The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 17 August 2011 (UTC) reply

File:Stealth bomber 2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Lockheed publicity photo so no way this is a Department of Defense photo. Marcus Qwertyus 10:57, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 17 August 2011 (UTC) reply

File:DSC02200 jubbal.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphaned, probably unfree copyrighted image used for advertising. Fallschirmjäger  ✉ 17:06, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 17 August 2011 (UTC) reply

File:Adi-Santo-Guru.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Doubt this is the work of the uploader, some kind of painting/drawing. Acather96 ( talk) 20:16, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply

No problem with the photo.

This is not a photograph.It is a painting .It has no copyright.This is the only painting of the Prophet of Matua-sect of Hinduism is available.Hope there is no problem any more.Some follower must have uploaded. It is genuine. 117.194.196.79 ( talk) 12:49, 15 August 2011 (UTC) reply

• Delete, presumably copyrighted. – Quadell ^{( talk)} 17:37, 16 August 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 17 August 2011 (UTC) reply

File:Namassej symbol brinha.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Some kind of symbol/logo, claimed {{ Wikipedia-screenshot}} though it's obviously not. Doubt this is the work of the uploader. Orphaned and unencyclopedic. Acather96 ( talk) 20:18, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 17 August 2011 (UTC) reply

File:San Marino CAL.gif ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• City seal, doubt the {{ PD-self}} claim. Acather96 ( talk) 20:27, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
• Agreed. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 14:18, 8 August 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 17 August 2011 (UTC) reply

File:Self-portrait.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Self-portrait of Paul Spike, doubt the uploader's self-gfdl claim is true/valid. Acather96 ( talk) 21:00, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ ^xplicit 00:39, 17 August 2011 (UTC) reply

File:Sigiriya mirror wall1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Description states that all rights are reserved, but then tagged self-gfdl. Acather96 ( talk) 21:04, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
• Keep, this is legitimately GFDL, per Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2011_August_4#File:Battery_Plan.JPG – Quadell ^{( talk)} 18:06, 16 August 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 7 August 2011 (UTC) reply

File:Dr RajReddy CMU.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Same shoot as File:RajReddy.JPG. Seems like a promo photo of Dr. Reddy, and probably belongs to him. Similar to the one used here. Muhandes ( talk) 21:48, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply
• I found the image itself being used here. -- Muhandes ( talk) 09:23, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 17 August 2011 (UTC) reply

File:Tempio dei Dioscuri.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unconfirmable licensing status. it:File:Tempio dei Dioscuri.jpg does not exist like the file description says it should. – Drilnoth ( T/ C) 22:07, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 17 August 2011 (UTC) reply

File:Soviet and British soldiers in Iran.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Almost certainly not GFDL. Possibly PD to age and country of origin, but I'm not sure. Orphaned anyway. – Drilnoth ( T/ C) 22:11, 3 August 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.