The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:19, 7 June 2010 (UTC) reply

File:TheBoilermaker-Statue.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Sculpture - Recent - FoP applicable? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 19:29, 24 May 2010 (UTC) reply

• Delete: Clearly a derivative image of a post-1978 copyright statue protected by US Freedom of Panorama law per commons:COM:FOP#United States. One image might be used under WP:NFCC to identify the statue in its own article. ww2censor ( talk) 12:38, 28 May 2010 (UTC) reply
• Clearly non-free per Ww2censor - I think this one should be kept with a FUR for its article rather than File:TheBoilermaker-Baker90-2008.jpg though. VernoWhitney ( talk) 00:57, 5 June 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:19, 7 June 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Bundabergrailwaystation.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• The uploader has stated that the images haven't been released under the license given on the description page: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk%3AMCAspire&action=historysubmit&diff=363876400&oldid=363729843 Theleftorium ^(talk) 20:42, 24 May 2010 (UTC) reply
• Delete: Uploader just assumed a CC could apply, despite the lack of a CC license on the source web site. — RP88 ^{( talk)} 13:46, 3 June 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:19, 7 June 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Howard-rail-station.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• The uploader has stated that the images haven't been released under the license given on the description page: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk%3AMCAspire&action=historysubmit&diff=363876400&oldid=363729843 Theleftorium ^(talk) 20:43, 24 May 2010 (UTC) reply
• Delete: Uploader just assumed a CC could apply, despite the lack of a CC license on the source web site. — RP88 ^{( talk)} 13:45, 3 June 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:19, 7 June 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Sxsw08 plush.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Needs verification that uploader is the actual copyright holder. Eeekster ( talk) 23:36, 24 May 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.