The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; concern addressed. - FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:54, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Irschenberg Wappen.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• COA, Only source given is author... Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 01:47, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply
• This may be the original source. Images on that site are allowed to be used on Wikipedia with attribution. Thparkth ( talk) 01:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

• Uploader gave corrected source - could be a close if the source checks out :) Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 20:12, 16 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; concern addressed. - FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:54, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Tute deck twoplayergame.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Permission says Wikipedia-only , despite the license being GFDL Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 01:51, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

• Permission now for all uses and image design copyrights added.-- Gduwen ( talk) 19:36, 16 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; concern addressed. - FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:54, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:TuteFourKings.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Permission states Wikipedia-only Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 01:53, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply
• Permission now for all uses and image design copyrights added.-- Gduwen ( talk) 19:36, 16 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; concern addressed. - FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:54, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Tute 40inbastos play.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Permission states wikipedia only Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 01:55, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply
• Permission now for all uses and image design copyrights added.-- Gduwen ( talk) 19:36, 16 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; concern addressed. - FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:54, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Tute 20inespadas play.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Permission states Wikipedia-only Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 01:56, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply
• Permission now for all uses and image design copyrights added.-- Gduwen ( talk) 19:36, 16 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; concern addressed. - FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:55, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Player of Tute holding cards.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Pemission states Wikipedia only Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 01:58, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply
• Permission now for all uses and image design copyrights added.-- Gduwen ( talk) 19:36, 16 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

File:MaxwellStudio.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• This image is the screenshot of non-free software Tân ( talk) 02:28, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Nab icon.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Description says it is a screenshot, but not of what. No seeming use, likely copyrighted. NativeForeigner ^Talk/ _Contribs 04:26, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

File:HallMIRRORS.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is watermarked with a site that appears to no longer exist. Unclear that uploader is copyright holder. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 04:45, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Barry ryan.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Low-resolution field-level shot with Photoshop as the only metadata. That all adds up to another sports image which is almost certainly taken from some professional source. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 04:51, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Gareth gorman.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Low-resolution athlete image with no camera metadata. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 04:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

File:SeanConnor.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Low-resolution athlete image with no camera metadata. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 04:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Sean Connor 1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Low-resolution athlete image with no camera metadata. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 04:55, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Sean Connor.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Low-resolution athlete image with no camera metadata. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 04:55, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Alternc.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• What is the license of this file coes the link is dead and i don't speak french IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 05:47, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; the file is tagged as non-free. - FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:25, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Flowing destination.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Credited to artist Michael Sturdy but licensed as PD-self; doubtful uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 07:44, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:33, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; the file is tagged as non-free. - FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:28, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

File:FK Dinamo Tirana logo.gif ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• source [1] shows (c) - no indication has been released into PD Skier Dude ( talk) 08:02, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:33, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Kjawad.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• no source; watermark makes it appear it is a screenshot of some sort Skier Dude ( talk) 08:22, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

File:PVPingili Ranga RaoSADASHIVA RAO.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• appears to be scan of older newspaper or similar; no source to verify correct (c) status Skier Dude ( talk) 08:26, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Wuwf187.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• corporate logo; no source or metadata; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude ( talk) 08:36, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Wuwf logo09.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• corporate logo; no source or metadata; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude ( talk) 08:38, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Promotional picture 2009.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• claims to be a sony promotional picture & licensed as PD-self - obvious conflict of claims Skier Dude ( talk) 08:42, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:33, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

File:ET Communicator Cropped.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a screenshot from a film, currently isted as CC-BY-SA 3.0. Say no more. Totnesmartin ( talk) 12:43, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Huh, you try to help round here and a fucking bot cuts you off. Do it your bloody selves next time. Totnesmartin ( talk) 14:55, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

File:K1A1 Main Battle Tank.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• ROK government material which is automatically PD seems to be limited to official acts and similar, and doesn't seem to extend to photographs and similar release by the military. Not obviously in the public domain and no possible rationale for non-free use when this tank is in large-scale service with the ROK military. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:18, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

File:K9 Thunder SPH.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader has added a PD license but source is said to be Samsung. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:19, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

File:K10 resupplying demonstration.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader has added a PD license but source is said to be Samsung. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:20, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Boris galchev.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Low-resolution athlete photo with no metadata. I can't find the original source but doubt this is user-created. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 21:50, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Getty Garden.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• During a query about moving this to commons, given the location and dates it was suggested that FoP might not apply. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 23:21, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

• Delete, the waterfall is a sculpture, and United States freedom of panorama does not allow for photography of artistic works. See Getty Center#Central Garden for relevant construction dates. – blurpeace  ^(talk) 23:23, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

• Hmm...how does this rule apply to the waterfall in my photo and not to the statues in all of these? DRosenbach ^{( Talk | Contribs)} 23:42, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

• Those have all fallen into the public domain one way or the other. BTW, your signature is occupying four lines. Mind shortening it? – blurpeace  ^(talk) 00:18, 15 January 2010 (UTC) reply

OK -- thanx for the info. And it must be your computer, because it's not occupying four lines on my screen. DRosenbach ^{( Talk | Contribs)} 05:04, 15 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

File:NC Drivers License.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Scan of state driving license claimed as pd. Is clearly a derivative work of something the state would copyright Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:24, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.