From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
June 29
File:Voltas bldg.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:06, 4 July 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Voltas bldg.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Summary says image is "from a newspaper (telegraph)" and only for educational use. Original non-free license tag was changed to claim of cc-by after being flagged as replaceable fair use. dave pape ( talk) 03:01, 29 June 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Müller header Mexico 1970.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 13 July 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Müller header Mexico 1970.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Clearly says " This image is for non-commercial or educational use only". Mosmof ( talk) 04:21, 29 June 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Dr Pemberton.JPG
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:08, 8 July 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Dr Pemberton.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Delete: images of modern US sculpture are not covered by freedom of panorama per commons:COM:FOP, so uploader's PD tag does not apply because the sculpture copyright is still owned by the artist so this is a derivative work. ww2censor ( talk) 04:27, 29 June 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:481.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 13 July 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:481.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image is of B. R. Ambedkar but the licensing is very odd. There are plenty of better sourced images from Commons, so I don't think there's much value to keeping this. Ricky81682 ( talk) 06:47, 29 June 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Mathew Horne.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 13 July 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Mathew Horne.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- this image appears to be a photo of an actor appearing in front of a large promotional image of the actor. Is there an issue with the inclusion of that promotional poster? Active Banana ( talk) 17:27, 29 June 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Haypm784.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 13 July 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Haypm784.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- I'm marking this for deletion, but I'm not entirely sure about it. Although Dem467 ( talk · contribs) has marked this as being their own work, it appears to be the exact same image as the one used on http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/crossfade/2010/03/paramore_tegan_and_sara_bayfront_park.php. At the very least, there are other instances of it being used on the Internet before its upload date, so I think its licensing tag is incorrect. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 17:40, 29 June 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Josh+Farro+Josh+live.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 13 July 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Josh+Farro+Josh+live.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Seems to be the same image as http://cn.last.fm/music/Josh+Farro/+images/7314497 (from 2+ years ago), and possibly not "own work" as it is marked. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 17:43, 29 June 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Miyamoto.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:19, 13 July 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Miyamoto.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be a screenshot of some sort, no indication that the uploader owns the copyright. — ξ xplicit 22:21, 29 June 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
June 29
File:Voltas bldg.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:06, 4 July 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Voltas bldg.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Summary says image is "from a newspaper (telegraph)" and only for educational use. Original non-free license tag was changed to claim of cc-by after being flagged as replaceable fair use. dave pape ( talk) 03:01, 29 June 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Müller header Mexico 1970.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 13 July 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Müller header Mexico 1970.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Clearly says " This image is for non-commercial or educational use only". Mosmof ( talk) 04:21, 29 June 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Dr Pemberton.JPG
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:08, 8 July 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Dr Pemberton.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Delete: images of modern US sculpture are not covered by freedom of panorama per commons:COM:FOP, so uploader's PD tag does not apply because the sculpture copyright is still owned by the artist so this is a derivative work. ww2censor ( talk) 04:27, 29 June 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:481.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 13 July 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:481.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image is of B. R. Ambedkar but the licensing is very odd. There are plenty of better sourced images from Commons, so I don't think there's much value to keeping this. Ricky81682 ( talk) 06:47, 29 June 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Mathew Horne.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 13 July 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Mathew Horne.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- this image appears to be a photo of an actor appearing in front of a large promotional image of the actor. Is there an issue with the inclusion of that promotional poster? Active Banana ( talk) 17:27, 29 June 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Haypm784.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 13 July 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Haypm784.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- I'm marking this for deletion, but I'm not entirely sure about it. Although Dem467 ( talk · contribs) has marked this as being their own work, it appears to be the exact same image as the one used on http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/crossfade/2010/03/paramore_tegan_and_sara_bayfront_park.php. At the very least, there are other instances of it being used on the Internet before its upload date, so I think its licensing tag is incorrect. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 17:40, 29 June 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Josh+Farro+Josh+live.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 13 July 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Josh+Farro+Josh+live.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Seems to be the same image as http://cn.last.fm/music/Josh+Farro/+images/7314497 (from 2+ years ago), and possibly not "own work" as it is marked. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 17:43, 29 June 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Miyamoto.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:19, 13 July 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Miyamoto.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be a screenshot of some sort, no indication that the uploader owns the copyright. — ξ xplicit 22:21, 29 June 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.