From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
April 14
File:Fazlollah Expressway.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
After Midnight (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 21:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
reply
- File:Fazlollah Expressway.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- LIcense not compatable with that at the source (Non-commercial use only). Doesn't appear to be a work of the uploader as claimed by the copyright tag. Eeekster ( talk) 01:03, 14 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- Delete Uploader has a long history of problematic uploads both here and on Commons. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 18:21, 15 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:BRT Tehran bus.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
After Midnight (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 21:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
reply
- File:BRT Tehran bus.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader is not the copyright owner as stated by the tag. Source URL does not point to the page with this image and pages with images claim copyright with no mention of CC licensing. Eeekster ( talk) 01:42, 14 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- delete most likely an image copied from the internet (see the watermark) that an unexperienced user tagged as self-free. -- Damiens.rf 17:04, 26 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Niayesh.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
After Midnight (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 22:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
reply
- File:Niayesh.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Source indicates a non-compatible license (CC with attribution and no derivative works). Eeekster ( talk) 02:12, 14 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- Delete: incompatible licence at source. ww2censor ( talk) 16:29, 16 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:FV Northwestern.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
After Midnight (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 22:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
reply
- File:FV Northwestern.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Source indicated incompatible license (no commercial use) Eeekster ( talk) 02:33, 14 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- delete indeed not free at flickr and not usable as non-free (replaceable). -- Damiens.rf 17:05, 26 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Per qualche dollaro in più titlejpg.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
VernoWhitney (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 17:14, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
reply
- File:Per qualche dollaro in più titlejpg.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Angeleyescleef.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Per Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 February 24#File:For a Few Dollars More 1965 finale.jpg, For a Few Dollars More and The Good, the Bad and the Ugly have valid US copyright protection that are still in existence. The PD claims are in mistake. Neither of these two images have valid claim for fair use (the first is a title shot of no special properties commented by critics, and the second is of a character design not commented on at all). Jappalang ( talk) 02:58, 14 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Yviuv.png
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
After Midnight (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 22:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
reply
- File:Yviuv.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader clearly isn't (c) holder - sourced to youtube with musician as the author; no evidence it is CC1.0 Skier Dude ( talk) 04:56, 14 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- delete - screenshot of otherwise copyrighted video. -- Damiens.rf 17:13, 26 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Tcidkrmai.png
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
After Midnight (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 22:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
reply
- File:Tcidkrmai.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- uploader clearly is not (c) holder; sourced to "dirkmai" - no note of any (c) on the author's page that I could find. Also does not have any indication of permission received. Skier Dude ( talk) 05:00, 14 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Freeman High School.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
After Midnight (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 22:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
reply
- File:Freeman High School.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is listed as a U.S. Government work but is only found at the local school district's website. No indications the work is not copyrighted by the district or in the public domain. JonRidinger ( talk) 17:27, 14 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- Non-free, with an incorrect PD-USGov tag. Not a work of the federal government, and I don't think Virginia has laws stating that works of state governmental bodies are in the public domain unless specified (like Florida does). RJaguar3 | u | t 22:02, 20 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Holly Lewis at Schmooze 2005.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
VernoWhitney (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 17:14, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
reply
- The permission given is The photographer's profile can be found at http://www.pbase.com/bonseye/profile, and she provides the following copyright information: The photo of Holly Lewis can be used freely by Wikipedia AND its downstream users, including commercial use, for which I understand and agree that I'm not entitled to any royalties or compensation.
- However that does NOT appear on the web site (it may have once...) - All I can find is All photographs on this web site are copyright Bonnie W, 2001-2009. Do not copy ,link, or use in any fashion without permission. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:48, 14 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- The bit I have there (The photo of Holly Lewis can be used freely by Wikipedia AND its downstream users, including commercial use, for which I understand and agree that I'm not entitled to any royalties or compensation.) was in email with the photographer, though I can no longer find the email. Should I email her again about it? Mofoburrell ( talk) 13:00, 17 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
April 14
File:Fazlollah Expressway.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
After Midnight (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 21:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
reply
- File:Fazlollah Expressway.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- LIcense not compatable with that at the source (Non-commercial use only). Doesn't appear to be a work of the uploader as claimed by the copyright tag. Eeekster ( talk) 01:03, 14 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- Delete Uploader has a long history of problematic uploads both here and on Commons. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 18:21, 15 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:BRT Tehran bus.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
After Midnight (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 21:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
reply
- File:BRT Tehran bus.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader is not the copyright owner as stated by the tag. Source URL does not point to the page with this image and pages with images claim copyright with no mention of CC licensing. Eeekster ( talk) 01:42, 14 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- delete most likely an image copied from the internet (see the watermark) that an unexperienced user tagged as self-free. -- Damiens.rf 17:04, 26 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Niayesh.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
After Midnight (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 22:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
reply
- File:Niayesh.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Source indicates a non-compatible license (CC with attribution and no derivative works). Eeekster ( talk) 02:12, 14 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- Delete: incompatible licence at source. ww2censor ( talk) 16:29, 16 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:FV Northwestern.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
After Midnight (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 22:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
reply
- File:FV Northwestern.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Source indicated incompatible license (no commercial use) Eeekster ( talk) 02:33, 14 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- delete indeed not free at flickr and not usable as non-free (replaceable). -- Damiens.rf 17:05, 26 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Per qualche dollaro in più titlejpg.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
VernoWhitney (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 17:14, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
reply
- File:Per qualche dollaro in più titlejpg.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Angeleyescleef.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Per Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 February 24#File:For a Few Dollars More 1965 finale.jpg, For a Few Dollars More and The Good, the Bad and the Ugly have valid US copyright protection that are still in existence. The PD claims are in mistake. Neither of these two images have valid claim for fair use (the first is a title shot of no special properties commented by critics, and the second is of a character design not commented on at all). Jappalang ( talk) 02:58, 14 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Yviuv.png
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
After Midnight (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 22:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
reply
- File:Yviuv.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader clearly isn't (c) holder - sourced to youtube with musician as the author; no evidence it is CC1.0 Skier Dude ( talk) 04:56, 14 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- delete - screenshot of otherwise copyrighted video. -- Damiens.rf 17:13, 26 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Tcidkrmai.png
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
After Midnight (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 22:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
reply
- File:Tcidkrmai.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- uploader clearly is not (c) holder; sourced to "dirkmai" - no note of any (c) on the author's page that I could find. Also does not have any indication of permission received. Skier Dude ( talk) 05:00, 14 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Freeman High School.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
After Midnight (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 22:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
reply
- File:Freeman High School.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is listed as a U.S. Government work but is only found at the local school district's website. No indications the work is not copyrighted by the district or in the public domain. JonRidinger ( talk) 17:27, 14 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- Non-free, with an incorrect PD-USGov tag. Not a work of the federal government, and I don't think Virginia has laws stating that works of state governmental bodies are in the public domain unless specified (like Florida does). RJaguar3 | u | t 22:02, 20 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Holly Lewis at Schmooze 2005.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
VernoWhitney (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 17:14, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
reply
- The permission given is The photographer's profile can be found at http://www.pbase.com/bonseye/profile, and she provides the following copyright information: The photo of Holly Lewis can be used freely by Wikipedia AND its downstream users, including commercial use, for which I understand and agree that I'm not entitled to any royalties or compensation.
- However that does NOT appear on the web site (it may have once...) - All I can find is All photographs on this web site are copyright Bonnie W, 2001-2009. Do not copy ,link, or use in any fashion without permission. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:48, 14 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- The bit I have there (The photo of Holly Lewis can be used freely by Wikipedia AND its downstream users, including commercial use, for which I understand and agree that I'm not entitled to any royalties or compensation.) was in email with the photographer, though I can no longer find the email. Should I email her again about it? Mofoburrell ( talk) 13:00, 17 April 2011 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.