From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| < October 9 | October 11 > |
|---|
October 10
File:Strongman 3857773310 27181bfe91 o.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn Acather96 ( talk) 18:07, 15 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- Uploader claims that the photograph was taken circa 1920 and has applied {{ PD-US}}.However the source given by the uploader ( http://www.powerhousemuseum.com/collection/database/?irn=390335) and the Flickr description page ( http://www.flickr.com/photos/powerhouse_museum/3857773310/) both state the photo was taken in November 1936. Acather96 ( talk) 06:15, 10 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- Withdrawing nomination as a valid FUR and fair use tag has been added, and the incorrect PD-US tag has been removed. Acather96 ( talk) 18:05, 15 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Metro de Quito.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Metro de Quito.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- There is no such metro system in Quito, the photo is by necessity of a public transport system in some other city. This editor has a record of posting the details of one city's transport system as though it were that of another Kevin McE ( talk) 07:10, 10 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The posting editor has since admitted that there is no current metro system in Quito. This means that the description of the photo cannot be trusted, by his own admission, therefore te claim that he is the photgrapher is equally thrown into question.
Kevin McE (
talk)
20:18, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
reply
- He has since changed the claim that he took the photo, but left the slef-originated permission template as the permission to use. Kevin McE ( talk) 05:49, 11 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The posting editor has since admitted that there is no current metro system in Quito. This means that the description of the photo cannot be trusted, by his own admission, therefore te claim that he is the photgrapher is equally thrown into question.
Kevin McE (
talk)
20:18, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:PICT0779 - Version 2.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:PICT0779 - Version 2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative work: Photo of a modern 2D artwork. SV1XV ( talk) 09:53, 10 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:ElChapo.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:06, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:ElChapo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Identical bad quality image appears in this 2009 blog
http://www.zimbio.com/Joaquin+Guzman+Loera/articles/7/Joaquin+El+Chapo+Guzman+Loera+leads+Sinaloa so unlikely to be the work of the uploader MilborneOne ( talk) 20:17, 10 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:North vn 100 dong 1946 b.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:North vn 100 dong 1946 b.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:North vn 100 dong 1946 f.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:North vn 100 dong 1946 f.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:North vietnam dong 1946.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:North vietnam dong 1946.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Norodom I.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Norodom I.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Ngan Phieu 5M back.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Ngan Phieu 5M back.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Ngan Phieu 5M face.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Ngan Phieu 5M face.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Koyunbaba.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:06, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Koyunbaba.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:1968-AMC-Javelin-by-Karmann.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep (withdrawn). Magog the Ogre ( talk) 21:54, 26 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- first published in Germany, but not {{ PD-Germany}}. Not PD in the US bc first published in Germany (and, we must assume, not published in the US for 30 days unless the uploader states otherwise). Magog the Ogre ( talk) 21:27, 10 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The brochure in question also has an AMC Public Relations number. The photographs in it are actually from the U.S. and some are identical to those that appeared in AMC's domestic sales publications. It is written in both English and German, and AMC had numerous multilingual catalogs to promote their vehicles in various global markets. It is not clear if this was "first published in Germany". All the content in the brochure (the specifications as well as pictures of the cars, such the front cover image seen in the scan is from the U.S., not Germany) are originally from the U.S. The brochure was printed before any of the vehicles were assembled by Karmann in Germany. Domestic production and sales of Javelins was already well underway before AMC's Complete Knock Down shipments to Germany started. Therefore, I think this brochure was first published in the United States by AMC for Karmann. Just like in its foreign markets and other licensed overseas production agreements, AMC headquarters held control over the marketing of its vehicles. Moreover, I received a copy of this brochure many years ago from AMC's Public Relations Department in Detroit, Michigan, not from Karmann in Germany. I hope this information helps! CZmarlin ( talk) 03:37, 11 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| < October 9 | October 11 > |
|---|
October 10
File:Strongman 3857773310 27181bfe91 o.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn Acather96 ( talk) 18:07, 15 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- Uploader claims that the photograph was taken circa 1920 and has applied {{ PD-US}}.However the source given by the uploader ( http://www.powerhousemuseum.com/collection/database/?irn=390335) and the Flickr description page ( http://www.flickr.com/photos/powerhouse_museum/3857773310/) both state the photo was taken in November 1936. Acather96 ( talk) 06:15, 10 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- Withdrawing nomination as a valid FUR and fair use tag has been added, and the incorrect PD-US tag has been removed. Acather96 ( talk) 18:05, 15 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Metro de Quito.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Metro de Quito.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- There is no such metro system in Quito, the photo is by necessity of a public transport system in some other city. This editor has a record of posting the details of one city's transport system as though it were that of another Kevin McE ( talk) 07:10, 10 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The posting editor has since admitted that there is no current metro system in Quito. This means that the description of the photo cannot be trusted, by his own admission, therefore te claim that he is the photgrapher is equally thrown into question.
Kevin McE (
talk)
20:18, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
reply
- He has since changed the claim that he took the photo, but left the slef-originated permission template as the permission to use. Kevin McE ( talk) 05:49, 11 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The posting editor has since admitted that there is no current metro system in Quito. This means that the description of the photo cannot be trusted, by his own admission, therefore te claim that he is the photgrapher is equally thrown into question.
Kevin McE (
talk)
20:18, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:PICT0779 - Version 2.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:PICT0779 - Version 2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative work: Photo of a modern 2D artwork. SV1XV ( talk) 09:53, 10 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:ElChapo.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:06, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:ElChapo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Identical bad quality image appears in this 2009 blog
http://www.zimbio.com/Joaquin+Guzman+Loera/articles/7/Joaquin+El+Chapo+Guzman+Loera+leads+Sinaloa so unlikely to be the work of the uploader MilborneOne ( talk) 20:17, 10 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:North vn 100 dong 1946 b.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:North vn 100 dong 1946 b.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:North vn 100 dong 1946 f.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:North vn 100 dong 1946 f.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:North vietnam dong 1946.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:North vietnam dong 1946.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Norodom I.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Norodom I.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Ngan Phieu 5M back.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Ngan Phieu 5M back.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Ngan Phieu 5M face.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Ngan Phieu 5M face.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Koyunbaba.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:06, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Koyunbaba.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:1968-AMC-Javelin-by-Karmann.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep (withdrawn). Magog the Ogre ( talk) 21:54, 26 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- first published in Germany, but not {{ PD-Germany}}. Not PD in the US bc first published in Germany (and, we must assume, not published in the US for 30 days unless the uploader states otherwise). Magog the Ogre ( talk) 21:27, 10 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The brochure in question also has an AMC Public Relations number. The photographs in it are actually from the U.S. and some are identical to those that appeared in AMC's domestic sales publications. It is written in both English and German, and AMC had numerous multilingual catalogs to promote their vehicles in various global markets. It is not clear if this was "first published in Germany". All the content in the brochure (the specifications as well as pictures of the cars, such the front cover image seen in the scan is from the U.S., not Germany) are originally from the U.S. The brochure was printed before any of the vehicles were assembled by Karmann in Germany. Domestic production and sales of Javelins was already well underway before AMC's Complete Knock Down shipments to Germany started. Therefore, I think this brochure was first published in the United States by AMC for Karmann. Just like in its foreign markets and other licensed overseas production agreements, AMC headquarters held control over the marketing of its vehicles. Moreover, I received a copy of this brochure many years ago from AMC's Public Relations Department in Detroit, Michigan, not from Karmann in Germany. I hope this information helps! CZmarlin ( talk) 03:37, 11 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.