The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:0.25 EGP reverse.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Currency - Do Egypt relase notes as PD? Not self in any event Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 01:33, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Aa 5000BC spring midnight.gif ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source program not stated- so impossible to know if 'free' screenshot Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 01:37, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply
• I made this map using an astronomical sky-map-making Windows application called Skymap http://www.skymap.com/ . Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 07:26, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply
• Per http://www.skymap.com/skymap_pro_faq.htm Screenshots from it can only be used for non-commercial purposes, making them non-free for Wikipedia. There is other skymapping software which allow imagery use without such a restriction. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:07, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply
• Which other skymapping software? Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 12:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Start here Category:Free_astronomy_software - BTW Assuming it's imagery is usable Stellarium looks interesting... Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 15:03, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:13, 4 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:The Gekko White Collar.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be cropped from a promotional photo of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 02:32, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply
• Used for promotion here. Racconish ^Tk 06:52, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: File does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:39, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Gallifreyrises.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Replaced with a lower-resolution JPEG (GallifreyReturns.jpg) Dsalt ( talk) 03:21, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:AdataDRAM.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Promotional image of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder Skier Dude ( talk) 04:15, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

• including File:AdataFlash.JPG - File:AdataMemory.JPG - File:AdataDPF.JPG - File:AdataSSD.JPG - File:AdataExpressCard.JPG Skier Dude ( talk) 04:19, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Ja-themirror.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Album cover, no indication that the uploader owns the copyright to this image. No source to verify that this was the "original" cover. — ξ ^xplicit 04:40, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Ja-themirrorrealoaded.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Album cover, no indication that the uploader owns the copyright to this image. No source to verify that this was the actual cover. — ξ ^xplicit 04:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Picolontheateffffddrj.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Satellite image - no source given (possible google maps image?); without source unable to determine if it is PD or not Skier Dude ( talk) 07:04, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep for Now; OTRS permission sent. - FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:45, 4 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Glider Cockpit.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Restriction on image description page states "for free use within Wikipedia was granted" - that restriction "within" may be too restrictive under cc license. Should have WP:OTRS to clarify. Skier Dude ( talk) 07:18, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Would you explain in plain English what you want to happen next to allow this image to be used? JMcC ( talk) 14:35, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply
  • This restriction appears to say that it can be used only within wikipedia, which is contrary to the basic CC license, that it can be used in some manner outside of wikipedia. The restriction should be removed to clarify that it truly is CC3.0. Also, since the uploader is not the photographer, proof of the release into a CC license should be obtained by going through the WP:OTRS confirmation system. Skier Dude ( talk) 19:28, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply
    • The link that you give is to an article about the Wikipedia:Volunteer response team called WP:OTRS. Nice to know that these people exist but I simply asked what I should do next. The link does not answer this request. The "Contact us" link in this article gives the general query page. I would have to spend ages researching something that should be answered in a few seconds. I merely would like the wording of the permission that I can ask the photographer to send. He is happy for the photograph to be used in any way at all. I would also like the address to whom he should be send this permission. Sadly Wikipedia seems to make these things as obscure as possible. JMcC ( talk) 18:33, 19 January 2010 (UTC) reply
      • Short version, your photographer friend needs to contact OTRS and verify that he indeed releases it under a free license (or compatible license). If you need additional assistance, please contact me on my talk page. — BQZip01 —  ^talk 00:24, 27 January 2010 (UTC) reply
• New licence sent to OTRS. Please clarify subsequent requests. JMcC ( talk) 08:38, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:CLGC Logo (Large).jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Corporate/group logo; states "members of the council" created it, therefore the uploader is probably not the (c) holder. Skier Dude ( talk) 07:19, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:13, 4 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Catalan People.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unsourced Derivative Work. May contain copyrighted images. If so, unlikely uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 07:23, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:13, 4 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:ToyKitchenSet.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Promotional image of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 07:25, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by ESkog ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:46, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

File:EmanuelVilla.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• No metadata; on-field shot; colorized, possibly to bypass tineye or image searches? Skier Dude ( talk) 07:55, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply
• Right you are. Here's the original from Reuters: [1]. I've speedy deleted. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 14:47, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:SantiagoSolariAtlante.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• No metadata; on-field shot; colorized, possibly to bypass tineye or image searches? Skier Dude ( talk) 07:55, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; this is free software. - FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:51, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Simplis.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• IS this free or unfree IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 13:05, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply
• Open source, free software released by GNU GPL. Hence, it should be free. Pmlineditor  ∞ 14:36, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Why does it have a fair use rational?-- IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 18:00, 23 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; this is a screenshot of free software. - FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:47, 4 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Slampp-2.0-desktop.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• is this free or unfree? IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 13:06, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply
• Keep; screenshot of free software. See licensing terms. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 14:45, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Why does it have a fair use rational?-- IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 18:00, 23 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Sofa statistics screenshot.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• is this free or unfree? IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 13:06, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; this is free software. - FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:49, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Songbird 1.4.3 Ubuntu 9.10.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• is this free or unfree IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 13:06, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Visifire.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Is this free or unfree IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 13:07, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:13, 4 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Wikipedia In Mozilla Prisim In Windows 7.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Is this free or not??? IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 13:40, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply
• Kinda Iffy - Mozilla Prizim is is licensed under GNU/GPL it is a free program, however the windows 7 Areo interface is copyrighted it would be better if we cloud get this screen-shot from Linux but i don't use Linux because it gets in the way of my work, So do you men the to ask weather the application's screen-shot free, or the window, of course the Wikipedia home-screen is free! Koman90, A+ ( talk) 14:42, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Allow me to clarify Mozilla prism is a Mozilla application similar to a browser, however it has a reduced interface for the application to be only a window with the website in it for sites that already have tier own interface, Wikipedia for instance. Thus the Sreenshot of the application is free, however the windows 7 areo interface is trademarked to microsoft, this rely should be re-done in linux.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Wikipedia main page01.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Is this free or not IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 13:40, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; the file is tagged as non-free. - FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:47, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Wikipedia screenshot.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Is this free or not? IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 13:42, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Sausalito1974.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• No FOP for artworks in US ? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:58, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Stockholm cellurl.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Could be self created, but it looks suspicously like a Google or MSN arieal to me... Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 17:58, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Oakland2.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Possibly Google Maps... Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 18:15, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Manon masse.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a pollitcal poster - I am skeptical about a self claim Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 22:34, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.