From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
March 8
File:File name.ext
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the
listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "Image_name.ext" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after "reason=". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at
WT:PUF or at my talk page.
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
reply
- File:File name.ext ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader claims he is author; actual authorship rests with University of Michigan-Flint · rodii · 01:27, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Pailroadsij.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Pailroadsij.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader has a history of uploading copyright violations. I have zero confidence that the uploader owns the copyright to this file. — ξ xplicit 01:29, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
KeepDelete Ok, the guy is currently blocked for uploading copyrighted images. It doesn't mean that all his images are bad. Tineye can't seem to find any matches and I'm not willing to simply get rid of it because you have a feeling, but without concrete evidence to back those suspicions up. — BQZip01 — talk 04:43, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply- Per
WP:COPYVIO#Dealing with copyright violations, If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of their major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately. The user who uploaded this image is on his second block for creating copyright violations, so I wouldn't take the off chance to assume the image might be his, unless proven otherwise. —
ξ
xplicit
04:48, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
reply
- ...or your could just find
the source of the image. This appears to be from a government site. FOP applies in Colombia, but I'm not sure if government works are PD there. Anyone have any insight?
— BQZip01 —
talk
05:01, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Well, the picture is found
here, which states "All Rights Reserved to the Bogotá City Hall". Seems like a straight out copyright violation now. —
ξ
xplicit
05:18, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Yep. Completely replaceable and copyrighted=C-YA! — BQZip01 — talk 07:58, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Well, the picture is found
here, which states "All Rights Reserved to the Bogotá City Hall". Seems like a straight out copyright violation now. —
ξ
xplicit
05:18, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
reply
- ...or your could just find
the source of the image. This appears to be from a government site. FOP applies in Colombia, but I'm not sure if government works are PD there. Anyone have any insight?
— BQZip01 —
talk
05:01, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Per
WP:COPYVIO#Dealing with copyright violations, If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of their major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately. The user who uploaded this image is on his second block for creating copyright violations, so I wouldn't take the off chance to assume the image might be his, unless proven otherwise. —
ξ
xplicit
04:48, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Please see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 11 for a broader discussion of Jumamuba's uploads. PleaseStand (talk) 02:08, 11 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Gimenezdeqj.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Gimenezdeqj.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Clearly not the work of the uploader. No source, making one unable to fix the licensing. — ξ xplicit 01:33, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Keep Source: [1]; shows a creation date of 1892. — BQZip01 — talk 04:40, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Please see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 11 for a broader discussion of Jumamuba's uploads. PleaseStand (talk) 02:09, 11 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Pedro León Zapata.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:38, 17 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Pedro León Zapata.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Delete. Not used for commentary on the station or the program from which the image is taken. Used instead for commentary on an individual, so it should be replaceable by free content. -- Gnowor T C 22:04, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:11, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Delete copyrighted image of living person. — BQZip01 — talk 23:56, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Per above notice, moving this to Non-free content review. Feel free to close this discussion.-- Gnowor T C 07:09, 9 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:NEW Shiawassee River Map.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:11, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:NEW Shiawassee River Map.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Delete. Although it appears to be a photograph (which is how the uploader may be claiming to have authorship claim in order to release it to public domain), ultimately, it's a photograph of a map (itself a copyrighted work). Don't see any release of the copyright regarding the maps authorship. Additionally, this could be created separately in order to have a free alternative. --
Gnowor
T
C
22:15, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Additionally, I believe that this is the file that erroneous nomination earlier was referring to.-- Gnowor T C 22:19, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Oliver Platt headshot 8-08.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Oliver Platt headshot 8-08.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Promotional photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 23:44, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Delete Unless OTRS verifies. — BQZip01 — talk 23:58, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Art headshot 02 gs copy.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Art headshot 02 gs copy.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Promotional photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 23:46, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Delete Unless OTRS verifies. — BQZip01 — talk 23:59, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Sikhsoldiersandkida.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Sikhsoldiersandkida.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Historical Photo of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 23:54, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Sikhbritishpic.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Sikhbritishpic.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Historical Photo of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 23:54, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Found a duplicate at [2]. I'm still looking for the actual hosting flickr acct page. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 00:16, 9 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
![[2]](http://farm1.static.flickr.com/30/42917302_24ae0a07ff.jpg){kind=link}
File:France marchofsikhs.JPG
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:France marchofsikhs.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Historical Photo of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 23:55, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:RanjitSingh closeup head2.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:RanjitSingh closeup head2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- 2-D painting of some sort. Possibly copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 23:55, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Sikhsofthejj.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Sikhsofthejj.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Cropped version of File:Jathaofsikhs.jpg. Obviously copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 23:56, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Jathaofsikhs.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Jathaofsikhs.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Judging by logo at bottom of the page, obviously copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 23:56, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Nihangs Prep Bhangi.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Nihangs Prep Bhangi.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Judging by logo, obviously copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 23:57, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
March 8
File:File name.ext
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the
listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "Image_name.ext" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after "reason=". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at
WT:PUF or at my talk page.
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
reply
- File:File name.ext ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader claims he is author; actual authorship rests with University of Michigan-Flint · rodii · 01:27, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Pailroadsij.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Pailroadsij.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader has a history of uploading copyright violations. I have zero confidence that the uploader owns the copyright to this file. — ξ xplicit 01:29, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
KeepDelete Ok, the guy is currently blocked for uploading copyrighted images. It doesn't mean that all his images are bad. Tineye can't seem to find any matches and I'm not willing to simply get rid of it because you have a feeling, but without concrete evidence to back those suspicions up. — BQZip01 — talk 04:43, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply- Per
WP:COPYVIO#Dealing with copyright violations, If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of their major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately. The user who uploaded this image is on his second block for creating copyright violations, so I wouldn't take the off chance to assume the image might be his, unless proven otherwise. —
ξ
xplicit
04:48, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
reply
- ...or your could just find
the source of the image. This appears to be from a government site. FOP applies in Colombia, but I'm not sure if government works are PD there. Anyone have any insight?
— BQZip01 —
talk
05:01, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Well, the picture is found
here, which states "All Rights Reserved to the Bogotá City Hall". Seems like a straight out copyright violation now. —
ξ
xplicit
05:18, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Yep. Completely replaceable and copyrighted=C-YA! — BQZip01 — talk 07:58, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Well, the picture is found
here, which states "All Rights Reserved to the Bogotá City Hall". Seems like a straight out copyright violation now. —
ξ
xplicit
05:18, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
reply
- ...or your could just find
the source of the image. This appears to be from a government site. FOP applies in Colombia, but I'm not sure if government works are PD there. Anyone have any insight?
— BQZip01 —
talk
05:01, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Per
WP:COPYVIO#Dealing with copyright violations, If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of their major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately. The user who uploaded this image is on his second block for creating copyright violations, so I wouldn't take the off chance to assume the image might be his, unless proven otherwise. —
ξ
xplicit
04:48, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Please see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 11 for a broader discussion of Jumamuba's uploads. PleaseStand (talk) 02:08, 11 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Gimenezdeqj.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Gimenezdeqj.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Clearly not the work of the uploader. No source, making one unable to fix the licensing. — ξ xplicit 01:33, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Keep Source: [1]; shows a creation date of 1892. — BQZip01 — talk 04:40, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Please see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 11 for a broader discussion of Jumamuba's uploads. PleaseStand (talk) 02:09, 11 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Pedro León Zapata.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:38, 17 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Pedro León Zapata.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Delete. Not used for commentary on the station or the program from which the image is taken. Used instead for commentary on an individual, so it should be replaceable by free content. -- Gnowor T C 22:04, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:11, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Delete copyrighted image of living person. — BQZip01 — talk 23:56, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Per above notice, moving this to Non-free content review. Feel free to close this discussion.-- Gnowor T C 07:09, 9 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:NEW Shiawassee River Map.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:11, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:NEW Shiawassee River Map.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Delete. Although it appears to be a photograph (which is how the uploader may be claiming to have authorship claim in order to release it to public domain), ultimately, it's a photograph of a map (itself a copyrighted work). Don't see any release of the copyright regarding the maps authorship. Additionally, this could be created separately in order to have a free alternative. --
Gnowor
T
C
22:15, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Additionally, I believe that this is the file that erroneous nomination earlier was referring to.-- Gnowor T C 22:19, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Oliver Platt headshot 8-08.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Oliver Platt headshot 8-08.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Promotional photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 23:44, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Delete Unless OTRS verifies. — BQZip01 — talk 23:58, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Art headshot 02 gs copy.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Art headshot 02 gs copy.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Promotional photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 23:46, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Delete Unless OTRS verifies. — BQZip01 — talk 23:59, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Sikhsoldiersandkida.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Sikhsoldiersandkida.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Historical Photo of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 23:54, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Sikhbritishpic.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Sikhbritishpic.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Historical Photo of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 23:54, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Found a duplicate at [2]. I'm still looking for the actual hosting flickr acct page. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 00:16, 9 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:France marchofsikhs.JPG
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:France marchofsikhs.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Historical Photo of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 23:55, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:RanjitSingh closeup head2.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:RanjitSingh closeup head2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- 2-D painting of some sort. Possibly copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 23:55, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Sikhsofthejj.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Sikhsofthejj.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Cropped version of File:Jathaofsikhs.jpg. Obviously copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 23:56, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Jathaofsikhs.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Jathaofsikhs.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Judging by logo at bottom of the page, obviously copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 23:56, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Nihangs Prep Bhangi.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Nihangs Prep Bhangi.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Judging by logo, obviously copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 23:57, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.