia Phone: +7 (495) 645-8626 ext. 107 Fax: +7 (495) 645-8627"

You can contact him to be sure.

Hello! I had made this screenshot of nanoCAD software. Valeriya can use it for this article about nanoCAD 3.5. Best regards, Vsevolod Mayskiy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vmaiski ( talk • contribs) 13:50, 9 April 2012 (UTC) reply

• Two hyperlinks below confirm that software is free:

http://nanocad.com/page/txtWhyNanoCAD

http://nanocad.com/page/FAQ#Free — Preceding unsigned comment added by ValeriyaR ( talk • contribs) 08:30, 9 April 2012 (UTC) reply

I'm doing an outbound contact to the company via OTRS. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 21:03, 14 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Relisted in order to gain more time for OTRS ticket to complete. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 21:05, 14 April 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 22 April 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Lala Shevket.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Something is fishy here. This was uploaded in 2006 as own work by User:Sidgi. Now check Commons: same file name, uploaded in 2008, but the one on Wikipedia is cropped. The one on Commons is claimed to be own work by Commons:User:Sidqihaciyev. Is this the same user or not? If it is a different user, how did the Commons user have access to an uncropped version of this photo which was uploaded to Wikipedia two years earlier? And here: "Фото: ИА REGNUM". This copy on Shevket's personal web site was last modified in 2007, it seems. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:27, 14 April 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 22 April 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Varagavank view.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• It says that the uploader himself took this photo in 1900. Was the uploader at least 110 years at the time of the upload? Stefan2 ( talk) 23:01, 14 April 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 22 April 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Newman Center.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Earlier upload here. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:22, 14 April 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.