- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Floating Squares.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Promotional image of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 01:33, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
I took this photograph myself, for promotional purposes, yes: To sell ten of these shirts on Ebay. The "woman" pictured is a mannequin. I've licensed the photo's use under CC 2.0. Thank you for pointing out that I had not added the permissions line to the file info.-- AiNewsDesk ( talk) 23:01, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Speedy Delete We are not a marketing tool or image host. — BQZip01 — talk 02:42, 24 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Delete It talks about ebay in the description-- Effingcrazy ( talk) 06:40, 28 March 2010 (UTC)Effingcrazy reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete for lacking evidence of permission. — ξ xplicit 23:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Craig A. Kraft.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Studio style photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 02:53, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Just because this is a "studio style" photo doesn't mean that it's not a snapshot taken against a brick wall. I worked on a research project in which I compiled a number of photos and files, and I have been given full permission to use all of the images I found by the artist's studio and the artist himself. If I'm incorrectly listing them, please explain to me how they should be listed. Thanks.
Jltemkin (
talk)
13:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)JLTemkin
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete for lacking evidence of permission. — ξ xplicit 23:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC) reply
- 3-D artwork of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 02:53, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
I worked on a research project in which I compiled a number of photos and files, and I have been given full permission to use all of the images I found by the artist's studio and the artist himself. If I'm incorrectly listing them, please explain to me how they should be listed. Thanks.
Jltemkin (
talk)
13:26, 23 March 2010 (UTC)JLTemkin
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete for lacking evidence of permission. — ξ xplicit 23:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Lightweb by Craig A. Kraft.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- 3-D artwork of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 02:53, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
I worked on a research project in which I compiled a number of photos and files, and I have been given full permission to use all of the images I found by the artist's studio and the artist himself. If I'm incorrectly listing them, please explain to me how they should be listed. Thanks. Jltemkin ( talk) 13:26, 23 March 2010 (UTC)JLTemkin reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete for lacking evidence of permission. — ξ xplicit 23:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC) reply
- 3-D artwork of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 02:54, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
I worked on a research project in which I compiled a number of photos and files, and I have been given full permission to use all of the images I found by the artist's studio and the artist himself. If I'm incorrectly listing them, please explain to me how they should be listed. Thanks. Jltemkin ( talk) 13:27, 23 March 2010 (UTC)JLTemkin reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete for lacking evidence of permission. — ξ xplicit 23:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC) reply
- 3-D artwork of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 02:54, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
I worked on a research project in which I compiled a number of photos and files, and I have been given full permission to use all of the images I found by the artist's studio and the artist himself. If I'm incorrectly listing them, please explain to me how they should be listed. Thanks. Jltemkin ( talk) 13:26, 23 March 2010 (UTC)JLTemkin reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete for lacking evidence of permission. — ξ xplicit 23:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC) reply
- 3-D artwork of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 02:54, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
I worked on a research project in which I compiled a number of photos and files, and I have been given full permission to use all of the images I found by the artist's studio and the artist himself. If I'm incorrectly listing them, please explain to me how they should be listed. Thanks. Jltemkin ( talk) 13:27, 23 March 2010 (UTC)JLTemkin reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Mora from space.svg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Satellite Screenshot of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 02:59, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Delete I doubt uploader owns his own satellite.-- Effingcrazy ( talk) 06:42, 28 March 2010 (UTC)Effingcrazy reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Alas, not covered by restrictive US Freedom of Panorama. There might be a non-free rationale to be written, but not by me.
Angus McLellan
(Talk)
23:17, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
reply
- File:AngelinaEberlyStatue.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- This statue was created by Pat Oliphant [1], who is still alive. The statue is therefore under copyright protection, and since there is no freedom of panorama in the U.S., this image is a derivative work of a copyrighted artwork and so cannot be licensed freely under CC-BY-SA. + An gr 10:13, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Not a US Government work, so not free. Deleted as surely replaceable. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:12, 11 April 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Battle-of-lake-borgne.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image from 1993 book written by private citizen, published by a non-governmental publisher, and with a copyright notice. Why is this tagged as a public domain work of the U.S. Federal Government? Infrogmation ( talk) 12:02, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Elven Armor Neiman Marcus.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is a work of 'artistic craftmanship' on display in the US, This should be tagged as 'fair-use' surely?
Sfan00 IMG (
talk)
13:57, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
reply
- It's a costume piece from a movie. Are we suggesting that any properly-licensed photograph of a costume from a movie should be only available under fair use? - PKM ( talk) 02:21, 23 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 5 April 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Pm Girija Prasad Koirala.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- This file was uploaded by User:Janax 3rd, a user with only three edits, all in 2007, another of which was to place this now dead link in the main body of the Girija Prasad Koirala article - it may well have been the same image as is present here. Incidentally, this same image is present many times across the web, for example here, here and here, which suggests it may be a general photo from somewhere. Unless the uploader can produce evidence that he/she is really the copyright owner, I don't think we can be confident that is the case. SteveRwanda ( talk) 20:19, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Raw Dog.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder. My requests for further information were ignored. Woogee ( talk) 23:46, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Delete No one really knows what this is from.-- Effingcrazy ( talk) 06:42, 28 March 2010 (UTC)Effingcrazy reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Floating Squares.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Promotional image of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 01:33, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
I took this photograph myself, for promotional purposes, yes: To sell ten of these shirts on Ebay. The "woman" pictured is a mannequin. I've licensed the photo's use under CC 2.0. Thank you for pointing out that I had not added the permissions line to the file info.-- AiNewsDesk ( talk) 23:01, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Speedy Delete We are not a marketing tool or image host. — BQZip01 — talk 02:42, 24 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Delete It talks about ebay in the description-- Effingcrazy ( talk) 06:40, 28 March 2010 (UTC)Effingcrazy reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete for lacking evidence of permission. — ξ xplicit 23:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Craig A. Kraft.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Studio style photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 02:53, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Just because this is a "studio style" photo doesn't mean that it's not a snapshot taken against a brick wall. I worked on a research project in which I compiled a number of photos and files, and I have been given full permission to use all of the images I found by the artist's studio and the artist himself. If I'm incorrectly listing them, please explain to me how they should be listed. Thanks.
Jltemkin (
talk)
13:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)JLTemkin
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete for lacking evidence of permission. — ξ xplicit 23:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC) reply
- 3-D artwork of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 02:53, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
I worked on a research project in which I compiled a number of photos and files, and I have been given full permission to use all of the images I found by the artist's studio and the artist himself. If I'm incorrectly listing them, please explain to me how they should be listed. Thanks.
Jltemkin (
talk)
13:26, 23 March 2010 (UTC)JLTemkin
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete for lacking evidence of permission. — ξ xplicit 23:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Lightweb by Craig A. Kraft.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- 3-D artwork of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 02:53, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
I worked on a research project in which I compiled a number of photos and files, and I have been given full permission to use all of the images I found by the artist's studio and the artist himself. If I'm incorrectly listing them, please explain to me how they should be listed. Thanks. Jltemkin ( talk) 13:26, 23 March 2010 (UTC)JLTemkin reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete for lacking evidence of permission. — ξ xplicit 23:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC) reply
- 3-D artwork of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 02:54, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
I worked on a research project in which I compiled a number of photos and files, and I have been given full permission to use all of the images I found by the artist's studio and the artist himself. If I'm incorrectly listing them, please explain to me how they should be listed. Thanks. Jltemkin ( talk) 13:27, 23 March 2010 (UTC)JLTemkin reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete for lacking evidence of permission. — ξ xplicit 23:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC) reply
- 3-D artwork of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 02:54, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
I worked on a research project in which I compiled a number of photos and files, and I have been given full permission to use all of the images I found by the artist's studio and the artist himself. If I'm incorrectly listing them, please explain to me how they should be listed. Thanks. Jltemkin ( talk) 13:26, 23 March 2010 (UTC)JLTemkin reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete for lacking evidence of permission. — ξ xplicit 23:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC) reply
- 3-D artwork of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 02:54, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
I worked on a research project in which I compiled a number of photos and files, and I have been given full permission to use all of the images I found by the artist's studio and the artist himself. If I'm incorrectly listing them, please explain to me how they should be listed. Thanks. Jltemkin ( talk) 13:27, 23 March 2010 (UTC)JLTemkin reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Mora from space.svg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Satellite Screenshot of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock (TALK) 02:59, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Delete I doubt uploader owns his own satellite.-- Effingcrazy ( talk) 06:42, 28 March 2010 (UTC)Effingcrazy reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Alas, not covered by restrictive US Freedom of Panorama. There might be a non-free rationale to be written, but not by me.
Angus McLellan
(Talk)
23:17, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
reply
- File:AngelinaEberlyStatue.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- This statue was created by Pat Oliphant [1], who is still alive. The statue is therefore under copyright protection, and since there is no freedom of panorama in the U.S., this image is a derivative work of a copyrighted artwork and so cannot be licensed freely under CC-BY-SA. + An gr 10:13, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Not a US Government work, so not free. Deleted as surely replaceable. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:12, 11 April 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Battle-of-lake-borgne.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image from 1993 book written by private citizen, published by a non-governmental publisher, and with a copyright notice. Why is this tagged as a public domain work of the U.S. Federal Government? Infrogmation ( talk) 12:02, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Elven Armor Neiman Marcus.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is a work of 'artistic craftmanship' on display in the US, This should be tagged as 'fair-use' surely?
Sfan00 IMG (
talk)
13:57, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
reply
- It's a costume piece from a movie. Are we suggesting that any properly-licensed photograph of a costume from a movie should be only available under fair use? - PKM ( talk) 02:21, 23 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 5 April 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Pm Girija Prasad Koirala.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- This file was uploaded by User:Janax 3rd, a user with only three edits, all in 2007, another of which was to place this now dead link in the main body of the Girija Prasad Koirala article - it may well have been the same image as is present here. Incidentally, this same image is present many times across the web, for example here, here and here, which suggests it may be a general photo from somewhere. Unless the uploader can produce evidence that he/she is really the copyright owner, I don't think we can be confident that is the case. SteveRwanda ( talk) 20:19, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Raw Dog.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder. My requests for further information were ignored. Woogee ( talk) 23:46, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply
- Delete No one really knows what this is from.-- Effingcrazy ( talk) 06:42, 28 March 2010 (UTC)Effingcrazy reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.