| < December 3 | December 5 > |
|---|
December 4
File:Laurindo_almeida_with_salli_terri_1959.jpg
File:N1 booster lp.gif
- File:N1 booster lp.gif ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The license does not look right. Why should this be PD?
MGA73 (
talk)
23:30, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
- Your decisions shouldn't be based on 'feelings' or 'hunches'. This photo was taken by someone from the Soviet space agency. It could not be any outside media photographer since the N1 project was highly secretive. By virtue of the Soviet law at the time all informal photos taken by employees of the said space agency were deemed property of that space agency. All those materials (pictures included) were made public by the agency's successor through an official decision, thereby becoming part of "official documents of state government agencies". Both space agencies (past and present one) are in fact government agencies.--
Alvez3 (
talk)
04:57, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for the information. You are right we should not decide based on 'feelings' etc. That is why it is important that file page has all the relevant information so it is possible to verify that the work is PD. Someone started a DR on the same file on Commons (
commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:N1 booster lp.gif). I will add a link to this discussion. --
MGA73 (
talk)
20:33, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing that out. I've just added a more expanded version of the argument there ( commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:N1 booster lp.gif).-- Alvez3 ( talk) 22:38, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for the information. You are right we should not decide based on 'feelings' etc. That is why it is important that file page has all the relevant information so it is possible to verify that the work is PD. Someone started a DR on the same file on Commons (
commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:N1 booster lp.gif). I will add a link to this discussion. --
MGA73 (
talk)
20:33, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Your decisions shouldn't be based on 'feelings' or 'hunches'. This photo was taken by someone from the Soviet space agency. It could not be any outside media photographer since the N1 project was highly secretive. By virtue of the Soviet law at the time all informal photos taken by employees of the said space agency were deemed property of that space agency. All those materials (pictures included) were made public by the agency's successor through an official decision, thereby becoming part of "official documents of state government agencies". Both space agencies (past and present one) are in fact government agencies.--
Alvez3 (
talk)
04:57, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
| < December 3 | December 5 > |
|---|
December 4
File:Laurindo_almeida_with_salli_terri_1959.jpg
File:N1 booster lp.gif
- File:N1 booster lp.gif ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The license does not look right. Why should this be PD?
MGA73 (
talk)
23:30, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
- Your decisions shouldn't be based on 'feelings' or 'hunches'. This photo was taken by someone from the Soviet space agency. It could not be any outside media photographer since the N1 project was highly secretive. By virtue of the Soviet law at the time all informal photos taken by employees of the said space agency were deemed property of that space agency. All those materials (pictures included) were made public by the agency's successor through an official decision, thereby becoming part of "official documents of state government agencies". Both space agencies (past and present one) are in fact government agencies.--
Alvez3 (
talk)
04:57, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for the information. You are right we should not decide based on 'feelings' etc. That is why it is important that file page has all the relevant information so it is possible to verify that the work is PD. Someone started a DR on the same file on Commons (
commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:N1 booster lp.gif). I will add a link to this discussion. --
MGA73 (
talk)
20:33, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing that out. I've just added a more expanded version of the argument there ( commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:N1 booster lp.gif).-- Alvez3 ( talk) 22:38, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for the information. You are right we should not decide based on 'feelings' etc. That is why it is important that file page has all the relevant information so it is possible to verify that the work is PD. Someone started a DR on the same file on Commons (
commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:N1 booster lp.gif). I will add a link to this discussion. --
MGA73 (
talk)
20:33, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Your decisions shouldn't be based on 'feelings' or 'hunches'. This photo was taken by someone from the Soviet space agency. It could not be any outside media photographer since the N1 project was highly secretive. By virtue of the Soviet law at the time all informal photos taken by employees of the said space agency were deemed property of that space agency. All those materials (pictures included) were made public by the agency's successor through an official decision, thereby becoming part of "official documents of state government agencies". Both space agencies (past and present one) are in fact government agencies.--
Alvez3 (
talk)
04:57, 5 December 2010 (UTC)