The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted here to attract more comments . -- ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 15:31, 6 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Haugsetting2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source does not give original date of painting; I cannot determine it is after 1923. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 02:19, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply
• Keep - I fail to see the problem here. This is an old public domain Norwegian educational poster that a university has made available for anyone to use on condition that it is attributed to them, see [1]. It is already properly tagged for that purpose.-- Berig ( talk) 17:55, 14 September 2010 (UTC) reply

  Per my statement at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 September 6#File:Haugsetting.jpg, I do not believe it's PD. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 19:21, 14 September 2010 (UTC) reply

• That nomination was closed as keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:44, 16 September 2010 (UTC) reply

• Comment - TBH, I'm not sure why it was closed as keep: we never addressed if the image was created after 1922 or not. I may do some research and ask the admin to reconsider. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 14:12, 16 September 2010 (UTC) reply
• Comment - the earlier image has now been altered to close as delete. Maybe this will assist someone in finally closing this discussion. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 23:11, 5 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted here to attract more comments . -- ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 15:31, 6 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Lackawaxen.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Neither uploader nor subsequent article give any indication on author and/or if this is pre-1923. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 02:25, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

• Pinged uploader to remind him. And can I remind the nominator and closer that 1923 is not the only relevant date. Given the low rate of renewals, 1963 (date to which renewals required) and even 1977 (explicit notice required) are also important. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:37, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

• True, but uploader provided evidence for neither of those either. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 04:06, 24 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted here to attract more comments . -- ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 15:31, 6 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Minisink Ford.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• see above. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 02:25, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

• ditto. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:38, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Energy Micro EFM32 Giant Gecko Microcontroller.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• conflicting licensing; tagged as CC3, but states Owner=Energy Micro & links to their website; contains logos, etc. that are not de minimis - no proof of release to CC Skier Dude ( talk 06:05, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:KDP LOGO - JPEG.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• corporate logo; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is not (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 06:48, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:KPK Entertainment Wikipedia.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• corporate logo; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is not (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 06:49, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:KPK Entertainment logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• orphaned corporate logo; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is not (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 06:49, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Kandy City Centre Logo.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• corporate logo; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 06:51, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Karinplayboy.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• given file name (playboy) and metadata, suspect this is a scan from said magazine Skier Dude ( talk 06:52, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Karssk.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• sports logo; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 06:53, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

kept: the comments here are accurate for the USA, which is what matters here, but depending on what jurisdiction you live in you might not want to try this at home. See database right. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:34, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:ScythianC14AsiaEuropeFig6SketchEn.gif ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Highly dubious claim that "factual content is not subject to copyr." While the numbers in the graph may not be copyrightable per Feist, the image itself is. Selket ^Talk 07:14, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The "dubious claim" came from the WP admins that I consulted beforehand (Generally in the US, factual content cannot be copyrighted, though the selection, arrangement, or style of presentation might be (e.g. Feist v. Rural). Since your intention is to take part of the data (presumably copyright exempt) and create a new image from it, you probably have nothing to worry about. Dragons flight 15:41, 29 August 2006 (UTC)). That's why I recreated the graphics, which is copyrightable, and used the data contained in the original publication, which is not copyrightable. If you can advise on the changes to improve the GFDL status, I suppose it can be done, and I would appreciate your help. This one picture represents a result of many studies that are incementally vital to the article's subject. Do I need to respond elsewhere also? Barefact ( talk) 20:19, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

• Keep, as noted in the image description, this has "separate presentation artwork", which I take to be a statement of "I made my own way of representing these data". If that's correct (and I have no reason to say that it's not), this is not at all a problematic image. There's no way that factual content is subject to copyright; you can't sue for copyright violation just because I used some numbers that you researched and published. Nyttend ( talk) 03:24, 18 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Kazan collage.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• collage of 4 images, no sources given for images, therefore impossible to determine the correct (c) Skier Dude ( talk 07:16, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply
• Keep, it's an own work: no reason given to suspect that the uploader didn't take all of them. Nyttend ( talk) 03:24, 18 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:54, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Kdpic.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• orphaned, multiple watermarks, no target article provided to determine what this is supposed to be Skier Dude ( talk 07:16, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:KlickEx Logo.gif ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• corporate logo; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 07:24, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Kollias.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• appears to be promotional materials; no source; watermarked (c) frank marshall, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 07:25, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Komaram Puli.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• film poster; no source but lots of watermakrs; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 07:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Peter hein2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• promotional materials; watermarked; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 07:28, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Komaram Puli3.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• promotional materials; watermarked; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 07:28, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Konee-frame-skyline.gif ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• promotional photo; watermarked; states "donated by Konee Rok" bu no WP:OTRS proof, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 07:29, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:LaJoya2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• appears to be satellite image; without source, not possible to determine actual (c) state Skier Dude ( talk 07:34, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Lbpsb.gif ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• school logo; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 07:37, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Learning papers 2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• government or corporate newsletter covers; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 07:39, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Legacy 600.pdf ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• corporate promotional materials; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 07:39, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Citation mustang.pdf ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• publicity flier; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 07:41, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Hawker900xp.pdf ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• publicity flier; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 07:41, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Cepa logo color small.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• corporate logo; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 07:42, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Cepa logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• corporate logo; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 07:43, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Cepa logo CEPA.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• corporate logo; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 07:43, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Cover 28.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• magazine cover; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 07:43, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:LJalisco.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• appears to be satellite image; without source, not possible to determine actual (c) state Skier Dude ( talk 07:47, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:IJalisco.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• appears to be satellite image; without source, not possible to determine actual (c) state Skier Dude ( talk 07:48, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:30, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:LettheDeadSpeak.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• book cover; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 07:54, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

This book does not exist in real life. Well not yet !  Jon Ascton   (talk) 08:04, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Lily-allen-22.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• apparent album cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 07:55, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Lt. Fox Tiberon.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• appears to be screenshot/scan of comic, but my memory fails as to the exact comic series - just very familiar Skier Dude ( talk 07:58, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:F*ckYou.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• tagged as PD-self, but summary says "screenshot from... video" - if it is a screenshot, PD wouldn't be accurate Skier Dude ( talk 08:01, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:MDAC.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• conference/corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 08:05, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Macleod Kangaroos Logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• FC logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 08:07, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Insofar as practice represents policy, policy is to allow covers for identification. WP:NFCI says different, and since I happen to agree with policy we'll cheerfully enforce it here. Deleted. Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:20, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Majya jalmachi chttar katha.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• book cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 08:09, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • This is apparently a copyrighted image. But the subject is important enough as the book is first autobiography written by a female dalit. I have changed the lisence from pd-self to fair use. I am going to leave a message on uploaders talk page. Shivashree ( talk) 03:03, 9 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • This would still leave this open to deletion as there is no critical commentary on the book in the article and the book is used only in the infobox. FuR doesn't address these issues. Skier Dude ( talk 04:30, 9 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Malay people.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• collage of 12 images; no sources provided for any of them Skier Dude ( talk 08:13, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Maruthamallar.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• book cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 08:16, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:MattBrouwerWORnewCoverFINAL.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• album cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 08:18, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Maxnewyorklife logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• corporate logos; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 08:19, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Mohawk Area School District.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• school dist logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 08:22, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Now tagged as non-free and reduced. Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:55, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:PR Highres logo.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a Durham University, Student Radio logo not a corporate one. As a member of the Purple Radio Exec. I uploaded this image and as one of the effective copyright holders I fully give permission for this to be used on wikipedia. If clarification is needed you can contact us at production@purpleradio.co.uk lucuzade ( talk) 08:53, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The logo would be property of the University, which is a corporation. "The Purple Radio Promotion Team" would have to prove the release of permission for use via the WP:OTRS system. Still licensed as CC3.0, which is incorrect. Skier Dude ( talk 04:33, 9 September 2010 (UTC) reply

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Ikairport10.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is sourced to econews which has the text © کلیه حقوق مادی و معنوی برای خبرگزاری اکونیوز محفوظ است. استفاده از مطالب این سایت با ذکر منبع بلامانع است which is roughly © All material and intellectual rights for agency Akvnyvz which does not appear to give any evidence of a free licence MilborneOne ( talk) 09:37, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Mehrabadt222.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Due to the size and resolution it is unlikely to be the work of the Flikr page uploader MilborneOne ( talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Ikatransitlounge.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Due to the size and resolution it is unlikely to be the work of the Flikr page uploader MilborneOne ( talk) 09:59, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Ikaurport6.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Hidden upload text indicates that is was copied from www.chn.ir so probably not the work of the Flikr uploader MilborneOne ( talk) 10:12, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted here to attract more comments . -- ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 15:31, 6 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:French Quarter Home.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Whatever this is, I don't see how it can be claimed as self if it's a reproduction of the artist concerned's work Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 13:08, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply
• The photograph is the property of the daughter. The original was donated Allworthy's family to the Louisiana State Museum (LSM). I included that in the references. The image uploaded is a photograph that belongs to the daughter of the artist, so I thought it would be public domain. If it is not, can you please direct me to how I can make that change. The painting is at the LSM. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LoliPelu ( talk • contribs) 01:36, 9 September 2010 (UTC) reply

  It depends on the conditions with which the daughter donated it to the museum.

  • She will probably know if the museum now owns the copyright, or if they were only given permission to show it and/or it was donated into the public domain.
  • Is the daughter the executrix of her father's estate?
  • When was this work first made available to the public? This, among other works, quite likely have an expired copyright but we can't be sure without more information. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 00:15, 23 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:TIKL.gif ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Clearly Logo Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 13:41, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:THEBusiness.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Clearly promotional artwork Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:World Martial Arts and Physical Education Association Emblem.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Organisational badge - Not sure it qualifies as self.. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:02, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Welcome to Rottingdean.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a derivative work of the pictured sign, specifically the artwork on the sign. There's no freedom of panorama for two-dimensional artworks in the United Kingdom. Thus, I don't think the uploader can properly release this image into the public domain. Powers ^T 14:09, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply
• Actually, it's a three-dimensional object, not a two dimensional artwork. Therefore it can be released into PD. Mjroots ( talk) 09:45, 9 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • It's not the copyright of the sign I'm concerned about, it's the artwork on the sign, which most definitely is two-dimensional, just like a mural or a painting on a wall. Powers ^T 12:21, 9 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:JoseMiguelCarrera.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• A 1950 date for the painting is not public domain: this image has never been in the public domain in Chile. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 14:57, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Delete This image has already been deleted from Commons a short time ago, see here. It may only be uploaded back, here or there, if a good rationale is provided. The deleted image stated that it was a 1950 portrait, made by Miguel Venegas Cifuentes (1907 - 1979)

In any case, this deletion shouldn't be a problem for article making, there is a category at Commons with other images of Carrera to choose from MBelgrano ( talk) 02:35, 10 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:D.Mukhopadhyay-Audio-Album-Cover-Snap.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• apparently this is an audio album cover. Unless the uploader is a representative of the record company or whoever owns the rights to this photo, it is not free. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 15:09, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Pixel 34.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo in image makes me wonder if this can be claimed as self... Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 15:19, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:600px-LogoDownhamMarketHighSchool.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• derivative of [2]. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 15:28, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Sharden STR.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image has (C) note/watermark to eTiblisi Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 15:49, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:St.augustine.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Whatever this is, it's clearly NOT the uploaders's own work Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:With Every Breath.gif ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Promotional artwork - Not enough information to confirm it is self as uploader claims Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 17:09, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Vtsk8crew.gif ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo- More information needed to be sure this is self. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 17:14, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Spiceworks 1.5 screenshot.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Web page screenshot Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 17:53, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Silent voice.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• This looks like it's an album cover ? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 17:59, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:ParallelSideos.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• This looks like an album cover? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 18:01, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Roctumania.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like album cover artwork Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 19:42, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply
• Comment. It is the cover artwork for the album Roctumania. Both the band and album are at AfD. Cindamuse ( talk) 00:11, 9 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Trilliumacres.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Clearly Logo Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 20:10, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Carl freer 1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks properly licensed as the work of uploader User:Truthmaker1, but a previous version, File:Carl freer.jpg, also uploaded by Truthmaker1 and by now deleted for a lack of licensing, was claimed to be copyrighted by Carl Freer. In addition, an IP editor added the image to the article, also claiming to hold the copyright. I can't tell whether Carl Freer, User:Truthmaker1 and User:71.129.165.118 are one, two or three people and which of them, if anybody, holds the copyright. I've asked Truthmaker1 for comment; he hasn't yet replied. Huon ( talk) 20:14, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:MELLOLEITAO.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Description sounds like user retouched a picture that he didn't own and then claimed copyright in the retouched version. Selket ^Talk 20:37, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Canada isn't the USA and the default position as regards this class of work seems to be that the subject, and not the photographer, owns the copyrights and that a contract would be required to reverse this. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:57, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Early photgraph of CambridgeBayWeather.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Professional studio portrait with no copyright release allowing for its copy and display here. Imzadi  1979  → 20:39, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Avrillavigne tbdtour.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image of performance. Uploader is not likely copyright holder of the performance -- the same image was deleted from Commons. Selket ^Talk 21:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Avril lavignefestival.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image of concert with no fair use rationale. Selket ^Talk 21:02, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.